Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 5  Next >

Pettigrew really a bust?

Avatar

Posted: 10/29/2009 10:15 PM

Pettigrew really a bust? 


Not according to this....

 

http://www.mlive.com/lions/ind...ons_brando.html

 

 

 

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/29/2009 10:22 PM

Re: Pettigrew really a bust? 


Anybody that ever even began to think Pettigrew is a bust just doesn't know football. Flat out.

 

"The biggest thing is just being decisive about what I'm doing on the field. It's doing it and not thinking so much. It's gotten better, but I need to be more comfortable so every play is like that.''

 

How many times did I make this exact point about Pettigrew?  The game is moving very fast and he needs things to slow down before his mistakes will decrease.

Last edited 10/29/2009 10:26 PM by Wildcat67

Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/29/2009 10:25 PM

RE: Pettigrew really a bust? 


He's 7 games into his career and people are labeling him a bust? I guess Stafford was a bust after his first two games then...........


Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/29/2009 10:29 PM

RE: Pettigrew really a bust? 


2 games? I knew after the first drive. Shoot.

Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/29/2009 10:41 PM

Re: Pettigrew really a bust? 


Took you guys a lot longer to figure out what I already knew..... when he was born.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/29/2009 10:44 PM

Re: Pettigrew really a bust? 


tongueHe can block and catch dont see him being a bust.........rookie qb throwing to a rookie te and you dont expect growing pains?  Once stafford and pettigrew get there timing down...which shows with every reciever we have at times this will be a good offense....it is real early to call him a bust....HE is the best TE on this team...just hasnt played to his potential yet.....If it takes 2 years it still doesnt make him a bust

Avatar 
DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS

Last edited 10/30/2009 9:08 AM by manchu

Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/29/2009 10:48 PM

Re: Pettigrew really a bust? 


Everyone knows you can tell a bust within the first 5 minutes of him being on the football field!!

Reply | Quote
  • KW280
  • Little Kitty
  • 40 posts this site

Posted: 10/29/2009 11:38 PM

Re: Pettigrew really a bust? 


the only people labeling him a bust were the ones that were screaming for guy's that weren't the best at their positions.

 

Oher is going to be a right tackle in the NFL guys. that's basically it.

Rey Maualuga regressed his last season at USC and was more of a youtube sensation, it's why Cushing and Clay Matthews went before him.. they were better football players

 

I personally like Peria Jerry, and he was a possibility at that position.. but you can get a Peria Jerry in the 2010 NFL draft in the 2nd/3rd round this year.  There isn't a Pettigrew in the draft this year.

 

Pettigrew was a LEGIT top 15 talent, and many mocks had him going to a couple different teams in the early teens.. he dropped because a few teams drafted for need..

 

This falls back into BPA.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/29/2009 11:53 PM

Re: Pettigrew really a bust? 


I don't know that there is too many people calling him a bust yet.

 

Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/29/2009 11:57 PM

Re: Pettigrew really a bust? 


Not a bust, just someone who has missed some opportunities that you would hope a first round pick would make. I have always heard how good is hands were, havent seen it a whole lot yet.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/30/2009 12:19 AM

Re: Pettigrew really a bust? 


 

DETROIT4LIFE wrote:

Not a bust, just someone who has missed some opportunities that you would hope a first round pick would make. I have always heard how good is hands were, havent seen it a whole lot yet.

Where did you hear that? One of the teakest part of Pettigrews game coming out of college were his recieving skills..he is a very good blocker but needs to improve in the recieving game. He was miles above TE's in the blocking aspect of his game which is why he was such a high draft pick.

Photobucket

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/30/2009 12:44 AM

Re: Pettigrew really a bust? 


pettigrews not a bust

 

if you watched him play at oklahoma state... the kids a monster, give him a minute, hell be alright

 

(under my breath)... still doesnt mean we should have taken him ohlord

hard to believe the same owner & front office who blew so many picks on blue chip prospects finally got it right ... 5 TIMES.... IN 1 SINGLE DRAFT ... hope im wrong ... but ill believe it when i see it

Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/30/2009 12:54 AM

RE: Pettigrew really a bust? 


Pettigrew is not a bust! Can I get an Amen!
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/30/2009 1:06 AM

RE: Pettigrew really a bust? 


 

Radiofriendly420 wrote: Pettigrew is not a bust! Can I get an Amen!

AMEN!

Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/30/2009 1:20 AM

Re: Pettigrew really a bust? 


Fans are manic depressive here.

 

I've seen wild things from this board.

 

Derrick Williams was proclaimed a bust after not being active for a few weeks before he even played a game. 

 

First two weeks you had everyone that wanted Sanchez post non stop and how Stafford was a bust.

 

Avril hsan't been productive where he on pace for about 8 sacks not bad for a second year player who missed a few games.

 

Pettigrew is a bust.

 

Kevin Smith was a must be healthy for a bears win to now needs to be replaced.

 

Where a young team and I can see the talent on this team it is a young core.  Its going to take time.  We played some of the best teams in the league with young young team and been in most games.  We won't know what we got for a while.

Last edited 10/30/2009 1:21 AM by kenkanniff

Reply | Quote
  • WizardofAz
  • Flea-infested Lynx
  • 464 posts this site

Posted: 10/30/2009 1:42 AM

RE: Pettigrew really a bust? 


Don't forget that not only did i know that he was a bust from the get go but also this is an article written by Tom Kowalski so it can't possibly be credible in any way shape or form.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/30/2009 4:13 AM

Re: Pettigrew really a bust? 


 

manchu wrote:

He can block and catch do see him being a bust.........rookie qb throwing to a rookie te and you dont expect growing pains? Once stafford and pettigrew get there timing down...which shows with every reciever we have at times this will be a good offense....it is real early to call him a bust....HE is the best TE on this team...just hasnt played to his potential yet.....If it takes 2 years it still doesnt make him a bust

Now I've watched all the games, however, it's hard to remember Pettigrews performances simply because they were forgettable. Maybe that's the way he wants it. He'll never be flashy, but as long as he progresses to make the catches he's supposed to make and gets his NFL caliber blocking technique down, I'll live with the pick.

 

From the looks of it Pettigrew has played and started all 6 games this year. He was shut out of the Saints game and tailed off during the Pitt and GB games. Here's what I see, his QB wasn't Stafford.

 

With Stafford playing: 10 rec 131 yards

W/O Stafford: 2 rec 21 yards

 

He provides our MASSIVE investment with a small insurance policy in the form of another weapon.

 



Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/30/2009 6:32 AM

Re: Pettigrew really a bust? 


Many were saying "bust" after a couple of missed catches that he arguably should have made in Green Bay. It would have been potentially momentum changing in both instances, and with an already frustrating performance, as per usual in Packer land, people were just steaming . . . venting, really.

If you go back and look at both plays, yeah, he could and probably should have made those grabs, but neither, by any stretch of the imagination, were easy catches. He was sandwiched between two defenders on the first one, and Culpepper but it in a nice spot, but I don't think Pettigrew could see the ball clearly, one, and two, I think he may have even thought the defender was going to get a hand on it.

The other he had to lay out for and make a nice play on. He should have made the catch I'd say, but it wasn't easy.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/30/2009 7:54 AM

Re: Pettigrew really a bust? 


This Pettigrew talk is so irritating because, before the season, if anybody had listened I said this same thing.

There are people on here who, from the day his name was called, expected Gonzo. This was not only irritating, it proved a lot about expectations to me. I was ripped and ragged because I said Petty was a 400 yard, 40 catch 4 TD TE as a rookie. What is he on pace for? 405 yards and 32 catches. Not a bad estimate. I also said that Petty's value would be in the run game....last year we ranked 30th in total rushing....this year we're 24. Holy crumbs! An IMPROVEMENT!

This mind shattering logic I have? It's a complex system of checks and balances, nuclear physics and brain surgery. Or.....we can look at TEs drafted in the first over the last several years in their first year......

2008: Dustin Keller: 48 catches, 535 yards, 3 TDs

2007: Greg Olsen: 39 catches, 391 yards, 2 TDs

2006:Vernon Davis: 20 catches, 265 yards, 3 TDs, Marcedes Lewis: 13 catches, 126 yards, 1 TD

2005:Heath Miller:39 catches, 459 yards, 6 TDs

2004: K2 (don't bother, no real stats), Ben Watson:2 catches, 16 yards, 0 TDs

2003: Dallas Clark: 29 catches, 340 yards, 1 TD

2002: Jeremy Shockey: 74 catches, 894 yards, 2 TDs, Daniel Graham: 15 catches, 150 yards, 1 TD, Jerramy Stevens: 26 catches, 252 yards, 3 TDs

2001:Todd Heap: 16 catches, 206 yards, 1 TD

2000:Bubba Franks: 34 catches, 363 yards, 1 TD, Anthony Becht:16 catches, 144 yards, 2 TDs

And there wasn't a TE drafted in the first....before then.......EXCEPT......

1997: Tony Gonzalez: 33 catches, 368 yards, 2 TDs

HOLY CRAP! Tony Gonzalez was a friggin bust as a rookie!!!ohlord

Like I said my problem isn't educated posters who disliked the pick....it's people who take no time to actually sit down before they post and hit Google for the history of first round TEs and how far off Pettigrew will likely be. Fact is: Pettigrew is simply on par with EVERY first round TE since Tony Gonzalez (except Shockey).

If you're gonna gripe about him NOT being Shockey? You open up a can of worms....because, lets remember, for as good as he is? Calvin wasn't Randy Moss as a rookie. redface

Just quit with this Oher garbage. The guy wasn't worth the pick. TEs don't, by HISTORICAL FACT, do well as rookies when drafted in the first round. This has become such a joke (the Pettigrew a bust stuff) that it's really showing the level of thought that goes into some peoples posts.

"He was the backup last year. He was a backup the year before that.He's been a back up his whole career. I don't think anybody would be surprised if I thought he was a backup".

Martin Mayhew on Dan Orlovsky. Detroit Free Press, 2.21.09

Last edited 10/30/2009 8:02 AM by VinceLombardisGhost

Reply | Quote
  • MyLions
  • Chaser of Dogs
  • 503 posts this site

Posted: 10/30/2009 8:10 AM

RE: Pettigrew really a bust? 


It is important to remember that Pettigrew missed a lot of time recovering from the hammy injury (I think) during training camp and I think he hit a wall the last couple weeks. I think the bye week may do a player like him (young, missed some key time early) a lot of good. Stop thinking about a play and just play. Get back to playing with instincts instead of thinking. I am expecting a nice second half for Pettigrewm esp. now that Stafford is back. The same goes for Hill and D. Williams.
Reply | Quote
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 5  Next >