Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
Inbox

Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 14

Posted: 12/08/2012 5:22 PM

Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 14 


Congradulations to the Bakersfield College Renegades !!!! They have been tremendous in the playoffs beating an undefeated Ventura squad 48-8 and the next week beating the undefeated Mt Sac 30-21........... both teams had beaten the Gades in the regular season but the Gades had sweet revenge beating both squads on the road.

The 2013 California State Champions just manhandled the City College of San Francisco to complete the championship run as the Renegades beat CCSF 35-14....... BC finished the season with a 11-2 record and have to be a top 5 rated team in the nation !!!!
Reply | Quote

Posted: 12/08/2012 6:04 PM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 



NCoast65 wrote: Congradulations to the Bakersfield College Renegades !!!! They have been tremendous in the playoffs beating an undefeated Ventura squad 48-8 and the next week beating the undefeated Mt Sac 30-21........... both teams had beaten the Gades in the regular season but the Gades had sweet revenge beating both squads on the road.

The 2013 California State Champions just manhandled the City College of San Francisco to complete the championship run as the Renegades beat CCSF 35-14....... BC finished the season with a 11-2 record and have to be a top 5 rated team in the nation !!!!
NCiast65.....you said it like nobody else could!


Attendance was good, but not what was hoped for….just over 11,600

 

THANKS RENEGADES FOR A GREAT SEASON

Last edited 12/08/2012 6:04 PM by bcfan1955

Reply | Quote

Posted: 12/08/2012 6:20 PM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 


BC, this championship is well deserved and congratulations . . . Winning the last three games leaves no doubt in allowing the Gades to hoist the trophy . . . Was this game dominated on the line? Watching the Mt Sac game, one could see how that game was won . . . It was simply the BC O-line and D-line that earned the victory, along with fine QB play and #84 who was the best athlete on the field . . . Did BC control the line of scrimmage vs CCSF?
Reply | Quote

Posted: 12/08/2012 6:32 PM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 



diablos06 wrote: BC, this championship is well deserved and congratulations . . . Winning the last three games leaves no doubt in allowing the Gades to hoist the trophy . . . Was this game dominated on the line? Watching the Mt Sac game, one could see how that game was won . . . It was simply the BC O-line and D-line that earned the victory, along with fine QB play and #84 who was the best athlete on the field . . . Did BC control the line of scrimmage vs CCSF?
have not seen the stats yet....but we had some sacks, AND a lot of hurries

CCSF went to an almost ALL passing game in the second half and we still held
them scoreless.......but we were scorless as well in the second half
Reply | Quote

Posted: 12/08/2012 7:09 PM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 


SCORE at halftime was 28-7 BC....... so, each team had a TD in the second half....

Yes, the O line controlled the LOS at least in the first half and held their own in the 2nd half while the D line was outstanding all day long but what impressed me about the D was the back 7 of BC !!!! They were outstanding against the pass..... I suspect that CCSF abandoned the run for 2 reasons..... #1 they couldn`t move the ball against that front 7 of the Gades and #2 only option to get back into the game in the second half trailing 28-7 at the start the 2nd half was to air it out !!!!

BC was great on both sides of the ball !!!! Hard to pick one over the other...... I mean they put up 35 points while limiting CCSF to a meager 14 points for the game !!!!

In BCs 3 playoff games they scored 114 points and only gave up 42 points beating 2 undefeated teams and CCSF that had 1 loss............

Last edited 12/08/2012 7:17 PM by NCoast65

Reply | Quote

Posted: 12/08/2012 8:44 PM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 


NCoast....
I stand corrected.....thanks
Reply | Quote

Posted: 12/09/2012 1:26 AM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 


Championships are earned on the field, by playing championship football --today BC did just that, winning in every competitive aspect ( except maybe punting).  BC completely deserves everything that goes with this victory.  Faced with the challenge of a truly important game, in front of a very large crowd and a global web audience, BC dominated, all across the field.
To me, since every unit was so impressive, it is hard to single out any one aspect, but clearly, a very athletic QB behind a unified OL, aided by determined effective RBs, put 3 TDs on the board early, but more important, controlled time of possession.  BC's defense got enough pressure with a 3 man base pass rush to allow an 8 man zone to smother CCSF's spread pass offense, and the scoreboard made it impossible for CCSF to use a run-dominant offensive play-call.  For sure, Kyani Harris looked like Jerry Rice running under the open parts of the zone, but BC's coaches figured out how to shut down everyone else, and sealed off Spivey from any running lanes.  And two defensive TDS off forced turnovers were huge.

Today's game produced a champion in every sense of the word, a champion of Cal JC Football --could BC win a national title playoff game? well, I know NJCAA has a tough team on top, but none of us here believes they would beat the Gades, especially if the game was in Bakersfield. 

Congratulations to everyone attached to this legendary Bakersfield program, especially coaches and players, your effort today is a tribute to what California JC Football is all about.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 12/09/2012 8:41 AM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 


I saw the game different,First hats off to BC for the win. BC O really only scored 21. The other 14 were scored on D that took advantage of costly turnovers inside Bakersfield red-zone. Speaking red zone, CCSF other turnovers happen inside their own red zone. Neither QB played very well, If not for missed tackles CCSF would not have scored. Bakersfield running game was on the first half taking big chunks and taking advantage of a mediocre defense for CCSF. CCSF Defense was weak all season long from the first game to the last. Yesterday they faced a Defense that were not going to let big play after Big Play beat them,they had good pressure all day long with Spivey. They either sacked him or forced him to chuck and duck which led to the INTs.CCSF abandon the running game in the second half which killed them, allowing a Good Bakersfield Defense to go after the QB with no fear of the run and sit back and read the QBs eyes for the 2 INTs and another 3 that were dropped.Combine that with 8 penalties in the first half and you had a typical 2012 CCSF game with out the comeback. Normally you would say a great team caused all the mistakes and won the game. Maybe, I think CCSF lost the game because of poor play and mental mistakes.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 12/09/2012 9:36 AM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 


What you saw thru your rose tinted glasses was obviously skewed............. the BC D was outstanding all game long putting pressure on the CCSF QB with a 3 man rush and a spy in the middle but to me the games most impressive aspect to BCs` D was the coverage of the back 7 !!!!! The back 7 had a tent over the CCSF WRs` all game long.. allowing that 3 man rush to force hurried throws and the turnovers you speak of WERE created by an the outstanding defensive unit of the Renegades......

The BC offense took advantage of the turnovers their D created and really pounded the ball and controlled the LOS in the first half while on offense...... CCSF couldn`t stop the BC O !!!! Nor could they stop the relentless pressure of the Renegades D !!! The game was over in the 2nd Q when BC went up 28-0............. from that point on CCSF had too much of a deficit to make up to continue any sort of running attack........ so, the BC D made the CCSF into a one dimensional offense taking the run away and played great coverage in the back 7 while getting a more than adequate pass rush by their 3 mann rush and when the CCSF QB was flushed from the pocket the spy in the middle was there to make the tackle along with backside speed of the DE in pursuit........

BC played their DEs on the outside shoulder of the CCSF O tacke and putting pressure on with their speed.......... DBs played a cover 2 scheme with CB press..... just no where to throw but underneath.....

Next time you watch a game you might consider taking those rose tinted glasses off OR lay off that funny stuff !!!!
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 12/09/2012 2:51 PM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 


I’ve just been savoring the Californian articles, pictures and some of the Gade player’s comments…Just some random items. The pre-game picture of BC’s O-line wasn’t all that impressive, but they played BIG and with a lot of heart. BC RB Jalen Sykes let all of the OL get a picture with his MVP trophy. He had 161 yds. in the first half (179 overall), 238 yds. at half for both BC RBs. In HS Sykes was not even his teams (Garces) go to RB…. DE #45 Oglesby (MVP – defense), on his picked up fumble for a TD, “They (BC coaches) want us to fall on the ball. But when you’ve got a chance at glory, you’ve got to take it”…. In HS when your kid’s team had to play BHS, you’d hate having to deal with the speed and quickness of their DB’s. But when they are called Renegades it’s sweet (Jackson, Maston and converted QB Hannible)… Four turnovers and 5 sacks by the BC defense.


CCSF QB Spivey was 27 of 50 for 357 yds. Wide receiver and MVP offense #11 Kyani Harris was uncanny – 20 catches for 266 yd. BC could not shut him down. CCFS’s Australian rugby style punter Vultaggio was something to watch (46 yds. per punt on the year). He was big and would take off running with it Rugby style and then kick a low line drive (no hang time for this guy) away from the return man that would bound forever like a squib kick. It worked; the focus was definitely on what he’d do, not on BC’s speedy return quy. Like FG kicking went soccer style from straight on, it almost made you wonder if you were possibly witnessing the future style of punting.


Some were upset about the CCCAA program cover with a CCSF player and Mt SAC's Nick Montana on the cover. I guess someone was counting their chickens before they hatched. The 16,125 (official) crowd was fun to be a part of. BC coach Chudy credited the “boisterous crowd” with playing a pivotal role in the Gades fast start. “It was absolutely electrifying. To have this kind of atmosphere is so much more memorable.” The black “RC” emblem painted on the field was in memory of long time BC team physician Dr. Roman Clerou. Go Gades!

Reply | Quote

Posted: 12/09/2012 4:03 PM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 


acdad0330 . . . Pre-game photo of the O-line wasn't that impressive . . . I felt the same way sitting in the stands as a Mt Sac fan two weeks ago, I noticed the size the BC line, both offensive and defensive and felt the Mounties would have the advantage due to our size . . . Just goes to prove it's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the fight inside the dog . . . Most impressive stat about the championship game has to be the 16,000+ in attendance, something that is surely lacking among most CC football programs . . .
Reply | Quote

Posted: 12/09/2012 5:52 PM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 


The punter for CCSF is Sam Irwin Hill.
I don't know if anyone of you guy saw it. He had one of the rugby kicks in the second half......kicking left footed.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 12/09/2012 5:59 PM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 


Again, Thought BC Defense had a good game. Since I do not have a dog in the fight you received a Honest Opinion. Outstanding Defenses do not miss tackles that allow a 15yd play to go 50. Good Defenses do.The first Defensive TD was not caused by pressure but by a missed snap. Heads up play but that was on CCSF. I felt even with the 4 turnovers that CCSF was still in the game until the end of the 3rd Q Because BC did nothing on offense the second half and a great team puts CCSF away. there were 2 series that ended the game,when Spivey through the second INT on the goal line for the touchback and when CCSF D held the BC O right after that, then after the whistle the CCSF play cheap shotted the QB or RB and BC got another 15 yds and first down.Then I felt it was over. By the way 7+3 is 10 As far as the funny stuff, that stuff is not legal in my neck of the woods but glad to see you had your prescription filled. When you lose the turnover game and the penalty game you are going to lose plain and simple. Bakersfield won the game deserved the Title and had a great run the last half of the season.Great Defense NO Good defense YES,Great Offense NO Good offense MAYBE, Great team and Coaches YES
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 12/09/2012 9:30 PM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 


BigSky28:  BC defense had a great game – they had CCSF rattled early and often.  I understand where you are coming from good vs. great, but if a couple of missed tackles for a touchdown is the difference between good and great, some Super Bowl winners probably wouldn’t make your great list.  And defensive pressure most certainly can cause bad center snaps.  You said ….a great team puts CCSF away. CCSF was put away by half time, the same as CCSF realistically had Mt SAC put away by half time last year.  But defensively let’s go by a more objective standard:


CCSF                      Normal                 vs. BC

Pts. /game                40.2                      14                          

Rush                       189                      40

Gain/rush                  4.7                      1.3

Pass                       262                     *357

Fumbles                                             3/2

Interceptions                                        2

Sacks                                                5

Time of pos.              30.46                    27.41    


Admittedly CCSF spanked the Gades many years ago at our last meeting by about the same score as this year (I was there), but this year CCSF got spanked.  BC played a great defensive game.                                                                       

Last edited 12/09/2012 9:33 PM by acdad0330

Reply | Quote

Posted: 12/10/2012 7:45 AM

Re: Bakersfield College Renegades 35.................... CCSF 


Lol BigSky.  You thought SF was in it in the 3rd quarter?  The game was over when Alphonso Jackson picked Spivey at the goal line early in the first half.  BC had all the momentum and SF was punch drunk.  Stuffing the run, multiple turnovers forced, and I lost count of how many red zone stops.  It was great Defense.  With today's rules as they are, even great defense will surrender some points.  Unless that SF WR who had 20 catches is some kind of bum who had no business gathering those stats, then you would have a point.  I think it's silly to debate semantics like this (good vs great) but I have to stand up for the Gades D in this case.

Last edited 12/10/2012 7:47 AM by expandingman

Reply | Quote