Posted: 10/21/2012 11:09 PM
Posted: 10/22/2012 7:31 AM
bandrat wrote: Butler beat:Blinn by 18Coffeyville by 32AFP by 43Ft. Scott by 46Dodge by 60Highland by 61Garden by 71Indy by 73The fact remains that Coffeyville gave Butler it's toughest game to date in the conference and the Ravens are rebuilding and not even ranked nationally. It is what it is.
Posted: 10/22/2012 7:48 AM
bandrat wrote: the Ravens are rebuilding and not even ranked nationally. It is what it is.
Posted: 10/22/2012 7:51 AM
Butler79 wrote: Speaking of Smith, it looked like he had a pretty nasty hamstring pull. Hopefully, it's not a tear. I don't expect him to be back before our bowl game, but I am open to being pleasantly surprised.
Posted: 10/22/2012 8:11 AM
Irish2009 wrote: Butler79 wrote: Speaking of Smith, it looked like he had a pretty nasty hamstring pull. Hopefully, it's not a tear. I don't expect him to be back before our bowl game, but I am open to being pleasantly surprised.Is there any update or word on this? That injury concerns me greatly as Smith was not just one of the best backs in the conference, but perhaps in the nation this year. I feel like it noticeably hurt our rushing attack for the remainder of the game - and wasn't Thomas still nursing that sore heel that kept him out for a couple games, so even he wasn't 100%?
Posted: 10/22/2012 8:49 AM
Posted: 10/22/2012 9:07 AM
bandrat wrote: Nothing changes the fact that lowly Coffeyville gave Butler it's closest conference game to date.
Posted: 10/22/2012 9:20 AM
Posted: 10/22/2012 9:30 AM
bandrat wrote: The bottom line is that Butler needed a blowout to be assured of playing for a national championship. They didn't get it. Their last chance is to stomp Hutch and that won't be easy.
Posted: 10/22/2012 12:15 PM
Posted: 10/22/2012 12:48 PM
Posted: 10/22/2012 1:38 PM
68camaro wrote: Irish:It was said in a earlier post that losing your(Butlers) running back impacted the outcome. Well Coffeyvilles' game against Highland was played with 4 key players not playing. Would that impact that outcome if 4 players were gone? Butler beat Coffeyville I am sure we can all agree on that.Butler has a better quality players than Coffeyville. I am sure we can agree on that.Butler did not beat them by as much as they/you would have liked. I am sure we can agree on that to.To bring up lost opportunities in a game is silly. How about the first play of the game??? If the receiver could have put a little more on that pass that was a TD. How about if the Ville would have stayed at home on that punt play that would have took away a TD. You were punting on 4th down you know. Explain this....If Butler was not desperate to get the score up why did Butler leave Cosh in the game the whole night. The season is almost over. Surely he wasnt out there to work on something. Coffeyville even pulled our QB for the last couple possessions.
Posted: 10/22/2012 10:15 PM
Posted: 10/23/2012 6:05 AM
bandrat wrote: I love this stuff, don't you? I always hate it when the season is over and we have to wait 8 or 9 months for the next season to get here. I like you guys up at Butler. I think you have a first class operation up there and I always look forward to playing you . For a long time we dominated the conference and won a few national championships in the process. But, things change and good fortune is a fleeting commodity. I do think with our current ex-Butler coaching staff, and the solid backing of our college administration, we will improve in the next couple of years and once again be a contender. I wish I could come and see your game with Hutch. It ought to be a good one.
Posted: 10/23/2012 8:33 AM
Posted: 10/23/2012 8:56 AM
68camaro wrote: I do not know the answer but I am sure someone will set me straight.
Copyright © 2013
and Scout.com. All rights reserved. This website is an unofficial independent source of news and information, and is not affiliated with any school, team, or league.
MSN PrivacyLegalAdvertise on MSNAbout our adsRSS
© 2012 Microsoft|