SouthHasRisen wrote:I like all the stats, but IW also has more athletic programs to fund (look at both schools athletic websites). I would guess that IW is similar to Butler as far as $ (if anything Butler has more).
Please, please, please... this is so far from reality. Butler does not have money. They've won for years in spite of that.
SHR, the numbers dispute the idea that you put out that they simply spend more because they have more to fund and also I think that's an argument for proving they are extremely well funded... Butler doesn't have more athletes and sports than they currently do not because they wouldn't like to, but because there isn't the money.
IW spends about $1,200 in operating expenses per football player.
Butler spends only $500 in operating expenses per football player.
*** BTW Kansas fans, even freaking
Dodge spends $800 per athlete and
Hutch and CV both spend around $1,000***
If IW is spending that kind of money just on operating expenses of the program you can be danged sure that they're spending even more money to ensure that they are spending it on the right type of athlete. Hence, they are doubling down on scholarships. Lots of them. Don't try to fleece it any way, Reivers.
Butler DOES NOT HAVE MORE MONEY... why can't people see that? The stadium that was just built was almost completely donor funded. Their facilities until the last 5 years haven't even been as nice as Highland's. They played at a high school stadium that was built before WW2 (and looked like it) until their new digs.
It's the same thing for baseball...
IW spends $1,800 per athlete
Butler spends only $800 per athlete
Women's basketball...
IW $3,000 per athlete
Butler $1,100 per athlete
Track...
IW, $2,000
Butler, $1,300
Iowa Western has money. Lots of it.