Posted: 02/11/2013 1:39 PM
I have short posted 3 or 4 times on another site under a different name. But, as Lemon says, my writing DNA finally came out when I saw Butte ranked #2, in that site’s final top 30 national poll, above BC at #4. Most posters agreed (including a Butte fan) and no one tried to defend Butte at #2. This is basically what NCoast already said, only in a lot more words;
*Based on the SCFA end of regular season rankings for SoCal and NorCal:
Both Butte and BC played 3 unranked teams.
Number of Top 5 wins? Butte - 2 North. BC - 2 South +1 North.
Losses? Butte 1 - Lost to #5 (8-3) DeAnza (35-25)--BC 2 - Lost to #1 MtSAC (14-34) and #2 Ventura (24-30 4OT)
Games Played? Butte – 11 and BC - 13
Post Season Win(s)? Butte - 1 Bowl victory (35-17) over #5 in NorCal Fresno (8-3)
Post Season Wins – BC - 3:
SoCal playoff win (48-8) over undefeated #2 in SoCal Ventura (10-0)
SoCal Championship win (30-21) over undefeated #1 in SoCal Mount SAC (11-0)
CA State Championship win (35-14) over once defeated (by Butte) #2 in NorCal CCSF (10-1)
Common Opponents? Butte 31 CCSF 21 (10 points)------- BC 35 CCSF 14 (21 points)
Anybody? WHY is Butte ranked #2 and BC #4 in the final top 30 poll. Butte ranked #2 over BC #4 is indefensible based on the facts.
Last edited 02/11/2013 1:43 PM by acdad0330
Posted: 02/11/2013 8:50 PM
Posted: 02/12/2013 12:16 AM
jckevin wrote: just an FYI...we don't acknowledge any rankings that anyone else does.There are the official polls.And there are the JCFootball.com / JC Grid-Wire ranking.That be it.Honestly - just stop posting about the other guy's stuff. It's just more for me to delete.
Copyright © 2013
and Scout.com. All rights reserved. This website is an unofficial independent source of news and information, and is not affiliated with any school, team, or league.
MSN PrivacyLegalAdvertise on MSNAbout our adsRSS
© 2012 Microsoft|