DD Wrote:  Why do we even have conferences then if you think a conference champ does not deserve to make the playoffs? You're just taking the overall record in consideration which just makes conference play irrelevant.

Good point – SB was 5-1 in conference, I forgot about that, and they did have a tough schedule.  There is just something about 6-4 that I don’t think belongs in the playoffs.  Looking at it, the conferences were pretty well balanced and I was surprised that the Central Conference was actually the toughest by the numbers.  NC – 2 top 10 (+COC #11), CC - 4 top 10, SC – 3 top 10. 

So I guess you make a good point.  I just know I thought BC was getting screwed, for a  as good of a team as we had, when I thought it was BC going to get aced by SB.  This proved to be true.  As it turned out it was RCC – but it was really basically the same thing (they beat SB 51-13).  Fair for everyone is hard to come by, I guess someone’s always going feel like it should have been them.

acdad0330 wrote:

DD Wrote:  Why do we even have conferences then if you think a conference champ does not deserve to make the playoffs? You're just taking the overall record in consideration which just makes conference play irrelevant.

---

Good point – SB was 5-1 in conference, I forgot about that, and they did have a tough schedule.  There is just something about 6-4 that I don’t think belongs in the playoffs.  Looking at it, the conferences were pretty well balanced and I was surprised that the Central Conference was actually the toughest by the numbers.  NC – 2 top 10 (+COC #11), CC - 4 top 10, SC – 3 top 10. 

So I guess you make a good point.  I just know I thought BC was getting screwed, for a  as good of a team as we had, when I thought it was BC going to get aced by SB.  This proved to be true.  As it turned out it was RCC – but it was really basically the same thing (they beat SB 51-13).  Fair for everyone is hard to come by, I guess someone’s always going feel like it should have been them.