Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
Inbox

Re: Should teams have a suggestion box for play calling??

Avatar

Posted: 10/21/2012 7:54 PM

Re: Should teams have a suggestion box for play calling?? 


Being a great JC football coach is probably like a lot of other things, easier said than done. In a 2 year system, any major changes in offensive or defensive strategies and a coach loses whatever advantage a team might have with their sophomores, who learned the system last year.


I look at the offensive strategies of teams like VC, SAC, RCC, SB, Cerritos etc. I like what I see.  When the offence is set, there is at least some strategic tension for a defense as to what they might do.


BC lines up with 2 tight ends on first and second down and runs it up the middle.  We’re a north and south running team by gum.  What do defenses do?  They put 8 in the box.  That’s how BC, having 2 of the best running backs in the NC, comes up with 68 yards rushing against a team like Moorpark.

 
I guess the grass is always greener……….. noideaArm chair QBs, we're the best! wink

Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/21/2012 11:12 PM

Re: Should teams have a suggestion box for play calling?? 


BC has been running north and south for as long as I've been a fan...and
that's a very long time. AND it works when we have all the ducks in a row to
run the ball
We've had only two sub 100 yard games (1 loss to MtSac-64 yrds- 7/0
and 1 win against Moorpark - 68 yrds-2/6) so far this year.
The other 5 games:
130 yrds - Santa Ana   6/2
260 yrds - Fullerson     4/3
201 yrds - Ventura      8/0
268 yrds - Canyons     2/5
135 yrds - Elco           2/6

I know why we had only 64 yrds against MtSac - They were just to good for us
But only 68 yrds at Moorpark????????????? At 2/6.....we played down to them.

ACDAD...would you say it might be worth a down season to change our
offence? Or just keep having a down season after season, after season?

I know, how about bringing back the Old East High Single Wing
(At least I would know what's going on)

AND there would be no need for Arm chair QBs, as the QB in a single wing
was a blocking back most of the time (never getting the ball).  AND in the Double-wing variation there was NO QB

Last edited 10/21/2012 11:25 PM by bcfan1955

Reply | Quote