|
RE: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2013 5:28 PM
RE: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
Now if I'm not mistaken, isn't she gettying paid to worry about CJ Leslie's car deals instead of wondering about what UNC is doing???
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 9:17 AM
RE: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
--------------------------------------------- --- RetroHeel wrote:
Now if I'm not mistaken, isn't she gettying paid to worry about CJ Leslie's car deals instead of wondering about what UNC is doing???
---------------------------------------------
Though allegedly impoverished, CJ is sporting another new ride this year. I've taught several guys that played with and/or against CJ and John Wall in HS, and their opinions are remarkably consistent with the Olympic sport coaches at State, that CJ was and is on the take, FWIW.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- crossman
- All-American
- 1283 posts this site
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 9:45 AM
RE: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
I've heard that the car deals over there go through channels like a cell tower. Very difficult to track down. One of the "friends" of the program can't handle his booze and has talked a little bit but not enough to do much good, yet.
--------------------------------------------- --- therabidrev wrote:
--------------------------------------------- --- RetroHeel wrote:
Now if I'm not mistaken, isn't she gettying paid to worry about CJ Leslie's car deals instead of wondering about what UNC is doing???
---------------------------------------------
Though allegedly impoverished, CJ is sporting another new ride this year. I've taught several guys that played with and/or against CJ and John Wall in HS, and their opinions are remarkably consistent with the Olympic sport coaches at State, that CJ was and is on the take, FWIW.
---------------------------------------------
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 1:59 PM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
I'm still waiting her response
--------------------------------------------- --- crossman wrote:
Same thing happened to me. Isn't that interesting.
Their day is coming!
--------------------------------------------- --- trippc wrote:
I tried to send an email late yesterday and it came back "undeliverable". I assumed I had the address or something wrong but checked and I had everything correct.
I was told last night that a copy had successfully been sent to various people at Carolina as well as the ACC offices but I haven't heard whether they had received a response.
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 3:24 PM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
I emailed her last Thursday and have gotten no response.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 8:57 AM
RE: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
I'm still waiting on the response from Creighton's president - sent from one minister to another, he's a priest - that I sent last spring about their common criminal approach to basketball. Don't hold your breath.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- crossman
- All-American
- 1283 posts this site
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 9:07 AM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
If the woman is going to parade herself around like some type of authority on another school she needs to make herself available.
If she continues to ignore correspondence or block access to the account, bombard whiny Debbie with them. Copy the ACC offices as well as Tom Ross with them as well.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 9:18 AM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
I talked to a gentleman last night that feels if the email was legitimate, she has opened herself up to questions regarding the agdogs own compliance office that she would simply be forced to answer if she wanted to maintain any type of credibility.
The fact that she has not responded, or in some cases, appears to have blocked her account, seems unusual and inappropriate in light of the email.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 9:49 AM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
Does it strike anyone else as odd that they have a link to the UNC Infractions report at the bottom of a page on a NCSU Compliance website??? www.gopack.com/sports/complian.../dos-donts.htmlI sense some karma that could really come back to bite them in the collective wuffie arse.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 10:05 AM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
If it was any other school, yes, I would find it odd. For the agdogs, simply par for the course. Absolutely the type of thing I would have expected from those totally obsessed nutjobs.
Last edited 1/23/2013 10:06 AM by lightblueblood
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 11:00 AM
RE: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
If the Gott thread on ZZL is legit, Karma is coming home to roost at NCeSt.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 11:27 AM
RE: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
--------------------------------------------- --- therabidrev wrote:
If the Gott thread on ZZL is legit, Karma is coming home to roost at NCeSt.
---------------------------------------------
bttt. I'll be schadenfreudin' til the cows come home...
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 12:14 PM
RE: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
I agree except for who it is. Anything is possible with that bunch. I am still waiting for the reply.
--------------------------------------------- --- BethelRegiment wrote:
it was this: ..... "and I'm not going to stop asking questions until I get logical answers that are based on NCAA rules and associated interpretations. Stay tuned."
that's the 'bridge too far' that makes me think this is some 'you've been punked' exercise ......
maybe I'm naive .... but I just don't see the compliance person from State pressing the NCAA staff over some enforcement decision at UNC in which NC State is not involved in any way ........
if it was some factual/evidence type thing over the circumstances in recruiting a player where both schools were involved - I could see that ......... but inserting yourself into an enforcement decision/judgement regarding another school when your school has nothing to do with the situation - I just don't see that happening ...... I would think the NCAA staff or enforcement - just say - this is none of your bidness .......
I'll keep an open mind though ....
--------------------------------------------- --- GunslingerHeel wrote:
I just sent her an email and asked.
--------------------------------------------- --- BethelRegiment wrote:
I'm not buying this .....
at the end of the day all these people have to live together ..... this is too pat .......
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 1:32 PM
RE: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
I think it's entirely possible Ms. Doyle received and responded to an email from someone with enough juice in WuffieWorld that she wanted impress them with her response, not considering that the recipient would be dumb enough to post it on internet with her name and email address intact.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 4:21 PM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
Your theory is definitely plausible but IMO only, based somewhat on some things I've heard recently, I think it's highly unlikely.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 5:12 PM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
--------------------------------------------- --- lightblueblood wrote:
Your theory is definitely plausible but IMO only, based somewhat on some things I've heard recently, I think it's highly unlikely.
---------------------------------------------
care to expand?
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 6:08 PM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
I think that she was encouraged, in fact, instructed, to write exactly what she wrote. I won't say why I feel that way but let's just say I'm not the only one that shares that opinion.
Last edited 1/23/2013 6:08 PM by lightblueblood
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2013 8:14 AM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
--------------------------------------------- --- lightblueblood wrote:
I think that she was encouraged, in fact, instructed, to write exactly what she wrote. I won't say why I feel that way but let's just say I'm not the only one that shares that opinion.
---------------------------------------------
Do tell, please....
I think the fans over there are capable of pretty much anything. I would hope that the PTB, i.e. "the adults" would be smart enough not to throw rocks from their glass houses.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2013 8:45 AM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
The "adults" associated with the agdogs are as bad, if not worse. No one at NCS can, or should be trusted with anything. No conference member should trust them and the ACC PTB in G'Boro shouldn't trust them. They would stab anyone, any school, in the back at any time if they thought it might benefit them in any way.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- crossman
- All-American
- 1283 posts this site
|
Posted: 1/24/2013 8:54 AM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
Believe me. No one at the ACC offices trust the agdogs.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2013 9:09 AM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
I've sent at least 6 emails and have received no response to any of them.
Last edited 1/24/2013 9:09 AM by jarpe
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- uncheel
- Starter
- 331 posts this site
|
Posted: 1/24/2013 10:05 AM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
Given the long string of revelations that came out over the course of the NCAA's investigation, it's not surprising that they would say they're continuing to monitor the situation. It doesn't say they're actively doing anything (other than hiring Miami lawyers).
A key distinction in the BOG investigation is that it found definite issues with academic administration (such as charging the University to teach a lecture class when it was run as independent study), but that does not equate to the students cheating or being given an unfair advantage. Certainly, as an institution, I'd worry that a professor who'd set up a "no-show" class might also not bother to uphold academic standards in the reading/grading of the students' work (McAdoo's paper does comes to mind). But, without some solid evidence of deficient work for those classes and/or a tie to special treatment for athletes, I don't see this going anywhere with the NCAA as long as they feel the University is appropriately addressing the matter.
-------- Carolina2009 wrote:
The N&O ran an article today quoting Emmert as saying it appears to be only an academic issue, but the NCAA is still keeping apprised of the situation and ongoing investigations in case new evidence says otherwise.
---------------------------------------------
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2013 11:21 AM
Re: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
--------------------------------------------- --- BubbaOtis wrote:
--------------------------------------------- --- lightblueblood wrote:
I think that she was encouraged, in fact, instructed, to write exactly what she wrote. I won't say why I feel that way but let's just say I'm not the only one that shares that opinion.
---------------------------------------------
Do tell, please....
I think the fans over there are capable of pretty much anything. I would hope that the PTB, i.e. "the adults" would be smart enough not to throw rocks from their glass houses.
---------------------------------------------
This is Debbie Yow you're talking about here. Have seen some of the emails she's sent out to her idiot fanbase?
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2013 11:38 AM
RE: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
can someone please get the DTH to do a piece on this?
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 9:41 AM
RE: Proof of moou's involvement? (long)
The DTH? They're as anti-Carolina as the N&O. Perhaps even more so. Why they refer to themselves as "tar heel" anything is beyond me.
--------------------------------------------- --- RetiredCoach01 wrote:
can someone please get the DTH to do a piece on this?
---------------------------------------------
|
|
Reply |
Quote |