Minstrel wrote:
by QBR (ESPN's metric of quarterback play, which also takes into account sacks, rushing stats and leverage of each play based on game situation), Kaepernick is off to the best four game start ever.
Just to be clear, he's off to the best start since 2008, which is as far back as ESPN has calculated QBR.
Dan Marino's first four starts could have been greater, but until QBR is assessed, we won't know. (His numbers: 72-115, 62.6%, 983 yds, 8.54 YPA, 13 TD, 3 INT, 116.7 rtg, 14 rush, 0 yds, 1 TD, 6 sacks - 45 yds; 3-1 record en route to a 7-2 record as a starter). QBR is also just another stat, albeit one that is seen as being more insightful due to the situational aspect it captures in its analytics.
I think the question that this topic does not address is how 'fine' he will be the rest of this year. Will his 'fineness' be good enough to win the Super Bowl? Fairly or unfairly, that's the expectation that sits on his shoulders now because of how/when he was put into the starting spot. This wasn't a replacement of an injured QB at the start of the year. This was taking over for a QB that was playing at a higher level than a year ago, when he led the team to a 13-3 record and the NFC Championship game.
Most people in here, from what I've seen, all agree that Kaepernick's future is bright. Hall of Fame bright? Way too early to assess that, although Minstrel has given a good breakdown of why, at the very least, the early returns are promising enough to consider that as a potential upside trajectory. The main concern raised has been, was that future now?
To me, I think he has, thus far, performed well enough to have earned the right to play. If this wasn't a Super Bowl hopeful team at the time he took over, I don't think there would be any argument over letting him continue to start and earn his stripes. It's the situation that he was brought into the spotlight that raised eyebrows.
I'll add that I don't think it'll be fair to say that, if he fails to make it to the Super Bowl or even the NFC Championship, that it was the wrong move to make. The gamble wouldn't have quite paid off in the short term, but I don't think this was a move made thinking only of the short term. This was made with next year and the many years following in mind. If it doesn't result in a Super Bowl this year, but it has provided him with great experience going into next year and leads to a Championship (or many) down the line, then it still could have been a good move.
Bottom line.. anybody in here who is not a fan of Kaepernick's potential as the future QB of the franchise is probably not being very honest about his abilities. I haven't really seen anyone who appears to be standing behind that position, however.