Cards fans have nervously denied that Hurtt could be implicated because they trusted Charlie so much. Guessing he gets a "show cause" and they will have no choice but get rid of him and it will still make the NCAA go back as far as Bridgewater and take a closer look at the SO Florida pipeline. They may not find anything, but there is a lot more puckering going on in Cardland than there was 24 hours ago.

gocds12 wrote: Bad I'm not sure what UofL will do simply because I don't have any inside info; however, I could only guess that, as UK would do, that UofL would either cut him loose if the "show cause" is given to Clint Hurtt.  There has been speculation (rumors) that he might not be given the "show clause" because of his cooperation with the NCAA, but what do I know.  I'm not an NCAA rules expert, but I don't think this will have any effect on UofL directly or indirectly or any of it's players.  I would think that if UofL or any of it's players were to be affected that some of this info would have also leaked out just as this story is beginning to leak out.  As to the effect on current recruiting I simply don't know.

GO CARDS - BEAT EGGS!!!                                    God Bless America!!!

gocds12 wrote: Bad I'm not sure what UofL will do simply because I don't have any inside info; however, I could only guess that, as UK would do, that UofL would either cut him loose if the "show cause" is given to Clint Hurtt.  There has been speculation (rumors) that he might not be given the "show clause" because of his cooperation with the NCAA, but what do I know.  I'm not an NCAA rules expert, but I don't think this will have any effect on UofL directly or indirectly or any of it's players.  I would think that if UofL or any of it's players were to be affected that some of this info would have also leaked out just as this story is beginning to leak out.  As to the effect on current recruiting I simply don't know.

GO CARDS - BEAT EVERYBODY!!!                                    God Bless America!!!

jvolk wrote: Nothng new on this other than the the fact that the NCAA is ready to make thier case and start the final process. I know of no UL fans who ever felt Hurtt was innocent of all the stuff Shapario published and similar stuff. Too many coaches at the U involved and too much evidence to see anything else. You guys act like Hurtt was the only coach involved and UL was different for keeping him in place. The leaks so far seem to show that there will coaches at UL, Bama, WKU, another basketball school and the Head basketball coach at Mizzou all named in this report. All are working except Hill who left Florida.

ONce the chanrges are announced the coaches & Miami will have 90 days to answer them in writing & plead their case Then at some point the NCAA will announce any penalities to Miami and the coaches within 4-6 months. Most expect some kind of penality for Hurtt.

THe bottom line is UL is not involved in any of this. The only player on the UL roster ever listed was at any point was that Bridgewater as a HS Junior was taken by the Shapario Suite for a few minutes with the current QB of UCF. The NCAA already already cleared Teddy to play on this issue 2 years ok. Hurtt has been under the microscope at UL and is clean. 

In the end the worst case for UL is we lose a good recruiter. Maybe for several years or maybe forever. He is not the only coach UL has working in SF and in the end Charlie is the lead guy who signs the players. The program is doing well and they can find a new guy just as UK just found a whole new staff.

gocds12 wrote: Bad I'm not sure what UofL will do simply because I don't have any inside info; however, I could only guess that, as UK would do, that UofL would either cut him loose if the "show cause" is given to Clint Hurtt.  There has been speculation (rumors) that he might not be given the "show clause" because of his cooperation with the NCAA, but what do I know.  I'm not an NCAA rules expert, but I don't think this will have any effect on UofL directly or indirectly or any of it's players.  I would think that if UofL or any of it's players were to be affected that some of this info would have also leaked out just as this story is beginning to leak out.  As to the effect on current recruiting I simply don't know.

GO CARDS - BEAT EVERYBODY!!!                                    God Bless America!!!

jvolk wrote: Nothng new on this other than the the fact that the NCAA is ready to make thier case and start the final process. I know of no UL fans who ever felt Hurtt was innocent of all the stuff Shapario published and similar stuff. Too many coaches at the U involved and too much evidence to see anything else. You guys act like Hurtt was the only coach involved and UL was different for keeping him in place. The leaks so far seem to show that there will coaches at UL, Bama, WKU, another basketball school and the Head basketball coach at Mizzou all named in this report. All are working except Hill who left Florida.

ONce the chanrges are announced the coaches & Miami will have 90 days to answer them in writing & plead their case Then at some point the NCAA will announce any penalities to Miami and the coaches within 4-6 months. Most expect some kind of penality for Hurtt.

THe bottom line is UL is not involved in any of this. The only player on the UL roster ever listed was at any point was that Bridgewater as a HS Junior was taken by the Shapario Suite for a few minutes with the current QB of UCF. The NCAA already already cleared Teddy to play on this issue 2 years ok. Hurtt has been under the microscope at UL and is clean. 

In the end the worst case for UL is we lose a good recruiter. Maybe for several years or maybe forever. He is not the only coach UL has working in SF and in the end Charlie is the lead guy who signs the players. The program is doing well and they can find a new guy just as UK just found a whole new staff.

Kingrexchapman3 wrote: We all know that bridgewater is at Louisville because of his "relationship" with hurtt/shapiro. I doubt the ncaa comes down on louisville directly from all this, besides maybe getting rid of hurtt, but i think it will have a negative impact on recruiting. At least in the short term.
Im not sure why most louisville fans want to keep hurtt on staff. Its clear he was a big part of a huge scandal and has used dirty recruiting tactics to get the job done. Maybe they are afraid recruiting will fall off without hurtt. Cholly has openly praised him numerous times for getting players to louisville.
He seems like a liability to me.

jvolk wrote: Nothng new on this other than the the fact that the NCAA is ready to make thier case and start the final process. I know of no UL fans who ever felt Hurtt was innocent of all the stuff Shapario published and similar stuff. Too many coaches at the U involved and too much evidence to see anything else.

SQUASHBUGS wrote:

gocds12 wrote: Bad I'm not sure what UofL will do simply because I don't have any inside info; however, I could only guess that, as UK would do, that UofL would either cut him loose if the "show cause" is given to Clint Hurtt.  There has been speculation (rumors) that he might not be given the "show clause" because of his cooperation with the NCAA, but what do I know.  I'm not an NCAA rules expert, but I don't think this will have any effect on UofL directly or indirectly or any of it's players.  I would think that if UofL or any of it's players were to be affected that some of this info would have also leaked out just as this story is beginning to leak out.  As to the effect on current recruiting I simply don't know.

GO CARDS - BEAT EVERYBODY!!!                                    God Bless America!!!

Doesn't matter what anyone thinks. Hurtt will either resign or be told to pack. One thing Louisville has not done since Jurich arrived is play in the gret areas where the NCAA is concerned.

If his name is mentioned, after the rebuttal from him, and he is found to be complicit in any way, they will part company. Got to respect that about Jurich, like him or not.

SQUASHBUGS wrote:

Kingrexchapman3 wrote: We all know that bridgewater is at Louisville because of his "relationship" with hurtt/shapiro. I doubt the ncaa comes down on louisville directly from all this, besides maybe getting rid of hurtt, but i think it will have a negative impact on recruiting. At least in the short term.
Im not sure why most louisville fans want to keep hurtt on staff. Its clear he was a big part of a huge scandal and has used dirty recruiting tactics to get the job done. Maybe they are afraid recruiting will fall off without hurtt. Cholly has openly praised him numerous times for getting players to louisville.
He seems like a liability to me.

Get serious and quit being sanctimonious. We hired Cal when he had issues hanging over his head. He was cleared and it worked out.

Too many fans have short memories when it comes to rivals.

Kingrexchapman3 wrote: We all know that bridgewater is at Louisville because of his "relationship" with hurtt/shapiro. I doubt the ncaa comes down on louisville directly from all this, besides maybe getting rid of hurtt, but i think it will have a negative impact on recruiting. At least in the short term.
Im not sure why most louisville fans want to keep hurtt on staff. Its clear he was a big part of a huge scandal and has used dirty recruiting tactics to get the job done. Maybe they are afraid recruiting will fall off without hurtt. Cholly has openly praised him numerous times for getting players to louisville.
He seems like a liability to me.

gocds12 wrote: Bad I'm not sure what UofL will do simply because I don't have any inside info; however, I could only guess that, as UK would do, that UofL would either cut him loose if the "show cause" is given to Clint Hurtt.  There has been speculation (rumors) that he might not be given the "show clause" because of his cooperation with the NCAA, but what do I know.  I'm not an NCAA rules expert, but I don't think this will have any effect on UofL directly or indirectly or any of it's players.  I would think that if UofL or any of it's players were to be affected that some of this info would have also leaked out just as this story is beginning to leak out.  As to the effect on current recruiting I simply don't know.

GO CARDS - BEAT EVERYBODY!!!                                    God Bless America!!!

jvolk wrote: Nothng new on this other than the the fact that the NCAA is ready to make thier case and start the final process. I know of no UL fans who ever felt Hurtt was innocent of all the stuff Shapario published and similar stuff. Too many coaches at the U involved and too much evidence to see anything else. You guys act like Hurtt was the only coach involved and UL was different for keeping him in place. The leaks so far seem to show that there will coaches at UL, Bama, WKU, another basketball school and the Head basketball coach at Mizzou all named in this report. All are working except Hill who left Florida.

ONce the chanrges are announced the coaches & Miami will have 90 days to answer them in writing & plead their case Then at some point the NCAA will announce any penalities to Miami and the coaches within 4-6 months. Most expect some kind of penality for Hurtt.

THe bottom line is UL is not involved in any of this. The only player on the UL roster ever listed was at any point was that Bridgewater as a HS Junior was taken by the Shapario Suite for a few minutes with the current QB of UCF. The NCAA already already cleared Teddy to play on this issue 2 years ok. Hurtt has been under the microscope at UL and is clean. 

In the end the worst case for UL is we lose a good recruiter. Maybe for several years or maybe forever. He is not the only coach UL has working in SF and in the end Charlie is the lead guy who signs the players. The program is doing well and they can find a new guy just as UK just found a whole new staff.

SQUASHBUGS wrote:

Kingrexchapman3 wrote: We all know that bridgewater is at Louisville because of his "relationship" with hurtt/shapiro. I doubt the ncaa comes down on louisville directly from all this, besides maybe getting rid of hurtt, but i think it will have a negative impact on recruiting. At least in the short term.
Im not sure why most louisville fans want to keep hurtt on staff. Its clear he was a big part of a huge scandal and has used dirty recruiting tactics to get the job done. Maybe they are afraid recruiting will fall off without hurtt. Cholly has openly praised him numerous times for getting players to louisville.
He seems like a liability to me.

Get serious and quit being sanctimonious. We hired Cal when he had issues hanging over his head. He was cleared and it worked out.

Too many fans have short memories when it comes to rivals.

UKlaw82 wrote:

SQUASHBUGS wrote:

Kingrexchapman3 wrote: We all know that bridgewater is at Louisville because of his "relationship" with hurtt/shapiro. I doubt the ncaa comes down on louisville directly from all this, besides maybe getting rid of hurtt, but i think it will have a negative impact on recruiting. At least in the short term.
Im not sure why most louisville fans want to keep hurtt on staff. Its clear he was a big part of a huge scandal and has used dirty recruiting tactics to get the job done. Maybe they are afraid recruiting will fall off without hurtt. Cholly has openly praised him numerous times for getting players to louisville.
He seems like a liability to me.

Get serious and quit being sanctimonious. We hired Cal when he had issues hanging over his head. He was cleared and it worked out.

Too many fans have short memories when it comes to rivals.

You are dumber then a rock.

mcg48 wrote:

UKlaw82 wrote:

SQUASHBUGS wrote:

Kingrexchapman3 wrote: We all know that bridgewater is at Louisville because of his "relationship" with hurtt/shapiro. I doubt the ncaa comes down on louisville directly from all this, besides maybe getting rid of hurtt, but i think it will have a negative impact on recruiting. At least in the short term.
Im not sure why most louisville fans want to keep hurtt on staff. Its clear he was a big part of a huge scandal and has used dirty recruiting tactics to get the job done. Maybe they are afraid recruiting will fall off without hurtt. Cholly has openly praised him numerous times for getting players to louisville.
He seems like a liability to me.

Get serious and quit being sanctimonious. We hired Cal when he had issues hanging over his head. He was cleared and it worked out.

Too many fans have short memories when it comes to rivals.

You are dumber then a rock.

A comment from one of those rocks...

I'll hold off on judgement until all is over.  However, there is one heck of a lot of smoke.  If it's found he's done bad then I won't minimalize it, he's gotta go.

mcg48 wrote:

UKlaw82 wrote:

SQUASHBUGS wrote:

Kingrexchapman3 wrote: We all know that bridgewater is at Louisville because of his "relationship" with hurtt/shapiro. I doubt the ncaa comes down on louisville directly from all this, besides maybe getting rid of hurtt, but i think it will have a negative impact on recruiting. At least in the short term.
Im not sure why most louisville fans want to keep hurtt on staff. Its clear he was a big part of a huge scandal and has used dirty recruiting tactics to get the job done. Maybe they are afraid recruiting will fall off without hurtt. Cholly has openly praised him numerous times for getting players to louisville.
He seems like a liability to me.

Get serious and quit being sanctimonious. We hired Cal when he had issues hanging over his head. He was cleared and it worked out.

Too many fans have short memories when it comes to rivals.

You are dumber then a rock.

A comment from one of those rocks...

I'll hold off on judgement until all is over.  However, there is one heck of a lot of smoke.  If it's found he's done bad then I won't minimalize it, he's gotta go.