|
Excellent argument against high capacity mags
|
|
|
Posted: 1/17/2013 6:42 PM
Excellent argument against high capacity mags
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/17/2013 7:08 PM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
HAHA....it's the most ridiculous aspect of their argument.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/17/2013 7:32 PM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
Unreal. Wow.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/17/2013 7:47 PM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
It's all ridiculous. It's a liberal dog and pony show, and using the kids for political purposes is the apex of it.
"We HAVE to do something!"
"We did...we took mag capacity away from responsible people who wouldn't have used all those bullets anyway...because, uh...um...that's who the criminals are taking their cues from...and, uh, yeah..."
"Address the real issues? We are...the real issue is, all we really want to do is f**k with the people who don't vote for us." |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/17/2013 7:56 PM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
Just ordered 8 15 round magazines. hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha To all of DC.........................  |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/17/2013 8:49 PM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 12:24 AM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
So glad you posted that bit. Let's see, the same ones saying we need to enforce the laws we have (which we do), are the ones behind legislation preventing their enforcement.
It's true of both sides, but the double talk and bs is just rampant on the hill.
On another note, I saw where a recent poll showed 85% of NRA members support universal background checks but the NRA doesn't.
As long as we're going to bash Dems can we agree to rename the GOP the FOSP.
This sure aint Reagans GOP...not by a long shot.
Last edited 1/18/2013 12:26 AM by cgreg
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 7:19 AM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
What is "legislation preventing their enforcement"? I am not aware of such legislation which would prevent enforcement of current laws. NRA is not necessarily against 100% universal background checks but understand there will be a negotiation and being smart are not giving up anything at the beginning of the process. cgreg wrote: So glad you posted that bit. Let's see, the same ones saying we need to enforce the laws we have (which we do), are the ones behind legislation preventing their enforcement.
It's true of both sides, but the double talk and bs is just rampant on the hill.
On another note, I saw where a recent poll showed 85% of NRA members support universal background checks but the NRA doesn't.
As long as we're going to bash Dems can we agree to rename the GOP the FOSP.
This sure aint Reagans GOP...not by a long shot.
Last edited 1/18/2013 7:20 AM by clemsson
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 8:08 AM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
Watch the daily show clip in the link. Your typical politician bs.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 8:28 AM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
Can't watch it at work, but considering the source, I'd look for verification...
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 9:27 AM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
Uuhhhhhhhh
You don't even know what laws we're talking about because you don't know the laws, do you?
Cgreg you are a nice guy and all, even though you're a radical left winger, but man you can be a radical moron too.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 9:38 AM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
JRLAKE wrote: Uuhhhhhhhh
You don't even know what laws we're talking about because you don't know the laws, do you?
Cgreg you are a nice guy and all, even though you're a radical left winger, but man you can be a radical moron too. What was your 1st clue, JR???
WT |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 10:42 AM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
 11:51 am ET December 12, 2012 |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 11:11 AM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
TigersontheRock wrote: 11:51 am ET December 12, 2012 And just think, one armed guard could have saved every one of those innocent lives. But yet the libs are hell bent on trying to sell the American public on the ludicrous idea that banning flash supressors, pistol grips and 30 round magazines will save a single life. The saddest part is that the country is full of dumb a$$es that will buy into their agenda  |
|
Reply |
Quote |
- gardnesd
 - All-American
- 4087 posts this site
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 11:19 AM
RE: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
Gun Control was/is an underlying agenda for decades. Newtown just exposed a crisis that can't let go to waist.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 11:21 AM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
europasports wrote:
TigersontheRock wrote: 11:51 am ET December 12, 2012 And just think, one armed guard could have saved every one of those innocent lives. But yet the libs are hell bent on trying to sell the American public on the ludicrous idea that banning flash supressors, pistol grips and 30 round magazines will save a single life. The saddest part is that the country is full of dumb a$$es that will buy into their agenda No. The people who make the rules can't stand having protection for our children.... like they have for theirs.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- gardnesd
- All-American
- 4087 posts this site
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 11:22 AM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
Ammend the Constitution dude. Don't try to work your way around it. You wouldn't let people attack the 1st ammendment would you? cgreg wrote: So glad you posted that bit. Let's see, the same ones saying we need to enforce the laws we have (which we do), are the ones behind legislation preventing their enforcement.
It's true of both sides, but the double talk and bs is just rampant on the hill.
On another note, I saw where a recent poll showed 85% of NRA members support universal background checks but the NRA doesn't.
As long as we're going to bash Dems can we agree to rename the GOP the FOSP.
This sure aint Reagans GOP...not by a long shot. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 11:24 AM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
Actually BO put in for better security in schools.
18. Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 12:02 PM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
He did but at a cost to taxpayers of approximately $250K per resource officer. Great plan... IOP25 wrote: Actually BO put in for better security in schools.
18. Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2013 12:36 PM
Re: Excellent argument against high capacity mags
One armed guard, may or may not have been enough. A handgun vs someone with an AR isn't really a fair fight. Especially if he's caught off guard.
When you factor in the resources salary, benefits, equipment, etc I'm not surprised to see the price tag be that expensive. This is not the kinda job you want to be manned by a HS dropout..
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
