Mr. Santorum has repeated the following statement - or a form thereof - for several days on the campaign trail: "64 percent of those currently enrolled in a traditional four-year (college) have curbed their attendance habits."

He fails, however, to quote the next sentence: "Yet, 76 percent of those who never enrolled in college report a decline in religious service attendance."

So...your child is MORE likely to attend religous services if he/she attends college than if they do not.

For this, and so many other reasons, please, Republicans, please nominate this man for president.

http://religion.ssrc.org/refor...erus_Uecker.pdf

MarcWhit wrote: Mr. Santorum has repeated the following statement - or a form thereof - for several days on the campaign trail: "64 percent of those currently enrolled in a traditional four-year (college) have curbed their attendance habits."

He fails, however, to quote the next sentence: "Yet, 76 percent of those who never enrolled in college report a decline in religious service attendance."

So...your child is MORE likely to attend religous services if he/she attends college than if they do not.

For this, and so many other reasons, please, Republicans, please nominate this man for president.

http://religion.ssrc.org/refor...erus_Uecker.pdf

Don't worry Marc.  With the anti catholic Obama in office.....soon there will not be Catholic Universities and your man Obama can push the infanticide agenda forward.  Why do you post on the board of a Catholic school if you vote anti Catholic?  It is easy to see democrats hatred and anger toward Catholicism.....why is that? First step in socialism....kill the Catholic Church.  Didnt realize you were so willing to support Obama as he attacks the Church . http://www.lifesitenews.com/ne...rs-under-hhs-ma

"First, it suggests that antagonistic professors are having little effect on the religious faith of most students."

This research directly contradicts the Santorum thesis. So is it church teaching to ignore the truth when it's politically inconveniet? Don't you feel compelled to let the Santorum campaign know about this research? Or do you so love being the victim that you'll see what you want to see, believe what you want to believe.

orangejumpsuit wrote: "First, it suggests that antagonistic professors are having little effect on the religious faith of most students."

This research directly contradicts the Santorum thesis. So is it church teaching to ignore the truth when it's politically inconveniet? Don't you feel compelled to let the Santorum campaign know about this research? Or do you so love being the victim that you'll see what you want to see, believe what you want to believe.

Jumpy....I know you have your anger and hatred toward the right and Catholic Church.  This was not a comment on Santorum.(did you see me say that he was correct?) This was a comment on why someone that votes for someone that attacks the Catholic church continues to post on a Catholic schools board?  Obviously in your rush to spew your hatred toward Santorum....you missed this point.  Whatever Santorum said....is crumbs compared to what Obama is doing to the Catholic Church.  You realize that.....and yet you defend it?  Thats says all we need to know about you.  So sad.  I just wonder where your anger and hatred came from.  Please have the last word....I am on the side of the Catholic Church....so I have no need to hear your anger.  I will not even read your response.  But why the anger and hatred?  Why support the one who is trying to destroy the Church?  So sad.

Still no examples of what will do to attack the church the day after he is reelected.  So I will tell you -- nothing.  You war-on-the-church mongers have nothing until the Karl Rove and the like tell you what to believe and what to say. 

So what your saying about Santorum is that lying doesn't matter if your guy lies.  I've said I disagree with Obama on this policy but most people can see how he's used it to inspire a stream of political stupidity from the right.  Your response is just further evidence that your paranoia and anger is so present that you can't even engage.

Just one question -- I wonder what church teaching you draw from to say something like, "that's all we need to know about you."

orangejumpsuit wrote: Still no examples of what will do to attack the church the day after he is reelected.  So I will tell you -- nothing.  You war-on-the-church mongers have nothing until the Karl Rove and the like tell you what to believe and what to say. 

So what your saying about Santorum is that lying doesn't matter if your guy lies.  I've said I disagree with Obama on this policy but most people can see how he's used it to inspire a stream of political stupidity from the right.  Your response is just further evidence that your paranoia and anger is so present that you can't even engage.

Just one question -- I wonder what church teaching you draw from to say something like, "that's all we need to know about you."

You are a kook.

Is this how the church taught you to respond to people you disagree with? I'm concerned that you've lost you way.

---------------------------------------------
--- DukeWayne wrote:

orangejumpsuit wrote: Still no examples of what will do to attack the church the day after he is reelected.  So I will tell you -- nothing.  You war-on-the-church mongers have nothing until the Karl Rove and the like tell you what to believe and what to say. 

So what your saying about Santorum is that lying doesn't matter if your guy lies.  I've said I disagree with Obama on this policy but most people can see how he's used it to inspire a stream of political stupidity from the right.  Your response is just further evidence that your paranoia and anger is so present that you can't even engage.

Just one question -- I wonder what church teaching you draw from to say something like, "that's all we need to know about you."

You are a kook.

---------------------------------------------