gr8one1 wrote: We'll see if On is ready for a legit compromise this time.......in 2011 he had a deal with Boehener then upped the anti, wanting even more tax revenue.

My bet is that Ob will take a page from Alinski ("don't compromise with the enemy") and not give too much on tax rates, looking for complete GOP capitulation on that........the rank & file Republican House member would have non of that, meaning we go over the cliff temporarily.......that may force some give on both sides.

Ob is out to change our economic culture to a socialistic society.......can't afford that here as our military budget needs are too huge.......wouldn't work anyway, as it flies in the face of human nature.

Mutaman wrote:

gr8one1 wrote: We'll see if On is ready for a legit compromise this time.......in 2011 he had a deal with Boehener then upped the anti, wanting even more tax revenue.

My bet is that Ob will take a page from Alinski ("don't compromise with the enemy") and not give too much on tax rates, looking for complete GOP capitulation on that........the rank & file Republican House member would have non of that, meaning we go over the cliff temporarily.......that may force some give on both sides.

Ob is out to change our economic culture to a socialistic society.......can't afford that here as our military budget needs are too huge.......wouldn't work anyway, as it flies in the face of human nature.

Dude, you really need to stop getting your information from the Conservative Entertainment Complex. If I had been as wrong as you were about predicting the election, I would have seriously taken stock of what I was reading and listening to. (Actually I did do this after the 2000 election and it was a smart move.) Oh and maybe subscribe to a course in basic economics.  

Elections have consequences. Screw the plutocrats and the preachers and the wackos. You can't do business with anyone who would call Obama a "socialist" anyhow. Time for the adults to get tough. Let Paul Ryan deliver his home town in an election and then we might listen to what he has to say.

Mutaman wrote:

gr8one1 wrote: We'll see if On is ready for a legit compromise this time.......in 2011 he had a deal with Boehener then upped the anti, wanting even more tax revenue.

My bet is that Ob will take a page from Alinski ("don't compromise with the enemy") and not give too much on tax rates, looking for complete GOP capitulation on that........the rank & file Republican House member would have non of that, meaning we go over the cliff temporarily.......that may force some give on both sides.

Ob is out to change our economic culture to a socialistic society.......can't afford that here as our military budget needs are too huge.......wouldn't work anyway, as it flies in the face of human nature.

Dude, you really need to stop getting your information from the Conservative Entertainment Complex. If I had been as wrong as you were about predicting the election, I would have seriously taken stock of what I was reading and listening to. (Actually I did do this after the 2000 election and it was a smart move.) Oh and maybe subscribe to a course in basic economics.----Gallup and Rasmussen were wrong as well----anyway being wrong about a close election (only 330,000 votes collectively separated the two candidates in NH, Virginia, Ohio, Florida) is nothing to be ashamed of----BTW, I get my economic info from the VERY  best of sources.  

Elections have consequences. Screw the plutocrats and the preachers and the wackos. You can't do business with anyone who would call Obama a "socialist" anyhow. Time for the adults to get tough. Let Paul Ryan deliver his home town in an election and then we might listen to what he has to say.-----if you can't see that Ob is attempting to discreetly move this country into a socialist state (European Model)-----then you are not paying attention.

gr8one1 wrote:

Mutaman wrote:

gr8one1 wrote: We'll see if On is ready for a legit compromise this time.......in 2011 he had a deal with Boehener then upped the anti, wanting even more tax revenue.

My bet is that Ob will take a page from Alinski ("don't compromise with the enemy") and not give too much on tax rates, looking for complete GOP capitulation on that........the rank & file Republican House member would have non of that, meaning we go over the cliff temporarily.......that may force some give on both sides.

Ob is out to change our economic culture to a socialistic society.......can't afford that here as our military budget needs are too huge.......wouldn't work anyway, as it flies in the face of human nature.

Dude, you really need to stop getting your information from the Conservative Entertainment Complex. If I had been as wrong as you were about predicting the election, I would have seriously taken stock of what I was reading and listening to. (Actually I did do this after the 2000 election and it was a smart move.) Oh and maybe subscribe to a course in basic economics.----Gallup and Rasmussen were wrong as well----anyway being wrong about a close election (only 330,000 votes collectively separated the two candidates in NH, Virginia, Ohio, Florida)----I get my economic info from the VERY  best sources.  

Elections have consequences. Screw the plutocrats and the preachers and the wackos. You can't do business with anyone who would call Obama a "socialist" anyhow. Time for the adults to get tough. Let Paul Ryan deliver his home town in an election and then we might listen to what he has to say.-----if you can't see that Ob is attempting to discreetly move this country into a socialist state (European Model)-----then you are not paying attention.

gr8one1 wrote:

 

gr8one1 wrote: Gallup and Rasmussen were wrong as well----anyway being wrong about a close election 

DukeWayne wrote:

Much of my life has been dedicated to dealing with those who have problems such as yours, and I am only interested in your well being.

gr8one1 wrote: Romney lost NH by 40,000 votes, Virginia by 120,000, Ohio by 100,000 votes, Florida by 90,000...........comes to losing those 4 swing states by just 350,000 votes......had he won all 4, MR would have won the electoral college by 270 to 268.

Mutaman wrote:

gr8one1 wrote: Romney lost NH by 40,000 votes, Virginia by 120,000, Ohio by 100,000 votes, Florida by 90,000...........comes to losing those 4 swing states by just 350,000 votes......had he won all 4, MR would have won the electoral college by 270 to 268.

And if the Tigers had just scored a few more runs, and given up a few less, they would have swept the Giants in the World Series. You're living in the bubble buddy.

gr8one1 wrote:

 

But you said it wasn't close----just wanted to show you it was very close-----certainly not a mandate!

Skippy, could you tell me how much alcohol and marijuana you consume in any given day?  I am serious about this. I realize now that the person I am dealing with has serious mental impairment issues. Reading between the lines, the anger and the rage in your posts it is self evident and tells me that you are in serious need for detoxification/rehad.

You need to let your brain have a rest and remove the toxins in your head before something happens to yourself or someone else.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste, and from the looks of it your's is in imminent danger of an over load that will destroy what few cells that have not been damaged. 

gr8one1 wrote: I listen to the other point of view every afternoon-----Chris Matthews----

Mutaman wrote:

gr8one1 wrote: I listen to the other point of view every afternoon-----Chris Matthews----

He's an idiot. Why are you wasting your time with this?

gr8one1 wrote: I agree Chris Matthews a poltical "idiot".

gr8one1 wrote: Romney lost NH by 40,000 votes, Virginia by 120,000, Ohio by 100,000 votes, Florida by 90,000...........comes to losing those 4 swing states by just 350,000 votes......had he won all 4, MR would have won the electoral college by 270 to 268.

Mutaman wrote:

gr8one1 wrote: I agree Chris Matthews a poltical "idiot".

So then why do you spend "every afternoon" listening to him?