Posted: 2/1/2013 8:52 PM

Two very interesting articles 

Last edited 2/1/2013 8:53 PM by bearcatvol

Posted: 2/1/2013 11:59 PM

Re: Two very interesting articles 

we're scrappy.    Thanks.

USF's president sounds like she has it together, she's not cowering.  Scrappy conference, always pushing.

Last edited 2/2/2013 12:04 AM by cincykid

Posted: 2/3/2013 12:57 AM

Re: Two very interesting articles 

Inviting TULANE ...got the catholic Seven fired up.....and out...was it worth it...????...

Posted: 2/3/2013 10:06 AM

Re: Two very interesting articles 

brell wrote: Inviting TULANE ...got the catholic Seven fired up.....and out...was it worth it...????...

Yes, but much, much, much too late - forget Tulane, should have gone separate ways 3-4 years ago.  More then a "little" late now! 

Posted: 2/3/2013 10:10 AM

Re: Two very interesting articles 

If that is true then why did all of the C7 schools vote "yes" to admit Tulane? Per Aresco the vote to admit Tulane was a unanimous 10-0.



---------------------------------------------
--- brell wrote:

Inviting TULANE ...got the catholic Seven fired up.....and out...was it worth it...????...

---------------------------------------------

Posted: 2/3/2013 10:19 AM

Re: Two very interesting articles 

Posted: 2/3/2013 11:27 AM

Re: Two very interesting articles 

mptnstrat44 wrote: By the point the Tulane vote took place, the C7 already knew they were leaving the BE together (they'd been having talks behind the scenes well before they announced they were all leaving together), so they didn't care if Tulane was admitted and went ahead and voted yes.

Exactly!  But, I thought UC abstained.  That would have made it 9-0-1, correct?

Anyway, Tulane might not prove such a bad addition.  Now that the BE is on the other side of the fence, we need a "bitcher-moaner" type like Cowen to "set the power 5 straight"

Posted: 2/5/2013 8:32 AM

RE: Two very interesting articles 

Last edited 2/5/2013 8:32 AM by eerodynamic