Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 4  Next >

MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2

Avatar

Posted: 10/2/2012 7:43 AM

MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 


Mat Latos (13‐4, 3.60) vs. Chris Carpenter (0‐1, 3.27). 7:15 PM CT. FOX Sports Midwest and KMOX.

Cards magic number = 1
Brian Walton
The Cardinal Nation and The Cardinal Nation blog
Follow both Brian and TCN on Twitter
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/2/2012 8:50 AM

RE: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 


We CRUSH Latos. That trend should continue. Meanwhile, the Reds offense is sputtering.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/2/2012 9:04 AM

RE: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 



DMENS wrote: We CRUSH Latos. That trend should continue. Meanwhile, the Reds offense is sputtering.
I'm wary of making predictions based on past performance against a certain pitcher.  The Cardinals have had success against Latos, but that doesn't mean they will every time.  The Reds offense has cooled off, but they are motivated by their desire to knock us out of the playoffs, and our offense is not consistent.  Anything can happen and I will be nervous about the outcome.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/2/2012 9:13 AM

RE: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 



crdswmn wrote:
I'm wary of making predictions based on past performance against a certain pitcher.  The Cardinals have had success against Latos, but that doesn't mean they will every time.  The Reds offense has cooled off, but they are motivated by their desire to knock us out of the playoffs, and our offense is not consistent.  Anything can happen and I will be nervous about the outcome.
But you are more apt to make a prediction based on an abstract concept of the Reds being motivated to beat their rival? I'm not guaranteeing a victory or anything, just pointing out that Latos has a bad track record against the Cardinals.

It's strange how we cower at the thought of Bud Norris because of his ability to pitch so well against us, then when we have a favorable matchup, discount the same sort of history as if it doesn't matter. It works both ways. And that's not a comment directed at you specifically, just a thought on the mental gymnastics people use to temper their own expectations for the hometown team.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/2/2012 9:21 AM

RE: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 



DMENS wrote:
crdswmn wrote:
I'm wary of making predictions based on past performance against a certain pitcher.  The Cardinals have had success against Latos, but that doesn't mean they will every time.  The Reds offense has cooled off, but they are motivated by their desire to knock us out of the playoffs, and our offense is not consistent.  Anything can happen and I will be nervous about the outcome.
But you are more apt to make a prediction based on an abstract concept of the Reds being motivated to beat their rival? I'm not guaranteeing a victory or anything, just pointing out that Latos has a bad track record against the Cardinals.

It's strange how we cower at the thought of Bud Norris because of his ability to pitch so well against us, then when we have a favorable matchup, discount the same sort of history as if it doesn't matter. It works both ways. And that's not a comment directed at you specifically, just a thought on the mental gymnastics people use to temper their own expectations for the hometown team.
I don't buy into the Bud Norris thing either.  And yes, I think sometimes players  up their play a notch or two with the right motivation.  How do you explain the  Cubs' ability to lose 100 games, but play us like it's the World Series?  And they do it consistently.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/2/2012 9:38 AM

RE: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 



crdswmn wrote:
I don't buy into the Bud Norris thing either.  And yes, I think sometimes players  up their play a notch or two with the right motivation.  How do you explain the  Cubs' ability to lose 100 games, but play us like it's the World Series?  And they do it consistently.
Do you think we've hit Latos so well before because he wasn't motivated then? Is he now so much more motivated that he will be able to distance himself from a 1-4 record / 10.24 ERA? Maybe he has a good day and we have a bad one, but it isn't far fetched to like our odds.

Also, it might seem like the Cubs play us as if it were the World Series, but over the last four years we have gone 36-27 against them. So that motivation hasn't exactly churned out a glorious track record. Even though the human element of motivation does play a significant role, I'll still take matchup over motivation any day.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/2/2012 9:41 AM

Re: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 


Whats the weather like in St. Louis, whats the forecast for the game tonight?

Rat
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/2/2012 9:43 AM

Re: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 



RatsBuddy wrote: Whats the weather like in St. Louis, whats the forecast for the game tonight?

Rat
Very similar to last night. Cloudy, cool, and a little breezy. Bundle up if you're headed to the game. Last night I got pretty chilly in just a long-sleeve and jersey. A few showers might move in later in the evening. Ah, October baseball.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/2/2012 10:08 AM

RE: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 



DMENS wrote:
crdswmn wrote:
I don't buy into the Bud Norris thing either.  And yes, I think sometimes players  up their play a notch or two with the right motivation.  How do you explain the  Cubs' ability to lose 100 games, but play us like it's the World Series?  And they do it consistently.
Do you think we've hit Latos so well before because he wasn't motivated then? Is he now so much more motivated that he will be able to distance himself from a 1-4 record / 10.24 ERA? Maybe he has a good day and we have a bad one, but it isn't far fetched to like our odds.

Also, it might seem like the Cubs play us as if it were the World Series, but over the last four years we have gone 36-27 against them. So that motivation hasn't exactly churned out a glorious track record. Even though the human element of motivation does play a significant role, I'll still take matchup over motivation any day.

As bad as the Cubs have been in the last 4 years, 27 losses to them to me is a significant amount----way more than talent should have dictated.

And I don't think motivation plays into Latos' performance against us, good or bad.  I think that on any given day, factors such as better pitching mechanics and external factors such as weather and even umpiring can create a situation where a pitcher can defy his past record.   Are the chances high that the Cardinals will have continued success against Latos?  Sure.  Is it a given?  Heck no.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/2/2012 10:36 AM

RE: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 



crdswmn wrote:
DMENS wrote:
crdswmn wrote:
I don't buy into the Bud Norris thing either.  And yes, I think sometimes players  up their play a notch or two with the right motivation.  How do you explain the  Cubs' ability to lose 100 games, but play us like it's the World Series?  And they do it consistently.
Do you think we've hit Latos so well before because he wasn't motivated then? Is he now so much more motivated that he will be able to distance himself from a 1-4 record / 10.24 ERA? Maybe he has a good day and we have a bad one, but it isn't far fetched to like our odds.

Also, it might seem like the Cubs play us as if it were the World Series, but over the last four years we have gone 36-27 against them. So that motivation hasn't exactly churned out a glorious track record. Even though the human element of motivation does play a significant role, I'll still take matchup over motivation any day.

As bad as the Cubs have been in the last 4 years, 27 losses to them to me is a significant amount----way more than talent should have dictated.

And I don't think motivation plays into Latos' performance against us, good or bad.  I think that on any given day, factors such as better pitching mechanics and external factors such as weather and even umpiring can create a situation where a pitcher can defy his past record.   Are the chances high that the Cardinals will have continued success against Latos?  Sure.  Is it a given?  Heck no.

As far as past pitching performance goes it is my belief that external factors play an equal role as talent does when it comes to matchups. The home plate umpire can just about dictate what pitches a hurler throws as far as location. We saw this on saturday where the ump was so inconsistent neither pitcher knew where the strike zone was. I thought it was the worst officiated game of the year that i have seen. Weather and back drop also play a part in how a hurler feels and what he sees. Some are better than others at tuning these things out. Another factor might also be the hitting teams game play. Do they take pitches and sit on a certain offering or are they swinging early trying to get fat fastballs to pull. I do not think any of it is random therefore past performance is an indicator just like all the metrics but on any given day anything can happen. There is no figuring it though b/c all of these non random factors converge to produce a completely random result. See Cubs v.s St.Louis.

GO CARDS!
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/2/2012 10:51 AM

Re: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 


This is the clincher.

Thank you seniors for your hard work and dedication. Champions in our minds, and champions in our hearts.
12-0

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/2/2012 11:22 AM

Re: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 



bucknutjake wrote: This is the clincher.
Umm, four word thread?

GO CARDS!
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/2/2012 11:49 AM

Re: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 



cardinalnationhouston wrote:
bucknutjake wrote: This is the clincher.
Umm, four word thread?

Wait until it's over.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/2/2012 12:33 PM

RE: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 



crdswmn wrote:
DMENS wrote: We CRUSH Latos. That trend should continue. Meanwhile, the Reds offense is sputtering.
I'm wary of making predictions based on past performance against a certain pitcher.  The Cardinals have had success against Latos, but that doesn't mean they will every time.  The Reds offense has cooled off, but they are motivated by their desire to knock us out of the playoffs, and our offense is not consistent.  Anything can happen and I will be nervous about the outcome.
exactly. we crush zimmerman too, but look what he did the other day. not to mention jackson tends to pitch good against us, but the day before that we got to him quick.

any given day, no telling what will happen.

i just know carp pitching the playoff bound deciding game would be awesome. getting his first win in that position would energize the team. as well as hopefully get him rolling for great performances in the next round.
---
Need help with Community Prospect voting? Click here to find links for stats & draft positions for everyone in the Cardinal minor league system: Minor League Affiliates | cardinals.com: Minors
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/2/2012 1:13 PM

Re: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 


We win and we kiss the Dodgers goodbye. Can end all this right meow!biggrin

 Suggested U. of Illinois mascots

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/2/2012 5:02 PM

Re: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 


How fitting is it that Carpenter is starting the potential clincher? He was in this position last year and we all know what happened. This is our guy right here even though he is just getting back. I am calling this one 5-2 for St.Louis with Holliday getting the big knock. excitedexcitedexcited

GO CARDS!
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/2/2012 5:24 PM

Re: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 



cardinalnationhouston wrote: How fitting is it that Carpenter is starting the potential clincher? He was in this position last year and we all know what happened. This is our guy right here even though he is just getting back. I am calling this one 5-2 for St.Louis with Holliday getting the big knock. excitedexcitedexcited
Yet another huge start for him.

I just ask for 6 innings. He does that then he's done all he can do. Then it's up to Mujica, Boggs and Motte...

 Suggested U. of Illinois mascots

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/2/2012 6:54 PM

Re: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 


If we clinch should there be a celebration?

I mean we still have another 2 games to play and have to play for the right to just keep playing.

 Suggested U. of Illinois mascots

Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/2/2012 7:31 PM

Re: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 


Long first inning for Carp.  Hope right now he gets through five.

Mujica has pitched three nights in a row. I wonder if he's even available tonight.  I can't find a time when he's worked four days in a row this year.

Boggs has gone three nights in a row, too. I don't see a four day stretch of his use this year, either.

Could well be a Kelly/Rosenthal/Zep sort of night.  It would be awfully nice if we could build a nice cushion....
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/2/2012 7:39 PM

Re: MLB game 161 thread: Reds at Cards: Tue 10/2 


Sac fly for Holliday plates Jay.  1-0 Cards.  Run an inning, guys?

Quick first out for Carp in the 2nd.

I'll be multitasking again tonight, so no PBP.
Reply | Quote
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 4  Next >