|
Re: 2009 Dodgers (Offseason Moves) Cont.
|
|
|
Posted: 01/19/2009 1:40 PM
Re: 2009 Dodgers (Offseason Moves) Cont.
The Dodgers have known it was Manny or bust all along. They're not afraid to start the season with an OF of Pierre, Kemp, Ethier if neither side blinks. Add in the fact that there's pretty much no market for Manny and that puts the Dodgers firmly in the driver's seat.
There's no reason to hurry. The Dodgers have offered a deal already... not one team tries to match it. The Giants have come up but it sounds like a typical business move to jack up the price for us. IF they offer a deal, the Dodgers will either match or let him go, depending on whether or not they think the deal is fair of course. In the end though, as long as the Giants don't offer up a 4 year deal in the 100million dollar range, Manny's comin back to Hollywood. We need him and he needs us.
It's mid January and ST is only a month away, but we can't change gears now.
Sign Pettitte 1 year/11 million Sign Manny 2 year/46 million with 3rd year club option for 24 million
We're actually in a pretty good position to make it happen too.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 01/19/2009 2:50 PM
Re: 2009 Dodgers (Offseason Moves) Cont.
" 'The one thing that's puzzling to me is the lack of communication,' the Dodgers owner said Saturday night at a benefit for the Professional Baseball Scouts Foundation at the Hyatt Century Plaza Hotel in Los Angeles. 'There's a few issues that can't be resolved without communication.' The Dodgers made a two-year, $45 million offer to Ramirez in October. Boras, seeking a five-year deal, didn't reply to it. And the Dodgers withdrew the offer. But Ramirez has apparently received no other offers, and Boras' people last talked to Dodgers general manager Ned Colletti early last week. 'Everyone knows we want to have Manny back. We've tried to make it very clear,' McCourt said. 'I certainly hope that message has been delivered to the player by now.' As for the parameters of the offer, McCourt said, 'I always feel there's room for discussion.' " http://blogs.pe.com/prosports/mlb/dodgers/As suspected, McCourt verifies that Boras is really the one stalling the negotiations as he is trying to bait some team into bidding against the Dodgers. The Giants payroll is currently higher than the Dodgers payroll. They don't have the budget to sign Manny. If the Yankees trade away some dead weight like Matsui, they won't be in it. The Angels or the Mets are the only likely suitors but both have stated publically that Manny is not at all in their plans. Boras should eat some crow and come to the table already and agree to a 3-yr deal.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 01/19/2009 5:33 PM
Re: 2009 Dodgers (Offseason Moves) Cont.
"The Dodgers are in a "position to pounce" on a few free agents. Their payroll currently sits in the low $70MM range, leaving about $30-$40MM in flexibility. Manny Ramirez is obviously their primary target, but the boys in blue might also be on the lookout for a high-end starter or reliever." http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/I guess the fans have to consider that the Dodgers are one of the few teams w/ the cash to make moves on some late signing bargains. Every team is wanting to do that but most have very little to work with. I would rather the Dodgers make no moves that anymore reclamation moves. I say Wolf, Pettite and Manny Ramirez can be had for the remaining budget. McDonald would be in the bullpen and the whole team world look pretty solid. One thing I would like to see the Dodgers do is make reclamation cheap pickups like the Marlins made w/ Jorge Cantu and Dallas McPherson, two guys w/ huge seasons last year.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 01/19/2009 5:34 PM
Re: 2009 Dodgers (Offseason Moves) Cont.
If Boras has dragged this thing this far, I really wouldn't be surprised to see him drag it out all the way to the end of the WBC, especially if Manny is going to participate for the Dominican Republic. Where he could get into baseball form without having to report for ST. I guess his hope would be that some high profile LFer/DH gets hurt and then he could start some interest that way. I have no problems with players hiring agents that will seek what is in their best interest; however, it is times like these that causes me to lose respect for people like Boras. Not because I am a Dodger fan, but because I operate under a completely different level of ethics and morals. It is one thing not to agree on terms, but it is a completely different issue when you don't even acknowledge a potential client. Quite frankly I'd rather have someone stipulate what they want and then end the conversation, but to arrogantly ignore and undermine the highest management level of an organization, is an action that most of us would find to be unacceptable out here in the real world. Boras needs to wake up and understand that his requests may be a bit unreasonable, but then again there have been owners who fall into his trap; i.e. the NYY and the BoSox. So at the end of the day, it is the fault of those very same owners that end up paying for these guys who are at the center stage of this process.
There is my Manny rant of the day.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 01/19/2009 5:37 PM
Re: 2009 Dodgers (Offseason Moves) Cont.
^^^^ I don't think Manny/Boras will sign any deal that has a club option in it, not unless it's ridiculously above market value in $$$. Boras wants all the options to be on his side, not the team's. Manny made an ass of himself just to get rid of the two club options in his old contract. They'll agree to a one-year deal and try FA again next year before they will agree to club options.
Last edited 01/19/2009 5:38 PM by LeeDorm8185
|
|
|
|
Posted: 01/19/2009 6:08 PM
Re: 2009 Dodgers (Offseason Moves) Cont.
In a way I understand Boras/Manny's position. The Dodgers offered 2 years and they are looking for 5 years; however, I also understand the Dodgers, no one is coming near the 5 years, so why offer more? The main problem here is that much like the real estate market, some homes are listed higher than they are worth; however, some owners are not pressed to make a sale. Now, this is where I understand Manny's and Boras position, if the Dodgers like the property and need the property, they are going to have to make an offer that is going to have to bring that owner, who is not in need of saling their property, to the table. However, offering market value is just not going to get it done. Now, the Dodgers may perceive that the owner is having a rough time holding on; the biggenst issue is that I think Manny is crazy enough to wait as long as it takes. In effort not to sell himself too short, it really wouldn't surprise me if goes a different route and ends up playing on a 1-year deal to the highest bidder. Posting huge numbers and then revisiting the FA market next season. The guy is talented enough to find success that way. This is why I believe that if the Dodgers wish to keep Manny "semi-happy" they need to make what some consider to be a serious offer, and that is a 3-year offer. I believe Manny will be chasing history by then. A 3 year deal may not be a bad thing IMO.
|
|
- ShinyTop
- Ogden Raptors
- 97 posts this site
|
Posted: 01/19/2009 6:36 PM
RE: 2009 Dodgers (Offseason Moves) Cont.
I would offer 5 years if part of the deal was Boras retiring. We could even get all the other teams to contribute!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 01/19/2009 7:05 PM
Re: 2009 Dodgers (Offseason Moves) Cont.
Dodgfan wrote: In a way I understand Boras/Manny's position. The Dodgers offered 2 years and they are looking for 5 years; however, I also understand the Dodgers, no one is coming near the 5 years, so why offer more? The main problem here is that much like the real estate market, some homes are listed higher than they are worth; however, some owners are not pressed to make a sale. Now, this is where I understand Manny's and Boras position, if the Dodgers like the property and need the property, they are going to have to make an offer that is going to have to bring that owner, who is not in need of saling their property, to the table. However, offering market value is just not going to get it done. Now, the Dodgers may perceive that the owner is having a rough time holding on; the biggenst issue is that I think Manny is crazy enough to wait as long as it takes. In effort not to sell himself too short, it really wouldn't surprise me if goes a different route and ends up playing on a 1-year deal to the highest bidder. Posting huge numbers and then revisiting the FA market next season. The guy is talented enough to find success that way. This is why I believe that if the Dodgers wish to keep Manny "semi-happy" they need to make what some consider to be a serious offer, and that is a 3-year offer. I believe Manny will be chasing history by then. A 3 year deal may not be a bad thing IMO. Boras already stated that the dollars/year is not the problem, it is the length of the contract. Current value based on the economy and what other OF are gettting is about $15 million/yr. (more than double what Burrel got and 1/3 more than Bradley got) for Manny so the Dodgers offering Manny more than market value in exchange for a short term contract. The Dodgers initial offer was thought at first to be an insult but infact was very fair in hindsight and actually set the bar. No one would dare after that offer a contract for less than $20 million per year to Boras for Manny as that would be seen as an insult, hence no other offer. Had the Dodgers not made that initial offer, I'd bet that someone, probably the Giants, would have offered Manny a 3-yr $45 million w/ possibly a 4th yr. option for $15 million.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 01/19/2009 7:35 PM
RE: 2009 Dodgers (Offseason Moves) Cont.
The Dodgers continued their negotiations with Manny Ramirez today, but don’t appear to be any closer to re-signing the All-Star outfielder. “Just checking in,” General Manager Ned Colletti said of his 15-minute phone conversation with Ramirez’s agent, Scott Boras. “We had a conversation,” Boras said. Ramirez is still looking for a four-year contract with an option for a fifth year, while the Dodgers have in mind something closer to the two-year, $45-million deal they offer him in November. The Dodgers don’t have an offer on the table at this time. With Ramirez’s landing place far from decided, the Dodgers are focused on acquiring pitching. They are most interested in Randy Wolf and Jon Garland, and are looking at Braden Looper as a fallback. latimesblogs.latimes.com/sport...rs-continu.html
|
|
|
|
Posted: 01/19/2009 8:57 PM
RE: 2009 Dodgers (Offseason Moves) Cont.
The only worry I have is that Coletti gets tired of waiting and grabs Dunn or Abreu and the Giants being the only team left, get Manny for an even better deal.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 01/19/2009 10:28 PM
Re: 2009 Dodgers (Offseason Moves) Cont.
Dodgfan wrote: If Boras has dragged this thing this far, I really wouldn't be surprised to see him drag it out all the way to the end of the WBC, especially if Manny is going to participate for the Dominican Republic. Where he could get into baseball form without having to report for ST. I guess his hope would be that some high profile LFer/DH gets hurt and then he could start some interest that way. I have no problems with players hiring agents that will seek what is in their best interest; however, it is times like these that causes me to lose respect for people like Boras. Not because I am a Dodger fan, but because I operate under a completely different level of ethics and morals. It is one thing not to agree on terms, but it is a completely different issue when you don't even acknowledge a potential client. Quite frankly I'd rather have someone stipulate what they want and then end the conversation, but to arrogantly ignore and undermine the highest management level of an organization, is an action that most of us would find to be unacceptable out here in the real world. Boras needs to wake up and understand that his requests may be a bit unreasonable, but then again there have been owners who fall into his trap; i.e. the NYY and the BoSox. So at the end of the day, it is the fault of those very same owners that end up paying for these guys who are at the center stage of this process.
There is my Manny rant of the day. It would be extremely risky for Manny to go into the WBC without a contract. I would bet Boras would even advise against such action. If Manny gets hurt playing in the WBC he risks losing alot of money this season and possibly beyond. Tx
|
|
|
|
Posted: 01/20/2009 3:10 AM
RE: 2009 Dodgers (Offseason Moves) Cont.
caseyatbt wrote: The only worry I have is that Coletti gets tired of waiting and grabs Dunn or Abreu and the Giants being the only team left, get Manny for an even better deal. With a rumor tonight that the Dunn market has collapsed to the point that he is getting offers of $5 million a year, perhaps Ned will just move forward on Dunn if a discount offer is really available on him. Dunn at three years $27 million or less would be bargain.
|
|