Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
Inbox
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 2  Next >

Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo

Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 12:26 PM

Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


The Kansas City Royals have declined 2010 options for outfielder Coco Crisp, catcher Miguel Olivo and right-handed pitcher Yasuhiko Yabuta.  Crisp and Olivo are now eligible to file for free agency.  Yabuta can elect free agency if he doesn’t sign a 2010 Major League contract with the Royals by November 16.

Reply | Quote
  • Creightonfan1
  • Omaha Royal
  • Rating: 2.7/5 this site
  • 544 posts this site
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 12:29 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


If John Buck is our catcher, I'm going to stab someone!

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 12:30 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


 

Creightonfan1 wrote:

If John Buck is our catcher, I'm going to stab someone!


Are you going to stab John Buck?

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 12:31 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


Teahen - 4 mill

Olivo - approx 4 mil.

Yabuta - 4 mil.

Crisp - neg. 500k

 

did we just save 11.5 million?

 

and dear god...did we just give the starting job BACK to Buck?

Reply | Quote
  • Creightonfan1
  • Omaha Royal
  • Rating: 2.7/5 this site
  • 544 posts this site
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 12:33 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo Post Rating (1 vote)


 

ChiTownRoyalsFan wrote:

 

Creightonfan1 wrote:

If John Buck is our catcher, I'm going to stab someone!


Are you going to stab John Buck?

I'm going to cut the back of his hamstring... He will start pushing everything to the right... He'll quit the game!

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 12:36 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


 

Creightonfan1 wrote:

 

ChiTownRoyalsFan wrote:

 

Creightonfan1 wrote:

If John Buck is our catcher, I'm going to stab someone!


Are you going to stab John Buck?

I'm going to cut the back of his hamstring... He will start pushing everything to the right... He'll quit the game!


<img src="http://www.80sreborn.com/images/caddyshack-2.jpg"/>

 

 

edit: ok what did i do wrong here?

Last edited 11/6/2009 12:36 PM by KennyPowers

Reply | Quote

Posted: 11/6/2009 12:37 PM

RE: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


With the talk about Bryan Pena a few weeks ago from DM, could we expect to see Pena as our opening day catcher?
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 12:38 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo Post Rating (9 votes)


What?!?!?  KK knows EVERYTHING about the Royals, and he guaranteed we'd bring back Olivo multiple times in every gameday thread last season.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 12:40 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo Post Rating (1 vote)


 

RoyalsChristopher wrote:

What?!?!?  KK knows EVERYTHING about the Royals, and he guaranteed we'd bring back Olivo multiple times in every gameday thread last season.


Glad to be wrong. Hopefully Jacobs is next.

Last edited 11/6/2009 12:41 PM by KingKirkpatrick

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 12:45 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo Post Rating (1 vote)


 

KennyPowers wrote:

Teahen - 4 mill

Olivo - approx 4 mil.

Yabuta - 4 mil.

Crisp - neg. 500k

 

did we just save 11.5 million?

 

and dear god...did we just give the starting job BACK to Buck?

I don't think you can look at it like that. Crisp, Yabuta and Olivo weren't coming back, so their overall contracts probably never figured into the discussion in the 2010 budget.  By my rough calculations, even with the buyouts of the options, the Royals were going to be on the hook for around $80 million in 2010.  That was before the Teahen deal.

 

We do know the Royals owe Crisp $500,000, Olivo $100,000 and Yabuta $500,000.  And we know the Royals sent cash to the White Sox in the Teahen deal - we just don't know how much.  So for now, we're paying over $1 million to four players who are not playing on our team.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 12:53 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


this does not mean that Olivo is gone though...

 

so he could be back

RoyalsChristopher wrote:

What?!?!?  KK knows EVERYTHING about the Royals, and he guaranteed we'd bring back Olivo multiple times in every gameday thread last season.

 

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 12:59 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


with olivo wanting a long term deal, and reports he wants to hit a weak catchers market...i'd have to expect he is gone..

Reply | Quote
  • KCchen
  • NW Arkansas Natural
  • Rating: 2.9/5 this site
  • 454 posts this site
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 1:04 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


 

KennyPowers wrote:

with olivo wanting a long term deal, and reports he wants to hit a weak catchers market...i'd have to expect he is gone..

I expect a sweet draft pickbiggrin

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 1:13 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


 

tanana wrote:

this does not mean that Olivo is gone though...

 

so he could be back

RoyalsChristopher wrote:

What?!?!?  KK knows EVERYTHING about the Royals, and he guaranteed we'd bring back Olivo multiple times in every gameday thread last season.

 

A number of us have been saying this for awhile, that the Royals would decline Olvio's 2010 option and offer him arb (as long as they hear serious rumblings about other teams having interest in signing Olivo) in hopes of picking up a supplemental draft pick next year.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 1:28 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


 

KennyPowers wrote:

Teahen - 4 mill

Olivo - approx 4 mil.

Yabuta - 4 mil.

Crisp - neg. 500k

 

did we just save 11.5 million?

 

and dear god...did we just give the starting job BACK to Buck?

I believe I've been seeing stuff that we are going in a completely different direction on this and getting rid of both Buck and Olivo (thing is Olivo was likely never going to sign with us) so I assume that we declinced the option to pay him $100K so we could offer arb so that we would get a supplemental pick when he goes, correct?  or otherwise not picking up the option doesn't make sense if you are pretty certain he's going on the free agent market.

 

So given the weak market, are we planning for a Pena starting catcher and Pina as the backup?

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 1:37 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo Post Rating (2 votes)


 

RoyalsChristopher wrote:

What?!?!?  KK knows EVERYTHING about the Royals, and he guaranteed we'd bring back Olivo multiple times in every gameday thread last season.

True, and KK also knows that Buck is a league average catcher, basestealing doesn't matter anyway, so Buck is perfectly fine, and will retire as a Royal after 15 seasons posting a .225 batting average and throwing out 8% of baserunners (those who trip or are mocking him on the way to 2nd). The Teahen fantasy is gone, but Buck will never go away.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 1:39 PM

Re: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


 

TheRealElGuapo wrote:

 

RoyalsChristopher wrote:

What?!?!?  KK knows EVERYTHING about the Royals, and he guaranteed we'd bring back Olivo multiple times in every gameday thread last season.

True, and KK also knows that Buck is a league average catcher, basestealing doesn't matter anyway, so Buck is perfectly fine, and will retire as a Royal after 15 seasons posting a .225 batting average and throwing out 8% of baserunners (those who trip or are mocking him on the way to 2nd). The Teahen fantasy is gone, but Buck will never go away.

I want both Buck and Olivo gone. I have made that perfectly clear. I think Buck is better than Olivo, but they both suck.

Reply | Quote
  • dls357
  • NW Arkansas Natural
  • Rating: 3.0/5 this site
  • 470 posts this site

Posted: 11/6/2009 1:45 PM

RE: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


What's that rule about offering a player arbitration, then cutting him in Spring Training for about 1/6th his salary. (Like they did with German and Gobble last year.) Maybe that's what they have in mind with Buck. Keep him around and keep looking for something better.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 1:50 PM

RE: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


Are they ever going to fix the arb process?  Some guys get bigger contracts in arb than they would in free agency.  Nobody would pay $5M+ for Mark Teahen on the open market yet he stands to earn that in arb.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/6/2009 2:13 PM

RE: Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo 


IMO the Royals must have a deal in the works for Buck. He and Olivo are the same festering mess but with different stenches... The one thing working for these two is that there are very few hitting catchers, let alone good young catchers. Any of them that can hit are switched over to another position to improve their hitting output.  Pena can hit and we can get a back-up for less than what Buck-o will cost.

 

Either way, if Buck doesn't follow Olivo out of KC, DM should have his head examined.

Imagine if Teahen were to add catcher to his resume? A catcher who hits left handed and to the opposite field...

Last edited 11/6/2009 2:14 PM by charlie319

Reply | Quote
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 2  Next >