|
Frenchy speaks
|
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 10:15 AM
Frenchy speaks
"Last year just flat-out sucked... why did we trade Myers? You know, I'd probably say the same damn thing if I was on the outside looking in."
Amusing read, if for nothing else than Frenchy recognizing how bad he was, how unhappy the fans are with him, and complete with hilariously reiterative "best shape of my life, reworking my swing, will come out swinging" lines.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 10:30 AM
Re: Frenchy speaks
Well here is to hoping that he is better. I don't think we have many options right now without moving some more minor league talent.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 10:53 AM
RE: Frenchy speaks
Didn't someone identify that his swing has actually slowed down and that's why he misses more than he used to? Seems he could open up a little and get ahead of some pitches he missed so often last year. I see very little "adjustment" in him under Seitzer...so I'm game to see if our new dynamic duo hitting coaches can fix him...but not holding my breath.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 11:01 AM
RE: Frenchy speaks
Is anybody else fearful that Frenchy rebounds to something approaching his 2011 season causing Dayton to ink him to something like a 3 year, $21 million deal? I want him to have a decent season next year because you just can't keep throwing a black hole in RF every day, but Francoeur needs to be on his merry way out of KC next fall.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 11:15 AM
RE: Frenchy speaks
desertclone wrote: Is anybody else fearful that Frenchy rebounds to something approaching his 2011 season causing Dayton to ink him to something like a 3 year, $21 million deal? I want him to have a decent season next year because you just can't keep throwing a black hole in RF every day, but Francoeur needs to be on his merry way out of KC next fall. I agree in general. I don't want him to suck horribly, because that loses us games. But....what are we going to replace him with? I don't see many other options coming up the pipeline. In short...I see him getting inked to a deal even if he's not one of the worst position players in baseball next year. Because while I might personally approve of something along the lines of Cain moving to RF and Dyson playing CF in 2014, I don't see any evidence that our GM shares my opinion. I think he will still view Frenchy as a better option than anyone in the system. I will agree that if he does somehow make a miraculous turnaround and put up truly good numbers, it will lead to more years and/or money. But I doubt he will be out of here after 2013 unless he's close to as bad as he was in 2012.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 11:28 AM
RE: Frenchy speaks
Gbwoy wrote:
desertclone wrote: Is anybody else fearful that Frenchy rebounds to something approaching his 2011 season causing Dayton to ink him to something like a 3 year, $21 million deal? I want him to have a decent season next year because you just can't keep throwing a black hole in RF every day, but Francoeur needs to be on his merry way out of KC next fall. I agree in general. I don't want him to suck horribly, because that loses us games.
But....what are we going to replace him with? I don't see many other options coming up the pipeline.
In short...I see him getting inked to a deal even if he's not one of the worst position players in baseball next year. Because while I might personally approve of something along the lines of Cain moving to RF and Dyson playing CF in 2014, I don't see any evidence that our GM shares my opinion. I think he will still view Frenchy as a better option than anyone in the system.
I will agree that if he does somehow make a miraculous turnaround and put up truly good numbers, it will lead to more years and/or money. But I doubt he will be out of here after 2013 unless he's close to as bad as he was in 2012. Agreed...... If he rebounds back to at or near his 2011 production level (119 OPS+/2.9 fWAR), then I think there's little doubt, that Moore will re-sign him. Only question is....how long & how much. If he comes closer to his 2012 production level (81 OPS+/-1.2 fWAR), then I don't see him returning. Haven't checked yet, to see who's going to be available RF wise in free agency next offseason.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 12:00 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
Royals1969 wrote:
Gbwoy wrote:
desertclone wrote: Is anybody else fearful that Frenchy rebounds to something approaching his 2011 season causing Dayton to ink him to something like a 3 year, $21 million deal? I want him to have a decent season next year because you just can't keep throwing a black hole in RF every day, but Francoeur needs to be on his merry way out of KC next fall. I agree in general. I don't want him to suck horribly, because that loses us games.
But....what are we going to replace him with? I don't see many other options coming up the pipeline.
In short...I see him getting inked to a deal even if he's not one of the worst position players in baseball next year. Because while I might personally approve of something along the lines of Cain moving to RF and Dyson playing CF in 2014, I don't see any evidence that our GM shares my opinion. I think he will still view Frenchy as a better option than anyone in the system.
I will agree that if he does somehow make a miraculous turnaround and put up truly good numbers, it will lead to more years and/or money. But I doubt he will be out of here after 2013 unless he's close to as bad as he was in 2012. Agreed......
If he rebounds back to at or near his 2011 production level (119 OPS+/2.9 fWAR), then I think there's little doubt, that Moore will re-sign him. Only question is....how long & how much.
If he comes closer to his 2012 production level (81 OPS+/-1.2 fWAR), then I don't see him returning.
Haven't checked yet, to see who's going to be available RF wise in free agency next offseason. Best available options will be Hunter Pence, Shin-Soo Choo, Nelson Cruz, and Corey Hart. Most of the rest are really old (Ichiro, Beltran, DeRosa, Rivera) or just not that good (DeJesus, Endy, Nady, Diaz, Frenchy). So, are there options out there? Yes. Are we going to pony up what is needed to get one of the top four guys? Unlikely. I assume Ellsbury, Carlos Gomez, Chris Young, etc. could move over if needed, but I don't know if you'd sign a guy specifically for that purpose or not.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 12:24 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
--------------------------------------------- --- Royals1969 wrote: Gbwoy wrote:
desertclone wrote: Is anybody else fearful that Frenchy rebounds to something approaching his 2011 season causing Dayton to ink him to something like a 3 year, $21 million deal? I want him to have a decent season next year because you just can't keep throwing a black hole in RF every day, but Francoeur needs to be on his merry way out of KC next fall. I agree in general. I don't want him to suck horribly, because that loses us games.
But....what are we going to replace him with? I don't see many other options coming up the pipeline.
In short...I see him getting inked to a deal even if he's not one of the worst position players in baseball next year. Because while I might personally approve of something along the lines of Cain moving to RF and Dyson playing CF in 2014, I don't see any evidence that our GM shares my opinion. I think he will still view Frenchy as a better option than anyone in the system.
I will agree that if he does somehow make a miraculous turnaround and put up truly good numbers, it will lead to more years and/or money. But I doubt he will be out of here after 2013 unless he's close to as bad as he was in 2012. Agreed...... If he rebounds back to at or near his 2011 production level (119 OPS+/2.9 fWAR), then I think there's little doubt, that Moore will re-sign him. Only question is....how long & how much. If he comes closer to his 2012 production level (81 OPS+/-1.2 fWAR), then I don't see him returning. Haven't checked yet, to see who's going to be available RF wise in free agency next offseason. --------------------------------------------- Carlos Beltran in 2014?
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- greewe
- Kansas City Royal
- 2444 posts this site
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 12:24 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
If Frenchy performs like he did in 2011, I'll take it every single day as we compete for the division and worry about what kind of dumb move DM might make later. Anyone who doesn't want Frenchy at that level is a strange kind of fan.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 12:42 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
Signing a guy with Frenchy's track record and skillset in his 30+ years, which is what you would get if he's extended, would be a gigantic blunder no matter how well he plays next year. I really don't think Moore is stupid enough to do that, but that might just be wishful thinking.
I think the best case scenario for this season is that Frenchy performs just well enough to not be a complete albatross and to be tradeable if we fall out of contention.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 12:48 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
In 2014, if nothing emerges as an internal option (which would be a surprise, I think), you're signing one year guys until hopefully Starling is ready and Cain slides to right.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- greewe
- Kansas City Royal
- 2444 posts this site
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 12:49 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
GregA wrote: Signing a guy with Frenchy's track record and skillset in his 30+ years, which is what you would get if he's extended, would be a gigantic blunder no matter how well he plays next year. I really don't think Moore is stupid enough to do that, but that might just be wishful thinking.
I think the best case scenario for this season is that Frenchy performs just well enough to not be a complete albatross and to be tradeable if we fall out of contention. Yes, extending him would be a blunder. I'm not arguing that. But to cheer for anything less than a fantastic season from Frenchy is weird. If this team performs like it could, a great season from Frenchy could be the difference maker in the division race.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 1:03 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
--------------------------------------------- --- dallasroyalsfan wrote:
In 2014, if nothing emerges as an internal option (which would be a surprise, I think), you're signing one year guys until hopefully Starling is ready and Cain slides to right.
---------------------------------------------
Who is going to emerge as an internal option in one years time? We have no one close who would be a decent bet to produce that I can think of. Maybe I'm forgetting someone though.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 1:09 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
greewe wrote: GregA wrote: Signing a guy with Frenchy's track record and skillset in his 30+ years, which is what you would get if he's extended, would be a gigantic blunder no matter how well he plays next year. I really don't think Moore is stupid enough to do that, but that might just be wishful thinking.
I think the best case scenario for this season is that Frenchy performs just well enough to not be a complete albatross and to be tradeable if we fall out of contention. Yes, extending him would be a blunder. I'm not arguing that. But to cheer for anything less than a fantastic season from Frenchy is weird. If this team performs like it could, a great season from Frenchy could be the difference maker in the division race. I agree with your point. However, we are a fanbase that has seen our GM make some really poor decisions. I think the belief is that Dayton has a soft spot for Frenchy and the only way that Moore will part ways with Frenchy is if he absolutely has no other choice.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 1:21 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
GregA wrote:
greewe wrote:
GregA wrote: Signing a guy with Frenchy's track record and skillset in his 30+ years, which is what you would get if he's extended, would be a gigantic blunder no matter how well he plays next year. I really don't think Moore is stupid enough to do that, but that might just be wishful thinking.
I think the best case scenario for this season is that Frenchy performs just well enough to not be a complete albatross and to be tradeable if we fall out of contention. Yes, extending him would be a blunder. I'm not arguing that. But to cheer for anything less than a fantastic season from Frenchy is weird. If this team performs like it could, a great season from Frenchy could be the difference maker in the division race. I agree with your point. However, we are a fanbase that has seen our GM make some really poor decisions. I think the belief is that Dayton has a soft spot for Frenchy and the only way that Moore will part ways with Frenchy is if he absolutely has no other choice. ...and the reason we have that belief is because he has held on to too many people who were not performing way too long because of soft spots. Just adding that because, Trey Hillman sucks.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 1:34 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
I wish reality would quit reminding me that my favorite team's general manager is bad at his job.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 1:40 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
I actually expect a good year from frenchy. Why? for the same reason he had a decent year 2 years ago. He has every reason to. If he doesnt his career is more or less over
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 1:44 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
This article is epic fail, as it does not mention the word "Yoga" once.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 2:10 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
KennyPowers wrote: This article is epic fail, as it does not mention the word "Yoga" once. The word "yoga" by itself is kind of a meh proposition. The degree of win/fail should be measured by the use of the word "yoga pants".
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2013 2:26 PM
RE: Frenchy speaks
This guy gets ripped from every direction, but I just can't hate the guy. I'm definitely pulling for him.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |