Posted: 11/29/2012 11:23 AM
Posted: 11/29/2012 11:28 AM
Last edited 11/29/2012 11:31 AM by rustyz
Posted: 11/29/2012 11:31 AM
Posted: 11/29/2012 11:33 AM
Posted: 11/29/2012 11:34 AM
Posted: 11/29/2012 11:35 AM
Posted: 11/29/2012 11:40 AM
Jayhawks23 wrote: Makes too much sense?? The guy was 41 - 50 before this year!!Just because he won this year means no success the rest of the time -- would MUCH rather trade for Shields or Lester who are YOUNGER!!
kerg01 wrote: Ventura and Monty probably get him....or maybe I'm pipe dreaming....No way I give up Myers for him....
Last edited 11/29/2012 11:46 AM by ElChupanibre
Posted: 11/29/2012 11:41 AM
Posted: 11/29/2012 11:43 AM
Posted: 11/29/2012 11:44 AM
Posted: 11/29/2012 11:45 AM
Posted: 11/29/2012 11:46 AM
trev1980 wrote: Shields > Lester > Dickey
DornCounty wrote: think about this folks.. if the mets want to flip the cy young winner on a cheap contract, what does that mean?
ElChupanibre wrote: kerg01 wrote: Ventura and Monty probably get him....or maybe I'm pipe dreaming....No way I give up Myers for him....It wouldn't take Myers, but it would be more than Ventura and Monty. He just won the Cy Young and is due only 5MM next year. Only having 1 year of control and his age and knuckleball weirdness lowers his value, but he's easily a cheap FOR pitcher for another year.Something like Cain + Odorizzi/Ventura + Adam/Calixte/Bonifacio might do it.
Posted: 11/29/2012 11:47 AM
Copyright © 2013
and Scout.com. All rights reserved. This website is an unofficial independent source of news and information, and is not affiliated with any school, team, or league.
MSN PrivacyLegalAdvertise on MSNAbout our adsRSS
© 2012 Microsoft|