Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 4  Next >

GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 PM

Posted: 6/12/2013 1:26 PM

GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 PM 


Reply | Quote

Posted: 6/12/2013 2:26 PM

RE: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 P 


we can't possibly get swept by this Padres team, can we? I think they have one position player who could make our 25 man roster, Headley.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 6/12/2013 2:27 PM

Re: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 


if the offense shows up we'll be ok...we'll know before we go through the lineup 2x if we are going to hit.

Refuse to accept the status quo-Wolfpack Unlimited

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 6/12/2013 2:55 PM

RE: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 P 



StPeteIrish wrote: we can't possibly get swept by this Padres team, can we? I think they have one position player who could make our 25 man roster, Headley.
You wouldn't take the big leagues' leader in steals? No interest in one of the leading ROY candidates? One of the top holds guys in the game?

I know (or hope, anyway) that you were being hyperbolic, but...
Reply | Quote

Posted: 6/12/2013 2:55 PM

RE: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 P 



StPeteIrish wrote: we can't possibly get swept by this Padres team, can we? I think they have one position player who could make our 25 man roster, Headley.
On paper yes, but if you look at how the players are performing on each team, it paints a much different picture.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 6/12/2013 3:24 PM

RE: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 P 



StPeteIrish wrote: we can't possibly get swept by this Padres team, can we? I think they have one position player who could make our 25 man roster, Headley.
Gyorko is light years better than Uggla and he's a rookie. The Pads aren't an awful team and were nothing special on the road.

#VoteFreddie

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:02 PM

RE: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 P 



StPeteIrish wrote: we can't possibly get swept by this Padres team, can we? I think they have one position player who could make our 25 man roster, Headley.

Not only can we....
Reply | Quote

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:02 PM

RE: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 P 


we should sell high on maholm while we can. i'm now on that boat. dude is all smoke and mirrors.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:03 PM

Re: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 


For a team with a winning record it's amazing how many games we start out losing
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:05 PM

RE: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 P 


Padres going for the rare 1st inning bat-around
Reply | Quote

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:05 PM

Re: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 


wow getting swept by the padres.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:06 PM

RE: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 P 


This is what happens when a guy who couldn't break a plate with a fastball sees his unsustainable peripherals crash to earth.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:07 PM

Re: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 


If someone had told me we would be swept by the Padres, I would not believe it. But I have had enough of this game already as a sweep looks more and more likely. No sense to waste three hours watching this disgrace. But if the higherups wants to get rid of a starting pitcher, I am onboard with Paul being the one to go when Beachy comes back.  

Bucksr.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:12 PM

Re: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 


Dan Uggla is plain out awful.

#VoteFreddie

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:12 PM

Re: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 


I really hope Uggla can be dealt in the offseason

  

Reply | Quote

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:13 PM

Re: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 


we're going to get shutout by a guy with a 6.33 era today. i feel it. 49k/33bb, we're going to get shutout by.

the approach of this offense is horrendous. why does our hitting coach never get blame/still have a job?
Reply | Quote
  • Nitts5
  • Braves Super Scout
  • 1572 posts this site
Avatar

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:14 PM

Re: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 




---------------------------------------------
--- tamahawkchop10 wrote:

Dan Uggla is plain out awful.

---------------------------------------------

Awful is putting it very, very kindly.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:15 PM

Re: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 


there is no attempt to do anything in a fundamental fashion for our offense. it's all just swing away at whatever you want. it is really really tough to watch.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:20 PM

Re: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 



SimmonsATL wrote: there is no attempt to do anything in a fundamental fashion for our offense. it's all just swing away at whatever you want. it is really really tough to watch.
You realize we're 2nd in the NL in walks right?
Reply | Quote

Posted: 6/12/2013 4:21 PM

Re: GDT: 6/12/13 Braves (P. Maholm) @ Padres (E. Volquez) 3:40 



tlroom112 wrote:
SimmonsATL wrote: there is no attempt to do anything in a fundamental fashion for our offense. it's all just swing away at whatever you want. it is really really tough to watch.
You realize we're 2nd in the NL in walks right?
and first in Ks. and horrible with RISP (and no, it's not all "bad luck" - not at all). we're terrible at hitting with two strikes. it's almost a guaranteed K.

Last edited 6/12/2013 4:27 PM by SimmonsATL

Reply | Quote
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 4  Next >