|
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
|
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 6:37 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
metdude wrote: As much as I like the show I almost wish I could unread the books to fully enjoy the experience. Knowing what's coming really does take away from the fun and appreciation. I do wonder how much I'd get if I wasn't armed with the prior knowledge though. Like that bit at the end last night. Did you non readers of the series get that those were all robert's bastards being slain? Because I'm not sure I picked that up from the show. I knew. But not from anything I felt I'd viewed last night other than the hint of Joffrey talking about them to his mother. And the barely audible mention of Gendry who Ned had peiced together as Robert's last season.
You definitely have to pay attention in both the book and the show. Yes, they set it up that whole episode, especially the scene you mention with Joffrey and Cersei. You really do need to pay attention, but you can almost always tell what is happening if you've been paying attention. Shows like the Wire really teach you HOW to watch these kinds of shows.
BEAN STRINGFELLOW FOR LIFE!!!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 7:20 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
dcmets wrote: I havent read the books either, but follow the show avidly. My biggest concern for the show is what Nutz mentioned - I just think viewers will want to see some pay off to the hated characters after too long. Again, I dont know the books, but I would hope HBO would just come out and say, we are doing only 4 season or something like that, so people knew when it would end. Even last night, you can tell that that the story could end up getting too broad. I'm fine with letting the books play out on-screen. However they'd like to take care of that, it will all be "new" to me - considering I've only read the 1st book. I'm not looking for any quick "pay-offs" - but that doesn't change the fact that I'd like to see Joffrey's head on a pike at some point. Kid just annoys the piss outta me. Also agree with BIMM - in that the "cast of thousands" actually adds to my enjoyment of the series. The way they've gone about the storyline hasn't gotten cluttered yet, which is impressive - and you hope it continues along this path. I've really been loving it so far, when the genre couldn't possibly be any further from what I typically like. I had watched the 1st season in doses; and it's times like these that make me wish I could just skip out on watching week-to-week - in favor of a few episodes at a clip. Hate to wait!
"Use your head.....that's that lump 3 feet above your arse." - Jimmy Dugan
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 7:36 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
Walnutz15 wrote:
dcmets wrote: I havent read the books either, but follow the show avidly. My biggest concern for the show is what Nutz mentioned - I just think viewers will want to see some pay off to the hated characters after too long. Again, I dont know the books, but I would hope HBO would just come out and say, we are doing only 4 season or something like that, so people knew when it would end. Even last night, you can tell that that the story could end up getting too broad. I'm fine with letting the books play out on-screen. However they'd like to take care of that, it will all be "new" to me - considering I've only read the 1st book.
I'm not looking for any quick "pay-offs" - but that doesn't change the fact that I'd like to see Joffrey's head on a pike at some point. Kid just annoys the piss outta me.
Also agree with BIMM - in that the "cast of thousands" actually adds to my enjoyment of the series. The way they've gone about the storyline hasn't gotten cluttered yet, which is impressive - and you hope it continues along this path.
I've really been loving it so far, when the genre couldn't possibly be any further from what I typically like. I had watched the 1st season in doses; and it's times like these that make me wish I could just skip out on watching week-to-week - in favor of a few episodes at a clip.
Hate to wait! Then you're in luck... The second episode has been leaked and is all over the web. I agree that the large cast has not gotten too daunting yet, but it's felt close at times. Lots of characters whose name i don't know, most of whom I don't think are important enough to bother learning. I'm not much into the fantasy genre, either. Lord of the Rings only did so much for me. But what I think makes this story so special is the fantasy part does not take the lead, at least not early on. It's introduced as a possibility, something that used to be. The only real difference we know between this world and the one we live in is the length of the seasons. But dragons, white-walkers, and whatever else seems to be gone for at least a couple of decades. So the fantasy aspect sort of takes a back seat while a political drama with complex characters, and beautiful landscapes, and well thought-out-storylines takes the focus. Trying to get my dad to watch, but he is just too put off by the fantasy stuff to begin with. I think he would like it, though.
BEAN STRINGFELLOW FOR LIFE!!!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 8:23 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
minkusdominkus wrote:
metdude wrote: As much as I like the show I almost wish I could unread the books to fully enjoy the experience. Knowing what's coming really does take away from the fun and appreciation. I do wonder how much I'd get if I wasn't armed with the prior knowledge though. Like that bit at the end last night. Did you non readers of the series get that those were all robert's bastards being slain? Because I'm not sure I picked that up from the show. I knew. But not from anything I felt I'd viewed last night other than the hint of Joffrey talking about them to his mother. And the barely audible mention of Gendry who Ned had peiced together as Robert's last season.
You definitely have to pay attention in both the book and the show. Yes, they set it up that whole episode, especially the scene you mention with Joffrey and Cersei. You really do need to pay attention, but you can almost always tell what is happening if you've been paying attention.
Shows like the Wire really teach you HOW to watch these kinds of shows. Agreed...as a non-reader, I thought it was pretty clear that those were all his sons and that they would lead it up to the blacksmith guy...
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 8:24 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
minkusdominkus wrote:
metdude wrote: As much as I like the show I almost wish I could unread the books to fully enjoy the experience. Knowing what's coming really does take away from the fun and appreciation. I do wonder how much I'd get if I wasn't armed with the prior knowledge though. Like that bit at the end last night. Did you non readers of the series get that those were all robert's bastards being slain? Because I'm not sure I picked that up from the show. I knew. But not from anything I felt I'd viewed last night other than the hint of Joffrey talking about them to his mother. And the barely audible mention of Gendry who Ned had peiced together as Robert's last season.
You definitely have to pay attention in both the book and the show. Yes, they set it up that whole episode, especially the scene you mention with Joffrey and Cersei. You really do need to pay attention, but you can almost always tell what is happening if you've been paying attention.
Was a pretty great close-out to the episode.....not all that comforting to watch with a pregnant wife by your side, but - we pretty much expect the unexpected when it comes to watching the show by now. We both knew what was happening there, and neither of us have read the books (again, only Book 1 for me). I was actually wondering when Arya (or is it Arry?) would make "his" appearance. Interesting to see that she's latching on with Gendry - after he saved her from those dopey bullies at the end of Season 1. Figured it would happen, but I just have inklings that I know where it might go with them......quite interesting indeed. Show's got both, me and my wife hooked.
"Use your head.....that's that lump 3 feet above your arse." - Jimmy Dugan
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 8:47 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
Walnutz15 wrote:
minkusdominkus wrote:
metdude wrote: As much as I like the show I almost wish I could unread the books to fully enjoy the experience. Knowing what's coming really does take away from the fun and appreciation. I do wonder how much I'd get if I wasn't armed with the prior knowledge though. Like that bit at the end last night. Did you non readers of the series get that those were all robert's bastards being slain? Because I'm not sure I picked that up from the show. I knew. But not from anything I felt I'd viewed last night other than the hint of Joffrey talking about them to his mother. And the barely audible mention of Gendry who Ned had peiced together as Robert's last season.
You definitely have to pay attention in both the book and the show. Yes, they set it up that whole episode, especially the scene you mention with Joffrey and Cersei. You really do need to pay attention, but you can almost always tell what is happening if you've been paying attention.
Was a pretty great close-out to the episode.....not all that comforting to watch with a pregnant wife by your side, but - we pretty much expect the unexpected when it comes to watching the show by now.
We both knew what was happening there, and neither of us have read the books (again, only Book 1 for me).
I was actually wondering when Arya (or is it Arry?) would make "his" appearance. Interesting to see that she's latching on with Gendry - after he saved her from those dopey bullies at the end of Season 1. Figured it would happen, but I just have inklings that I know where it might go with them......quite interesting indeed.
Show's got both, me and my wife hooked. As far as keeping up with what was going on, for the first few episodes I read some on-line recaps to make sure I followed everything, but once I got my arms around it, that was no longer necessary (though I still do like to read them). And I did get the whole bit with Robert's bastards. And speaking of Arya, just another great thing about this show, I can't recall another show I've ever watched with a more impressive lot of child actors, specifically Arya and Joffrey.
Eagles/Indiana/Mets/Villanova: it's a long story
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 8:53 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
PhilaMet wrote:
Walnutz15 wrote:
minkusdominkus wrote:
metdude wrote: As much as I like the show I almost wish I could unread the books to fully enjoy the experience. Knowing what's coming really does take away from the fun and appreciation. I do wonder how much I'd get if I wasn't armed with the prior knowledge though. Like that bit at the end last night. Did you non readers of the series get that those were all robert's bastards being slain? Because I'm not sure I picked that up from the show. I knew. But not from anything I felt I'd viewed last night other than the hint of Joffrey talking about them to his mother. And the barely audible mention of Gendry who Ned had peiced together as Robert's last season.
You definitely have to pay attention in both the book and the show. Yes, they set it up that whole episode, especially the scene you mention with Joffrey and Cersei. You really do need to pay attention, but you can almost always tell what is happening if you've been paying attention.
Was a pretty great close-out to the episode.....not all that comforting to watch with a pregnant wife by your side, but - we pretty much expect the unexpected when it comes to watching the show by now.
We both knew what was happening there, and neither of us have read the books (again, only Book 1 for me).
I was actually wondering when Arya (or is it Arry?) would make "his" appearance. Interesting to see that she's latching on with Gendry - after he saved her from those dopey bullies at the end of Season 1. Figured it would happen, but I just have inklings that I know where it might go with them......quite interesting indeed.
Show's got both, me and my wife hooked. As far as keeping up with what was going on, for the first few episodes I read some on-line recaps to make sure I followed everything, but once I got my arms around it, that was no longer necessary (though I still do like to read them). And I did get the whole bit with Robert's bastards.
And speaking of Arya, just another great thing about this show, I can't recall another show I've ever watched with a more impressive lot of child actors, specifically Arya and Joffrey. Shameless...
BEAN STRINGFELLOW FOR LIFE!!!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 9:23 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
Regarding the intro discussed earlier in the thread, if i remember correctly, last season the intro credits always showed the core places (Winterfell, Wall, King's L, etc.), but tweaked it by adding a few locations involved in whatever episode was currently playing - i.e., the Aerie, Riverrun, etc. They did the same sunday, with teh addition of Dragonstone, and I imagine they'll show the Iron Islands once Theon returns home.
Regarding Dragonstone, yes, that is where Stannis resides, and no it hasn't been mentioned yet, only alluded to (with Stannis) by Renly and others during the first season. Dragonstone is not so large as to constitute a "kingdom" or "realm" so to speak, rather they are Stannis' holdings as a Lord, brother, and bannerman to the former king.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 10:03 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
Walnutz15 wrote: dcmets wrote: I havent read the books either, but follow the show avidly. My biggest concern for the show is what Nutz mentioned - I just think viewers will want to see some pay off to the hated characters after too long. Again, I dont know the books, but I would hope HBO would just come out and say, we are doing only 4 season or something like that, so people knew when it would end. Even last night, you can tell that that the story could end up getting too broad. I'm fine with letting the books play out on-screen. However they'd like to take care of that, it will all be "new" to me - considering I've only read the 1st book.
I'm not looking for any quick "pay-offs" - but that doesn't change the fact that I'd like to see Joffrey's head on a pike at some point. Kid just annoys the piss outta me.
Also agree with BIMM - in that the "cast of thousands" actually adds to my enjoyment of the series. The way they've gone about the storyline hasn't gotten cluttered yet, which is impressive - and you hope it continues along this path.
I've really been loving it so far, when the genre couldn't possibly be any further from what I typically like. I had watched the 1st season in doses; and it's times like these that make me wish I could just skip out on watching week-to-week - in favor of a few episodes at a clip.
Hate to wait! Yeah, I would continue to watch. Was just starting the discussion. I would hate to see the show pulled prematurely. It's gotta be incredibly expensive to make. HBO does have a lot more leeway, but they do stop shows when the numbers arent there.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 10:06 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
minkusdominkus wrote:
PhilaMet wrote: As far as keeping up with what was going on, for the first few episodes I read some on-line recaps to make sure I followed everything, but once I got my arms around it, that was no longer necessary (though I still do like to read them). And I did get the whole bit with Robert's bastards.
And speaking of Arya, just another great thing about this show, I can't recall another show I've ever watched with a more impressive lot of child actors, specifically Arya and Joffrey. Shameless... huh?
Eagles/Indiana/Mets/Villanova: it's a long story
Last edited 4/3/2012 10:07 AM by PhilaMet
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 10:06 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
dcmets wrote:
Walnutz15 wrote:
dcmets wrote: I havent read the books either, but follow the show avidly. My biggest concern for the show is what Nutz mentioned - I just think viewers will want to see some pay off to the hated characters after too long. Again, I dont know the books, but I would hope HBO would just come out and say, we are doing only 4 season or something like that, so people knew when it would end. Even last night, you can tell that that the story could end up getting too broad. I'm fine with letting the books play out on-screen. However they'd like to take care of that, it will all be "new" to me - considering I've only read the 1st book.
I'm not looking for any quick "pay-offs" - but that doesn't change the fact that I'd like to see Joffrey's head on a pike at some point. Kid just annoys the piss outta me.
Also agree with BIMM - in that the "cast of thousands" actually adds to my enjoyment of the series. The way they've gone about the storyline hasn't gotten cluttered yet, which is impressive - and you hope it continues along this path.
I've really been loving it so far, when the genre couldn't possibly be any further from what I typically like. I had watched the 1st season in doses; and it's times like these that make me wish I could just skip out on watching week-to-week - in favor of a few episodes at a clip.
Hate to wait! Yeah, I would continue to watch. Was just starting the discussion. I would hate to see the show pulled prematurely. It's gotta be incredibly expensive to make. HBO does have a lot more leeway, but they do stop shows when the numbers arent there. You said it.
HBO had to stop "ROME" because of costs.
............something tells me they were saving up for "Game of Thrones"! ---- or at least right now, I'm hoping that's what the plan was. 
They'll definitely need to put a ton of money in the show to give the audience what they want. From the time those dragon eggs were introduced in Season 1, I started envisioning massive Dragon scenes!
That's gonna be bonkers; and would really be somethin' else to see from an HBO production.
"Use your head.....that's that lump 3 feet above your arse." - Jimmy Dugan
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 10:10 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
Walnutz15 wrote:
dcmets wrote:
Walnutz15 wrote:
dcmets wrote: I havent read the books either, but follow the show avidly. My biggest concern for the show is what Nutz mentioned - I just think viewers will want to see some pay off to the hated characters after too long. Again, I dont know the books, but I would hope HBO would just come out and say, we are doing only 4 season or something like that, so people knew when it would end. Even last night, you can tell that that the story could end up getting too broad. I'm fine with letting the books play out on-screen. However they'd like to take care of that, it will all be "new" to me - considering I've only read the 1st book.
I'm not looking for any quick "pay-offs" - but that doesn't change the fact that I'd like to see Joffrey's head on a pike at some point. Kid just annoys the piss outta me.
Also agree with BIMM - in that the "cast of thousands" actually adds to my enjoyment of the series. The way they've gone about the storyline hasn't gotten cluttered yet, which is impressive - and you hope it continues along this path.
I've really been loving it so far, when the genre couldn't possibly be any further from what I typically like. I had watched the 1st season in doses; and it's times like these that make me wish I could just skip out on watching week-to-week - in favor of a few episodes at a clip.
Hate to wait! Yeah, I would continue to watch. Was just starting the discussion. I would hate to see the show pulled prematurely. It's gotta be incredibly expensive to make. HBO does have a lot more leeway, but they do stop shows when the numbers arent there. You said it.
HBO had to stop "ROME" because of costs.
............something tells me they were saving up for "Game of Thrones"! ---- or at least right now, I'm hoping that's what the plan was. 
They'll definitely need to put a ton of money in the show to give the audience what they want. From the time those dragon eggs were introduced in Season 1, I started envisioning massive Dragon scenes!
That's gonna be bonkers; and would really be somethin' else to see from an HBO production. Yes, I too worry about it meeting the same fate as "Rome". Not only did they cancel it, but they pretty much ruined the second and final season by trying to cram so much in, which is a shame because it also was a great show. Game of Thrones seems to generating a ton of buzz though, so hopefully they're getting more viewership to justify the costs (which have to be extremely high).
Eagles/Indiana/Mets/Villanova: it's a long story
Last edited 4/3/2012 10:23 AM by PhilaMet
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 10:16 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
interesting article on the rising costs for season 2. it cost $60 million for season 1 and about 15% more for season 2 (minor spoiler in article...just want to give warning for anyone who doesn't want to know anything that may be happening) http://online.wsj.com/article/...2008018946.html
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 10:17 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
PhilaMet wrote:
minkusdominkus wrote:
PhilaMet wrote: As far as keeping up with what was going on, for the first few episodes I read some on-line recaps to make sure I followed everything, but once I got my arms around it, that was no longer necessary (though I still do like to read them). And I did get the whole bit with Robert's bastards.
And speaking of Arya, just another great thing about this show, I can't recall another show I've ever watched with a more impressive lot of child actors, specifically Arya and Joffrey. Shameless... huh? Sorry, should have been more clear. The kid actors on Shameless (on Showtime) are every bit as impressive, if not moreso, than the kids in GoT.
BEAN STRINGFELLOW FOR LIFE!!!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 10:22 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
minkusdominkus wrote:
PhilaMet wrote:
minkusdominkus wrote:
PhilaMet wrote: As far as keeping up with what was going on, for the first few episodes I read some on-line recaps to make sure I followed everything, but once I got my arms around it, that was no longer necessary (though I still do like to read them). And I did get the whole bit with Robert's bastards.
And speaking of Arya, just another great thing about this show, I can't recall another show I've ever watched with a more impressive lot of child actors, specifically Arya and Joffrey. Shameless... huh? Sorry, should have been more clear. The kid actors on Shameless (on Showtime) are every bit as impressive, if not moreso, than the kids in GoT. Ah...got it 
Eagles/Indiana/Mets/Villanova: it's a long story
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 10:27 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
PhilaMet wrote:
Walnutz15 wrote:
dcmets wrote:
Walnutz15 wrote:
dcmets wrote: I havent read the books either, but follow the show avidly. My biggest concern for the show is what Nutz mentioned - I just think viewers will want to see some pay off to the hated characters after too long. Again, I dont know the books, but I would hope HBO would just come out and say, we are doing only 4 season or something like that, so people knew when it would end. Even last night, you can tell that that the story could end up getting too broad. I'm fine with letting the books play out on-screen. However they'd like to take care of that, it will all be "new" to me - considering I've only read the 1st book.
I'm not looking for any quick "pay-offs" - but that doesn't change the fact that I'd like to see Joffrey's head on a pike at some point. Kid just annoys the piss outta me.
Also agree with BIMM - in that the "cast of thousands" actually adds to my enjoyment of the series. The way they've gone about the storyline hasn't gotten cluttered yet, which is impressive - and you hope it continues along this path.
I've really been loving it so far, when the genre couldn't possibly be any further from what I typically like. I had watched the 1st season in doses; and it's times like these that make me wish I could just skip out on watching week-to-week - in favor of a few episodes at a clip.
Hate to wait! Yeah, I would continue to watch. Was just starting the discussion. I would hate to see the show pulled prematurely. It's gotta be incredibly expensive to make. HBO does have a lot more leeway, but they do stop shows when the numbers arent there. You said it.
HBO had to stop "ROME" because of costs.
............something tells me they were saving up for "Game of Thrones"! ---- or at least right now, I'm hoping that's what the plan was. 
They'll definitely need to put a ton of money in the show to give the audience what they want. From the time those dragon eggs were introduced in Season 1, I started envisioning massive Dragon scenes!
That's gonna be bonkers; and would really be somethin' else to see from an HBO production. Yes, I too worry about it meeting the same fate as "Rome". Not only did they cancel it, but they pretty much ruined the second and final season by trying to cram so much in, which is a shame because it also was a great show. Game of Thrones seems to generating a ton of buzz though, so hopefully they're getting more viewership to justify the costs (which have to be extremely high). I would not worry about this show going the way of "Rome." The hype for this show is much much larger than it ever was for Rome, plus Game of Thrones is winning Emmys and stuff. HBO wants people talking about their shows to generate more interest and more subs, and that's exactly what they have here. This show is a huge hit for them, regardless of the weekly ratings... Slate did a really nice article on how HBO makes money from a show like this... Found it, here's an excerpt... But there are still more factors at play. Since the premium cable networks produce just three or four episodes of original television each week, they need to attract positive attention. Popular “buzz,” a uselessly fuzzy concept for channels that make money from ad sales, is important to HBO and Showtime because it generates subscriptions—the more a show like Game of Thrones dominates the cultural conversation, the more people will sign up for HBO to watch it. Ideally, every show will receive a) critical praise, b) a huge audience, and c) a shelf full of statuettes. But in a pinch, just one of those things will suffice. The Wire drew a minuscule audience (peaking at 4 million but down under 1 millionin its final episodes) and was ignored at the award shows, but thanks to critical acclaim, HBO gave the show five glorious seasons to spool out its complex drama.
Link
BEAN STRINGFELLOW FOR LIFE!!!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 10:35 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
hobson54 wrote: interesting article on the rising costs for season 2. it cost $60 million for season 1 and about 15% more for season 2
(minor spoiler in article...just want to give warning for anyone who doesn't want to know anything that may be happening)
http://online.wsj.com/article/...2008018946.html Thanks for the interesting read. 
"Use your head.....that's that lump 3 feet above your arse." - Jimmy Dugan
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/3/2012 1:57 PM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
minkusdominkus wrote:
PhilaMet wrote:
minkusdominkus wrote:
PhilaMet wrote: As far as keeping up with what was going on, for the first few episodes I read some on-line recaps to make sure I followed everything, but once I got my arms around it, that was no longer necessary (though I still do like to read them). And I did get the whole bit with Robert's bastards.
And speaking of Arya, just another great thing about this show, I can't recall another show I've ever watched with a more impressive lot of child actors, specifically Arya and Joffrey. Shameless... huh? Sorry, should have been more clear. The kid actors on Shameless (on Showtime) are every bit as impressive, if not moreso, than the kids in GoT. They certainly are... The acting on Shameless overall is just unreal....
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/5/2012 4:28 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
Good to hear everyone is following the plot despite it's complexity and subtleties. Heard many people who weren't sure what was going on at the end so I just wondered if it's being alluded to enough. You guys might be an especially attentive bunch.
As someone who read the books I got to admit I don't hang on every word in the show. Foreknowledge of events does tend to make my attention wander from some details and focus on how good the show looks and jump ahead in my mind. I really wish I could unknow what I know and enjoy the twists and turns the story takes.
But I figure future seasons may have to deviate. And Martin is writing so slowly it could be years before I get a refresher with a new book. So a lot of things will be forgotten by then. And I don't plan on rereading again anytime soon especially in light of the show and my desire to enjoy it as much as possible.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 4/5/2012 7:39 AM
RE: Game of Thrones Starts Tonight
metdude wrote: Good to hear everyone is following the plot despite it's complexity and subtleties. Heard many people who weren't sure what was going on at the end so I just wondered if it's being alluded to enough. You guys might be an especially attentive bunch.
For me, it had a "Slaughter of the Innocents" biblical feel to it.
"Use your head.....that's that lump 3 feet above your arse." - Jimmy Dugan
|
|
Reply |
Quote |