Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 7  Next >

From the combine...fyi

Posted: 2/22/2013 9:09 AM

From the combine...fyi 


Travis Frederick, 6'4", 312 pounds, 33 arm length, projected round 2.

Ricky Wagner, 6'6", 308 pounds, 34 arm length, projected 5-6 round.
Reply | Quote
  • pkshanov
  • Freshman
  • 1556 posts this site

Posted: 2/22/2013 9:20 AM

RE: From the combine...fyi 


Wait, I thought they were supposed to be college football's best C and LT duo?

Best of luck to them both in the draft and future careers.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 9:26 AM

RE: From the combine...fyi 


In late August, CFN had wagner as its number one OT and TF as its number one interior OL. Kiper and others had him highly rated as well.

I think wagners alleged poor sr bowl practices and TF's move from OC to OG in the NFL likely dropped them a bit. Still, an OG who goes in high 2nd round is a top 2-3 OG coming in.

hard to figure whey wagner dropped though he had some trouble vs some good DEs. (big ten had arguably the best bookends in the nation in simon and gholston)
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 9:27 AM

Re: From the combine...fyi 



badgerpaw wrote: Travis Frederick, 6'4", 312 pounds, 33 arm length, projected round 2.

Ricky Wagner, 6'6", 308 pounds, 34 arm length, projected 5-6 round.
Seems about right to me. Frederick might just slip into the 1st round if someone is focused on a versatile lineman that can play Center.  Wagner, 1st round all-everything, nah. He was good but not great. I think he's got the athletic ability though to get significantly better in time. Somebody could get lucky with this pick.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 9:34 AM

RE: From the combine...fyi 



buckyfever1 wrote: In late August, CFN had wagner as its number one OT and TF as its number one interior OL. Kiper and others had him highly rated as well.

I think wagners alleged poor sr bowl practices and TF's move from OC to OG in the NFL likely dropped them a bit. Still, an OG who goes in high 2nd round is a top 2-3 OG coming in.

hard to figure whey wagner dropped though he had some trouble vs some good DEs. (big ten had arguably the best bookends in the nation in simon and gholston)
Wagner's less than stellar senior season didn't help him much either.  He never really made much of a jump from his SOPHOMORE season.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 10:20 AM

RE: From the combine...fyi 



buckyfever1 wrote:

hard to figure whey wagner dropped though he had some trouble vs some good DEs. (big ten had arguably the best bookends in the nation in simon and gholston)
phhhhbt. any guesses as to how many SEC DEs get drafted before either of those guys? And that's among draftable players only, Clowney at SC is better than all of them.

And to answer my own question, I'm going to guess five.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 10:20 AM

Re: From the combine...fyi 



UnknownBadger wrote:
badgerpaw wrote: Travis Frederick, 6'4", 312 pounds, 33 arm length, projected round 2.

Ricky Wagner, 6'6", 308 pounds, 34 arm length, projected 5-6 round.
Seems about right to me. Frederick might just slip into the 1st round if someone is focused on a versatile lineman that can play Center.  Wagner, 1st round all-everything, nah. He was good but not great. I think he's got the athletic ability though to get significantly better in time. Somebody could get lucky with this pick.


A second-round Center is very, very good draft position. A low first-round Guard would also be very good.



Wagner down that low is a little surprising. I don't see him as a 1-2 round OT, but 3-4 is legit. 5-6? That's low.

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 10:33 AM

RE: From the combine...fyi 



buckyfever1 wrote: In late August, CFN had wagner as its number one OT and TF as its number one interior OL. Kiper and others had him highly rated as well.

I think wagners alleged poor sr bowl practices and TF's move from OC to OG in the NFL likely dropped them a bit. Still, an OG who goes in high 2nd round is a top 2-3 OG coming in.

hard to figure whey wagner dropped though he had some trouble vs some good DEs. (big ten had arguably the best bookends in the nation in simon and gholston)
it just goes to show people don't really watch OL play as closely as they tihnk they do and make blanket statements based on one series they watched or one bad play.
When Montee BAll is continuoulsy running for 7-8-20 yards at a pop, nobody is watching the O'lineman but when a play is stopped for no gain, 'It's did you see Mtthias get pushed back there? DId you see HAvenstein knocked back?
Frankly, it's often a popularity contest and Badger fans just love a whipping boy, especially on the O'line..
Wagner wasn't great all season, fortunately, CAirmi played agianst all the good DE"s in the league and they all left for the NFL 2 years ago. LOL
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 11:53 AM

RE: From the combine...fyi 


Clowney is a league of his own but as a tandem, Simon and Gholston were RIDICULOUS.

one could argue simon kept osu from losses to UW in both 2011/12(And then there were the zebras in 12,bangheadbangheadbanghead)

I dont know how simon projects but imo, he was the best player we saw last year in terms of a one man wrecking crew.

people can take shots at RH all they want for his 2012 vs this duo but Simon destroyed josh oglesby and JO was first team COACHES all big ten in 2011
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 11:54 AM

RE: From the combine...fyi 


Still #58 would be a value pick in the 5th.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 12:42 PM

RE: From the combine...fyi 



buckyfever1 wrote: Clowney is a league of his own but as a tandem, Simon and Gholston were RIDICULOUS.
They aren't on the same team, so I don't know what you mean by tandem. In 2011 Gholston did nothing and then he beat Havenstein like a rented mule this year. Not that impressive.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/22/2013 12:46 PM

Re: From the combine...fyi 


Travis Frederick will be a much better guard than a center at the next level.
Avatar
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 12:49 PM

Re: From the combine...fyi 



Wispak wrote: Travis Frederick will be a much better guard than a center at the next level.
I think so too, wispak, but it will not surprise me if he sees time at both during his time as a pro.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 2:44 PM

Re: From the combine...fyi 


Wagner has some tools but I never saw it translate to the level of play justifying how highly some had him rated.  I always wondered what I was missing.

"It's a great day to be great!"  Greg Jennings 2/6/11

SNC - D3 Men's Hockey National Champs

WWCND?  What Would Chuck Norris Do?

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 3:19 PM

Re: From the combine...fyi 



mwingb wrote:

Wagner has some tools but I never saw it translate to the level of play justifying how highly some had him rated.  I always wondered what I was missing.

Nothing, he did a decent job at RT, and a couple people here combined that performance with his agility and determined that he was now the next great Wisconsin LT. Since then they have refused to admit that they just may have gotten carried away with their pie-in-the sky prediction.

Not surprisingly the same one's do it over and over and then come up with all sorts of excuses and "if only's"  why things went wrong.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 4:13 PM

Re: From the combine...fyi 


When 3 top draft analysts have RW as the #1-2 LT in fall 2012, I guess a few badger fans who..................

1. Watch no film
2. never played the game
3. Snipe vs ADD ANY PROACTIVE ANALYSIS

yea, they knew better than 3 guys who do this 24/7 and talk to scouts/GM"S all weekrolleyesrolleyes

RW was at worst a top 15-20 pick in August and then, had an averge sr year/sr bowl

he will play alot longer in the league than GC will imo
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 4:18 PM

Re: From the combine...fyi 


Agree with this and 5cent. Don't see wags lasting until round 5. 
Bacchus1 wrote:
UnknownBadger wrote:
badgerpaw wrote: Travis Frederick, 6'4", 312 pounds, 33 arm length, projected round 2.

Ricky Wagner, 6'6", 308 pounds, 34 arm length, projected 5-6 round.
Seems about right to me. Frederick might just slip into the 1st round if someone is focused on a versatile lineman that can play Center.  Wagner, 1st round all-everything, nah. He was good but not great. I think he's got the athletic ability though to get significantly better in time. Somebody could get lucky with this pick.


A second-round Center is very, very good draft position. A low first-round Guard would also be very good.



Wagner down that low is a little surprising. I don't see him as a 1-2 round OT, but 3-4 is legit. 5-6? That's low.

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 4:56 PM

Re: From the combine...fyi 


Bench reps

Frederick  21
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/travis-frederi ck?id=2540161
Wagner    20
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/ricky-wagner?i d=2539340

Last edited 2/22/2013 4:57 PM by NewerBreed

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 5:56 PM

Re: From the combine...fyi 



NewerBreed wrote: Bench reps

Frederick  21
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/travis-frederi ck?id=2540161
Wagner    20
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/ricky-wagner?i d=2539340
Not great but acceptable.

They both lost weight since the season ended, i always see worse bench results by kids who train to be quicker and lighter for the combine.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 6:18 PM

Re: From the combine...fyi 


Barely acceptable-need to show some quicks.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 6:43 PM

Re: From the combine...fyi 



ajmadison wrote:
NewerBreed wrote: Bench reps

Frederick  21
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/travis-frederi ck?id=2540161
Wagner    20
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/ricky-wagner?i d=2539340
Not great but acceptable.

They both lost weight since the season ended, i always see worse bench results by kids who train to be quicker and lighter for the combine.
Re: Weight loss.  How do you know they both lost weight.  You can't believe the numbers posted on the official roster.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/22/2013 7:06 PM

Re: From the combine...fyi 


They look slimmer too.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/23/2013 8:41 AM

Re: From the combine...fyi 


Frederick's numbers surprise me.  I expected much more - maybe around 30 reps.

I expected more from Wagner as well, but not as many more reps as I did from Frederick.
A strange situation,
A wild occupation,
Living my life,
Like a song....

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/23/2013 8:52 AM

Re: From the combine...fyi 


Frederick  40 Yard dash  5.50

Armstead from Arkansas Pine Bluff is really putting up freaky metrics.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/23/2013 8:54 AM

Re: From the combine...fyi 



UnknownBadger wrote:
mwingb wrote:

Wagner has some tools but I never saw it translate to the level of play justifying how highly some had him rated.  I always wondered what I was missing.

Nothing, he did a decent job at RT, and a couple people here combined that performance with his agility and determined that he was now the next great Wisconsin LT. Since then they have refused to admit that they just may have gotten carried away with their pie-in-the sky prediction.

Not surprisingly the same one's do it over and over and then come up with all sorts of excuses and "if only's"  why things went wrong.
What a bunch of unadulterated BS. If a "couple of posters here" determined he was the next great Wisconsin LT it's only because Bret Bielema was leading that bandwagon.

When asked about Wagner being discussed as a potential first round draft pick Bret told the media that he expected Ricky to make a huge jump his second year removed from moving from RT to LT. Posters didn't pull that out of thin air. That was the conventional wisdom coming out of the football offices at the time. 

http://host.madison.com/sports/college/video/biele ma-discusses-wagner-and-borland/vmix_53545c36-d77e -11e1-9627-001a4bcf887a.html

Bret telling the media during the 2012 season that Wagner falls somewhere between Joe Thomas and Gabe Carimi talent wise.

http://host.madison.com/sports/college/video/biele ma-rick-wagner-s-best-football-is-ahead-of-him/vmi x_60133f20-2867-11e2-b765-0019bb2963f4.html

Last edited 2/23/2013 9:00 AM by madbadger

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/23/2013 8:56 AM

Re: From the combine...fyi 


Frederick's testing so far is similar to Moffitt's in 2011.

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2011/profiles/john-moffit t?id=2495204
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/23/2013 9:06 AM

Re: From the combine...fyi 


Of the B1G O-linemen, the guy that stands out so far appears to be Fragel from tOSU. He put up 33 reps in the BP and has an unofficial 5.09 40yd at 6-8 308.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/23/2013 9:07 AM

Re: From the combine...fyi 



badgerman27 wrote: Frederick's numbers surprise me.  I expected much more - maybe around 30 reps.

I expected more from Wagner as well, but not as many more reps as I did from Frederick.
It doesn't surprise me. Herbert didn't focus on guys throwing weights around during his time in Madison. His focus was building functional strength through non traditional exercises. During his time in Madison our O-linemen never put up gaudy BP numbers at the combine.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/23/2013 9:12 AM

Re: From the combine...fyi 


Zeitler and Watt (D-line) did.

Last edited 2/23/2013 9:13 AM by NewerBreed

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/23/2013 9:30 AM

Re: From the combine...fyi 



madbadger wrote:
UnknownBadger wrote:
mwingb wrote:

Wagner has some tools but I never saw it translate to the level of play justifying how highly some had him rated.  I always wondered what I was missing.

Nothing, he did a decent job at RT, and a couple people here combined that performance with his agility and determined that he was now the next great Wisconsin LT. Since then they have refused to admit that they just may have gotten carried away with their pie-in-the sky prediction.

Not surprisingly the same one's do it over and over and then come up with all sorts of excuses and "if only's"  why things went wrong.
What a bunch of unadulterated BS. If a "couple of posters here" determined he was the next great Wisconsin LT it's only because Bret Bielema was leading that bandwagon.

When asked about Wagner being discussed as a potential first round draft pick Bret told the media that he expected Ricky to make a huge jump his second year removed from moving from RT to LT. Posters didn't pull that out of thin air. That was the conventional wisdom coming out of the football offices at the time. 

http://host.madison.com/sports/college/video/biele ma-discusses-wagner-and-borland/vmix_53545c36-d77e -11e1-9627-001a4bcf887a.html

Bret telling the media during the 2012 season that Wagner falls somewhere between Joe Thomas and Gabe Carimi talent wise.

http://host.madison.com/sports/college/video/biele ma-rick-wagner-s-best-football-is-ahead-of-him/vmi x_60133f20-2867-11e2-b765-0019bb2963f4.html
I agree 100%! You never could trust what Bielema was telling the media. He was kinda like a few here in that those he praised were going to be all everything. Wagner was and has a lot of potential but it's not realized yet. Unfortunately it seems you and others didn't learn that until way too late. Gilreath, Doe, Garner, are others. There are more.

BTW, I actually do think that Gilreath's productivity was hampered by injury AND Special Teams that were poorly coached for much of his career. BB didn't do him justice.

Last edited 2/23/2013 9:41 AM by UnknownBadger

Reply | Quote
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 7  Next >