Koobs wrote: Thank you gentle men for your succinct replies. The carrying out of "Social Justice" would require the imposition of a police state, always monitoring the value of properties to make sure that equitable distribution remained current and did not get out of kilter . The laws of descent and distribution would have to be repealed so that the mass holding of an estate would lapse to the Sovereign.upon death and not go to sons and daughters. So, "Social Justice" is financial equality enforced by the State. Peacefully if it can, forceably if it must. Never mind that the Constitution says that the people shall be secure in their persons and property. Oh well, that's just an abstraction anyway. Who are those adhering to and advocating Social Justice ?
1/16/2012 @ (:00 P.M. I became interested in this subject and did a bit of research on the net.
"Social Justice" has now entered the cirriculum in thousands of public schools from K-1 to graduation. The thinking of proponants is , oddly enough, to inject it into science courses, so that it can be digested more easily
and need not be presented as a separate stand-alone course. Clever devils, aren't they ? And yes, its root tenet is redistribution of wealth (income) . Why beat your brains out going to college ? Why run up those education loans? Just relax , and let "Social Justice" bring income equity to you ?
Another reason we have to get rid of government schools.
