I agree we missed some open looks in the second half -

but the ball movement was a lot less crisp -

and so Ole Miss was not falling all over the place.  This translates into our getting more rebounds, having Ole Miss out of position, and more open passing lanes which then makes the ball movement easier still.

In the second half, for the last ten minutes as they pressed - and we stood around, the d had a hand in our face, the clock was trickling down - and we almost never could go "inside-out" to find the open man.  Instead, we largely went "piddle around the outside" - which is easier to defend.  We may have found an open man eventually - but it was not smooth . The first half we really had some outstanding ball movement.  It is something very positive we can take from the game.  But again - with the game on the line, we did kind of gag until we actually lost the lead.  Then we played inspired ball again to the three second mark.  Henderson's shot was a prayer - but we should not have let him get the ball and we should have contested the inbounds & then OT never even happens...