Posted: 2/22/2011 7:09 PM
Posted: 2/22/2011 9:06 PM
Posted: 2/23/2011 12:51 AM
Posted: 2/23/2011 8:48 AM
And if you cut benefits you should expect resistance your workforce. News @ 11.
Posted: 2/23/2011 11:05 AM
Posted: 2/23/2011 3:17 PM
Posted: 2/23/2011 3:54 PM
Posted: 2/23/2011 6:01 PM
Mynok wrote: How are taxpayers burdened with union dues? Makes zero sense, as the workers themselves pay the dues.
Posted: 2/24/2011 1:58 AM
Posted: 2/24/2011 5:57 AM
Posted: 2/24/2011 9:07 AM
Posted: 2/24/2011 9:47 AM
Posted: 2/24/2011 10:42 AM
anthair wrote: Which part of "government employee" do you not understand ? Nothing "private" about it...
Posted: 2/24/2011 10:50 AM
Posted: 2/24/2011 11:28 AM
anthair wrote: ZeroThe same way that when a public employee buys groceries, everyone who pays taxes can eat at their table free of charge. If they buy a house, then we all own a brick. When someone works for the government we get to control 100% of what they do with their money, because it is our money and that is the very definition of freedom. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXActually a little worse than that, son...Government workers are actually able to elect their own boss....pretty good deal if you can get it....I assume you think it's OK for taxpayers to pay salaries and benefits to union thugs that are higher than the average taxpayer's salary and benefits...Probaly OK with you Libs but it smells like two week old fish to the taxpayers supplying that salary to the union thugs...
Posted: 2/24/2011 12:09 PM
Posted: 2/24/2011 12:41 PM
anthair wrote: If they were "private" the employees would have a choice about whetherr to join...that's not the case...how long would a government employee keep their job if they refused to join ? Unions are the money launderring arm of the Democrat Party...they extort money from the taxpayers who pay government workers salaries and take the extorted payments and give it to Democrats...legalized extortion...
Posted: 2/24/2011 12:52 PM
anthair wrote: txxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxActually a conservative value would be allowing a prospective worker to choose whether or not to join a union...a conservative value would be having some say so in the political contributions made by a worker's union...a conservative value would be not allowing an organization that produces nothing to extort taxpayers...what your statement fails to mention is that there would be no paycheck to do with as they please if they were not blackmailed into joining a union...with current laws in place there is absolutely no reason for a union other than to enrich mobsters and Libs at the expense of taxpayers...As to salaries, Federal spending on education has risen 188% in REAL dollars since 1970 with no improvement in students' test scores...(actually I believe SAT scores topped out around 1962)....the unpleasant truth is that people who cannot get a degree in any other field major in education...in general teachers are the bottom of the barrel scholastically...and I know that is not always true, but is very common...if they want to make more money they should seek degrees in law, accounting, physics, etc...
Last edited 2/24/2011 2:09 PM by theZero
Posted: 2/24/2011 2:48 PM
Posted: 2/24/2011 3:29 PM
anthair wrote: MynokI didn't say they were a government entity...
anthair wrote: MynokWhich part of "government employee" do you not understand ? Nothing "private" about it...
Copyright © 2013
and Scout.com. All rights reserved. This website is an unofficial independent source of news and information, and is not affiliated with any school, team, or league.
MSN PrivacyLegalAdvertise on MSNAbout our adsRSS
© 2012 Microsoft|