Search SiteSearch Options
Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)

Re: The "Stanford Indian" debate
Avatar

Posted: 01/16/2008 2:23 PM

Re: The "Stanford Indian" debate 


shihsl wrote: Are we all sure it wouldn't be worth resurrecting the fight for Robber Barons? Honestly, I'd think that anyone offended by it would be dead by now, right?
How could you be so insentitive? "Robbers Barons" is offensive to rich, old, white, corrupt, rapacious businessmen everywhere. They have feelings too!


Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 01/16/2008 2:48 PM

Re: The "Stanford Indian" debate 

I honestly cannot tell if you're being sarcastic or serious....
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 01/16/2008 4:47 PM

Re: The "Stanford Indian" debate 

I think the picture is a clue ...

Steve Durrett

The pessimist dies a thousand deaths, the optimist dies but once
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 01/16/2008 5:12 PM

Re: The "Stanford Indian" debate 

Hehe... what's wrong with being an intimidating, obese man with a sword ?
Reply | Quote