|
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (9-5) 12/23 SNF vs 49ers
|
|
|
Posted: 12/24/2012 9:01 AM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (9-5) 12/23 SNF vs 49ers
flair1 wrote:
cannonballjunior wrote:
SlimGoody73 wrote:
cannonballjunior wrote:
NCStateEngineer wrote: Man I love seeing our block S during pro games
I missed that. They showed our block S while talking about RW? Cool. I liked the way that Al Michaels explained the situation. Said RW was awesome at NCSU, set the record for most passes without a int at NCSU, yadda yadda, and that RW then tried minor league baseball. He still had a year of eligibility when baseball was over so he went to Whisky for his final and memorable season.
I will also say Collingsworth didn't do all of his homework. He's praising RW for the read option they're running and said he had never done that before. Well, he didn't check out his NCSU film I'm guessing...
Sounds like Michaels did a good and fair job with that.
Did Wilson run any read option in college? For some reason I'm not remembering that. Russell did some read option out of the shotgun at State. Well then Collingsworth is a dunce!
Last edited 12/24/2012 9:01 AM by cannonballjunior
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/24/2012 9:08 AM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Seattle looks like a legit Super Bowl team right now. They are on fire.
I've seen enough flaws out of the rest of the NFC's best to believe that the Seahawks have as good a shot as anybody right now.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/24/2012 9:16 AM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (9-5) 12/23 SNF vs 49ers
wolfer79 wrote:
wolfbreath wrote:
Packand8fan wrote: Russell is the man! Figured he would get both teams in. What a class act and a great player! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv3w_LHC64A I have heard better audio with 2 paper cups and a string. No good deed goes unpunished. 
You gravitate to that which you secretly love most. You meet in life the exact reproduction of your own thoughts |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2012 11:31 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Seahawks have a running joke where they bust on Wilson for wearing Joseph a bank suits rather than custom-made ones. Pretty funny
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2012 11:35 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
criticalproblems wrote: Seahawks have a running joke where they bust on Wilson for wearing Joseph a bank suits rather than custom-made ones. Pretty funny Wait till RW signs his first big contract. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2012 12:01 AM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2012 3:13 PM
Re: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
I just saw where RW's uniform from Week 15 is in the NFL Hall of Fame. He became the first player ever to rush for 3 TDs and throw for 1TD in the first half of a game.
"I'm watching North Carolina playing North Carolina State and there were five million red shirts in the crowd. And if I’d had a BB gun, five million red shirts would have had a burned rear end." - Roy Williams, 11/28/2011
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- KChill
- Blames the crowd
- 6073 posts this site
|
Posted: 12/29/2012 10:50 AM
Re: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
SiriusPack wrote:
I just saw where RW's uniform from Week 15 is in the NFL Hall of Fame. He became the first player ever to rush for 3 TDs and throw for 1TD in the first half of a game. Yup looks like RW beat PR to the Hall of Fame ;) http://www.profootballhof.com/...l-hall-of-fame/ |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2012 11:43 AM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (9-5) 12/23 SNF vs 49ers
wolfbreath wrote:
SoonerWolf wrote: He needs 2 more TD passes to tie Peyton Manning for most TD throws in a season by a rookie. He should break that record next Sunday. Update: he needs 2 TD passes to break Peyton Manning's rookie passing TD record. Rams come to Seattle. I hope they let Russell throw it every trip to the endzone.
"Here... we see what may be the epitome of a warrior, cunning matched with instinct and stealth, joined with a final, terrifying attack. For this mighty creature, I name you. You are Clan Wolf."
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2012 11:50 AM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Gopack80 wrote: Seattle looks like a legit Super Bowl team right now. They are on fire.
I've seen enough flaws out of the rest of the NFC's best to believe that the Seahawks have as good a shot as anybody right now. Ehhhh they just aren't the same team on the road. Most likely they'll have to go to Atlanta in the 2nd round, and they are 0-3 in dome games this year, all on the road. I'd have a hard time seeing them win back to back to back games on the road to make a SB. With that being said they can still nab the #3 and even #2 seed with a little fortune. Would be something if they got the #2 seed over GB because of that head to head game.
Last edited 12/29/2012 11:51 AM by SidsSouljahBoy
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2012 12:47 PM
Re: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Not related to Russell Wilson directly, but Richard Sherman won his PED appeal. Similar to the way that Braun won his appeal against MLB. SO, that means that Browner will be available next week (if necessary) to play along side Sherman.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 10:07 AM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
DeCock: O'Brien's QB experiment yields varied resultsThe only sour note in his post-N.C. State career came last weekend, when he was forced to nail down his college choice for NBC’s introductions. His declaration, “from a whole Pack of Badgers,” offended, and satisfied, no one. While I agree with the article in general, I disagree with this. I was delighted.
"Here... we see what may be the epitome of a warrior, cunning matched with instinct and stealth, joined with a final, terrifying attack. For this mighty creature, I name you. You are Clan Wolf."
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 10:31 AM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
SoonerWolf wrote: DeCock: O'Brien's QB experiment yields varied results
The only sour note in his post-N.C. State career came last weekend, when he was forced to nail down his college choice for NBC’s introductions. His declaration, “from a whole Pack of Badgers,” offended, and satisfied, no one. While I agree with the article in general, I disagree with this. I was delighted. +1 |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 10:36 AM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
SidsSouljahBoy wrote:
Gopack80 wrote: Seattle looks like a legit Super Bowl team right now. They are on fire.
I've seen enough flaws out of the rest of the NFC's best to believe that the Seahawks have as good a shot as anybody right now. Ehhhh they just aren't the same team on the road. Most likely they'll have to go to Atlanta in the 2nd round, and they are 0-3 in dome games this year, all on the road. I'd have a hard time seeing them win back to back to back games on the road to make a SB.
With that being said they can still nab the #3 and even #2 seed with a little fortune. Would be something if they got the #2 seed over GB because of that head to head game. They have won 3 road games this year. They have won there last 2 road games. People keep throwing out that "bad on the road line" without seeing that it has changed. They were bad on the road early on when they had the training wheels on Russell. Since they took them off they have been a different team. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 11:18 AM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
HywayWolf wrote:
SidsSouljahBoy wrote:
Gopack80 wrote: Seattle looks like a legit Super Bowl team right now. They are on fire.
I've seen enough flaws out of the rest of the NFC's best to believe that the Seahawks have as good a shot as anybody right now. Ehhhh they just aren't the same team on the road. Most likely they'll have to go to Atlanta in the 2nd round, and they are 0-3 in dome games this year, all on the road. I'd have a hard time seeing them win back to back to back games on the road to make a SB.
With that being said they can still nab the #3 and even #2 seed with a little fortune. Would be something if they got the #2 seed over GB because of that head to head game. They have won 3 road games this year. They have won there last 2 road games. People keep throwing out that "bad on the road line" without seeing that it has changed. They were bad on the road early on when they had the training wheels on Russell. Since they took them off they have been a different team. Winning 2 road games in a row doesn't change the bigger picture of an entire season of road games. I'm not impressed by beating the Bills on the road. Winning in Chicago is nice but lets be honest, that's a reeling Bears team playing awful football right now. It really has nothing to do with taking the training wheels off they were already a solid team regardless. 5 of their first 8 games were on the road this year and they went 1-4, they've gone 2-1 on the road since for a 3-5 record. This team isn't the same without the 12th man in their back pocket everyone know that. It's not saying they are a bad football team, but they are very beatable away from home. 0-3 on the road in dome games doesn't look good either. They'd like to avoid teams like Dallas and Atlanta if that trend holds true. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 12:44 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
SidsSouljahBoy wrote:
HywayWolf wrote:
SidsSouljahBoy wrote:
Gopack80 wrote: Seattle looks like a legit Super Bowl team right now. They are on fire.
I've seen enough flaws out of the rest of the NFC's best to believe that the Seahawks have as good a shot as anybody right now. Ehhhh they just aren't the same team on the road. Most likely they'll have to go to Atlanta in the 2nd round, and they are 0-3 in dome games this year, all on the road. I'd have a hard time seeing them win back to back to back games on the road to make a SB.
With that being said they can still nab the #3 and even #2 seed with a little fortune. Would be something if they got the #2 seed over GB because of that head to head game. They have won 3 road games this year. They have won there last 2 road games. People keep throwing out that "bad on the road line" without seeing that it has changed. They were bad on the road early on when they had the training wheels on Russell. Since they took them off they have been a different team. Winning 2 road games in a row doesn't change the bigger picture of an entire season of road games. I'm not impressed by beating the Bills on the road. Winning in Chicago is nice but lets be honest, that's a reeling Bears team playing awful football right now. It really has nothing to do with taking the training wheels off they were already a solid team regardless. 5 of their first 8 games were on the road this year and they went 1-4, they've gone 2-1 on the road since for a 3-5 record. This team isn't the same without the 12th man in their back pocket everyone know that. It's not saying they are a bad football team, but they are very beatable away from home. 0-3 on the road in dome games doesn't look good either. They'd like to avoid teams like Dallas and Atlanta if that trend holds true. I'm just saying they aren't the same team now as they were before they took the training wheels off Russell. People shouldn't say they can't win on the road like they could say in the first half of the season. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 12:50 PM
Re: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Is this better? The odds of them winning on the road are way lower than the odds of them winning at home. If they don't get the 3 seed or better today their upside in the playoffs IMO is 1 road playoff win at best and then they are done. Lets not forget the playoffs are a different animal. Expecting rookies to come in and be successful right off the bat is a tall order.
Dan Marino, Bernie Kosar, Jim Everett, Todd Marinovich, Shaun King, Ben Roethlisberger, Joe Flacco, Matt Ryan, Mark Sanchez and Andy Dalton are the only rookie quarterbacks since the NFL-AFL merger to take their teams to the playoffs. Their combined playoff record is 6-10, with a total of 15 touchdown passes and 26 interceptions and an average of 16 points a game. None of the rookies reached the Super Bowl, though four (King, Roethlisberger, Flacco and Sanchez) got their teams as far as the conference championship game. The other five rookie signal-callers all lost in the opening round. Take a look at the 4 rookies that did make a deep run into the playoffs and you'll notice all of those QB's had very strong defenses so Wilson does have that working in his favor, but the playoffs overall have not been kind to first year signal callers.
Last edited 12/30/2012 12:57 PM by SidsSouljahBoy
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 12:55 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Have you looked at who the Bears lost to - all playoff teams, if The Vikings make it. And except for SF, within one score. --------------------------------------------- --- SidsSouljahBoy wrote: HywayWolf wrote:
SidsSouljahBoy wrote:
Gopack80 wrote: Seattle looks like a legit Super Bowl team right now. They are on fire.
I've seen enough flaws out of the rest of the NFC's best to believe that the Seahawks have as good a shot as anybody right now. Ehhhh they just aren't the same team on the road. Most likely they'll have to go to Atlanta in the 2nd round, and they are 0-3 in dome games this year, all on the road. I'd have a hard time seeing them win back to back to back games on the road to make a SB.
With that being said they can still nab the #3 and even #2 seed with a little fortune. Would be something if they got the #2 seed over GB because of that head to head game. They have won 3 road games this year. They have won there last 2 road games. People keep throwing out that "bad on the road line" without seeing that it has changed. They were bad on the road early on when they had the training wheels on Russell. Since they took them off they have been a different team. Winning 2 road games in a row doesn't change the bigger picture of an entire season of road games. I'm not impressed by beating the Bills on the road. Winning in Chicago is nice but lets be honest, that's a reeling Bears team playing awful football right now. It really has nothing to do with taking the training wheels off they were already a solid team regardless. 5 of their first 8 games were on the road this year and they went 1-4, they've gone 2-1 on the road since for a 3-5 record. This team isn't the same without the 12th man in their back pocket everyone know that. It's not saying they are a bad football team, but they are very beatable away from home. 0-3 on the road in dome games doesn't look good either. They'd like to avoid teams like Dallas and Atlanta if that trend holds true. --------------------------------------------- Deo vindice majores aemulamur |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 1:00 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Prowler wrote:
Have you looked at who the Bears lost to - all playoff teams, if The Vikings make it. And except for SF, within one score.
---------------------------------------------
--- SidsSouljahBoy wrote:
HywayWolf wrote:
SidsSouljahBoy wrote:
Gopack80 wrote: Seattle looks like a legit Super Bowl team right now. They are on fire.
I've seen enough flaws out of the rest of the NFC's best to believe that the Seahawks have as good a shot as anybody right now. Ehhhh they just aren't the same team on the road. Most likely they'll have to go to Atlanta in the 2nd round, and they are 0-3 in dome games this year, all on the road. I'd have a hard time seeing them win back to back to back games on the road to make a SB.
With that being said they can still nab the #3 and even #2 seed with a little fortune. Would be something if they got the #2 seed over GB because of that head to head game. They have won 3 road games this year. They have won there last 2 road games. People keep throwing out that "bad on the road line" without seeing that it has changed. They were bad on the road early on when they had the training wheels on Russell. Since they took them off they have been a different team. Winning 2 road games in a row doesn't change the bigger picture of an entire season of road games. I'm not impressed by beating the Bills on the road. Winning in Chicago is nice but lets be honest, that's a reeling Bears team playing awful football right now. It really has nothing to do with taking the training wheels off they were already a solid team regardless. 5 of their first 8 games were on the road this year and they went 1-4, they've gone 2-1 on the road since for a 3-5 record. This team isn't the same without the 12th man in their back pocket everyone know that. It's not saying they are a bad football team, but they are very beatable away from home. 0-3 on the road in dome games doesn't look good either. They'd like to avoid teams like Dallas and Atlanta if that trend holds true.
--------------------------------------------- And the Bears have beat no one so what exactly is your point? Their offense with Mike Tice is complete crap and their OL is utter garbage. Their defense was playing way over their expected value the first half of the season out scoring their own offense, and that kind of pace which was impossible to keep up eventually evened out and what you get is the blah football team the Bears are heading into the last week of the season. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 1:01 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Most teams do better at home than on the road. However, the Seahawks have the NFL's best defense (IMO) and an offense that defenses can't figure out right now. They are also peaking at the perfect time. They will likely play the role of spoiler this year but it wouldn't surprise me if they did make it to the Super Bowl.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Glen Quagmire: Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time.
Last edited 12/30/2012 1:02 PM by wolfpack05
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 1:02 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
wolfpack05 wrote: Most teams do better at home than on the road. However, the Seahawks have the NFL's best defense (IMO) and an offense that defenses can't figure out right now. They are also peaking at the perfect time. They are going to play spoiler against some very good teams but it wouldn't surprise me if they did make it to the Super Bowl. They can still get the 2 or 3 seed, that wouldn't be playing the role of spoiler at that point, it would flip the script and it'd turn into expectations of winning with a home game. And I hope you guys don't think I'm dogging the Seahawks I'm not. I liked them before Russ came along. I'm a fan of Carroll's happy go lucky attitude and Marshawn Lynch has been one of my favorite RB's in the league since he was a Buffalo Bill.
Last edited 12/30/2012 1:05 PM by SidsSouljahBoy
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 1:04 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
criticalproblems wrote: youtu.be/N9C_F6XNpiw?t=7m30s That's pretty good. Russ should do an ad campaign. "Buy ONE RW autograph, get THREE free!"
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 1:24 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
SidsSouljahBoy wrote:
wolfpack05 wrote: Most teams do better at home than on the road. However, the Seahawks have the NFL's best defense (IMO) and an offense that defenses can't figure out right now. They are also peaking at the perfect time. They are going to play spoiler against some very good teams but it wouldn't surprise me if they did make it to the Super Bowl. They can still get the 2 or 3 seed, that wouldn't be playing the role of spoiler at that point, it would flip the script and it'd turn into expectations of winning with a home game. And I hope you guys don't think I'm dogging the Seahawks I'm not. I liked them before Russ came along. I'm a fan of Carroll's happy go lucky attitude and Marshawn Lynch has been one of my favorite RB's in the league since he was a Buffalo Bill. I am in no way making a prediction that they will make it to the super bowl. My only point was that the axiom that the Hawks can't win on the road is no longer accurate. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 5:48 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
No TDs in the 1st half.
Halftime: Seattle 3 -- Rams 7
You gravitate to that which you secretly love most. You meet in life the exact reproduction of your own thoughts |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:13 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Ah, firstrow has this. Better than nothing.
Hauschka made a field goal to make it Seattle 6, Rams 7.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:26 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
I tried firstrow to watch this. So much adware... and pretty sophisticated adware at that. It was smart enough to trigger my "this is a bad idea" and revert to a restore point on my laptop... |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:28 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
BoxwoodWolf wrote: I tried firstrow to watch this. So much adware... and pretty sophisticated adware at that. It was smart enough to trigger my "this is a bad idea" and revert to a restore point on my laptop... I do not download anything and use adblock/noscript with a non-superuser windows account.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:28 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
BoxwoodWolf wrote: I tried firstrow to watch this. So much adware... and pretty sophisticated adware at that. It was smart enough to trigger my "this is a bad idea" and revert to a restore point on my laptop... porn and a fried hard drive has been known to happen
football record prediction (2010) 3-9, 1-7 (2011) 5-7, 2-6 (2012) 7-5, 4-4
MBB prediction: (2010-11) 21-9, 10-6 (2011-12) 19-12, 7-9 (2012-13) 24-7, 12-6
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:35 PM
Re: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
LOL, wouldn't know anything about that!  Sure Pal! |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:36 PM
Re: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Last update, Rams 13 Seahawks 6. Wilson 8-10 122 yds. about midway 3rd qtr.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:39 PM
Re: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
goturbackpack66 wrote: Last update, Rams 13 Seahawks 6. Wilson 8-10 122 yds. about midway 3rd qtr. 10 Rams, Seahawks 6
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:40 PM
Re: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
caddyshackpack wrote:
goturbackpack66 wrote: Last update, Rams 13 Seahawks 6. Wilson 8-10 122 yds. about midway 3rd qtr.
10 Rams, Seahawks 6 now 13-10 Seahawks on Wilson TD Pass
football record prediction (2010) 3-9, 1-7 (2011) 5-7, 2-6 (2012) 7-5, 4-4
MBB prediction: (2010-11) 21-9, 10-6 (2011-12) 19-12, 7-9 (2012-13) 24-7, 12-6
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:40 PM
Re: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
TD pass by Wilson. He ties Manning's record.
Seahawks 13 - Rams 10
You gravitate to that which you secretly love most. You meet in life the exact reproduction of your own thoughts |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:41 PM
Re: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
my bad, sorry, Seattle just scored a TD!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:42 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Russell gets 26 TDs to tie the rookie TD record. I hope he breaks it. WolfBadger!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:42 PM
Re: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Way to go RW!!!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:43 PM
Re: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Don't think that one went 10 yards
You gravitate to that which you secretly love most. You meet in life the exact reproduction of your own thoughts |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:44 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
I don't agree with even attempting that trick play at this point in the game.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 6:57 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
Up 3 in the 3rd quarter and right after a TD, Seattle tries a trick onsides kick and fails. St. Louis drives and ties it up with a field goal. 13 all.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2012 7:00 PM
RE: Russell Wilson Thread (10-5) 12/30 vs Rams
caddyshackpack wrote: I don't agree with even attempting that trick play at this point in the game. Pete Carroll being Pete Carroll
football record prediction (2010) 3-9, 1-7 (2011) 5-7, 2-6 (2012) 7-5, 4-4
MBB prediction: (2010-11) 21-9, 10-6 (2011-12) 19-12, 7-9 (2012-13) 24-7, 12-6
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
