Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (8 fans in chatroom)
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
< Prev.  Page of 6  Next >

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT

Avatar

Posted: 2/3/2013 2:36 PM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



VegasWolf wrote:
wolfer79 wrote:
VegasWolf wrote:
wolfpack87 wrote: It should never leave Greensboro. But that's just me I suppose.
It isn't just you.  This is where it belongs.
since the link says both MSG and the Brooklyn Nets facility declined to bid and the ACC has gone back to them, the university representatives seem to disagree.
Doesn't mean I have agree with them.  But then again, I'm a golf course superintendent and not a universtity rep.  What do I know?
vote with your wallet. it will get their attention

and the every popular EMAIL YOW!!!

football record prediction (2010) 3-9, 1-7 (2011) 5-7, 2-6 (2012) 7-5, 4-4
MBB prediction: (2010-11) 21-9, 10-6 (2011-12) 19-12, 7-9 (2012-13) 24-7, 12-6


Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/3/2013 2:39 PM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



wolfpackernc wrote: Great idea unless you are still upset about the War of Northern Aggression.

Maybe we can pillage and burn their city, and take full and mighty advantage of their less mouthy wimmenz.

______________________________________________________________________________
Hot women, good bourbon and a good grill is all a man needs.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/3/2013 3:33 PM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 


Keep it in Greensboro. Always has the most support there.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/3/2013 4:16 PM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



cwsloan wrote: How do we as State fans lobby for Greensboro without looking like "homers?"  I dont know how to answer that because I am a North Carolinian and a State grad....

But IMO, every tournament I see on TV not in Greensboro sucks!   I know even in G'Boro the Thursday and early Friday games have gotten sparse, but even the Saturday games, the BEST day of the tourney,  in Tampa and Atlanta, looked dead and no one outside of FSU or Miami hardly wanted to travel.

Is Greensboro a geographical advantage to Duke, UNC, NCSU, and Wake?  Maybe a little.  But I promise the teams who deserve to win, win.  Just ask Florida State!

I was there in Washington DC when we finally appeased Gary Williams to have a tournament there and to watch him go out in the FIRST ROUND!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tradition = Greensboro

4 schools in NC and nearby school in Clemson = Greensboro

It keeps the tournament relevant and it gets the best fan base who knows how to distribute tickets and travel...

You would think Swofford would want Greensboro considering how much it benefits UNC and Duke!
Don't forget Va Tech 90 min up the road in Blacksburg. Closer than Clemson.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/3/2013 4:25 PM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



RedLight wrote: I think most of those adamantly oppossed have never visited NYC. It would be a great location and fun trip. Much more interesting than Greensboro. Ideally have it there once every 4-5 years.

DC is also a fun trip. Plus, you can stay in NOVA much cheaper and ride the metro into the city.

The biggest challenge facing the Tournamnet is how to handle expansion. Next year there will be 15 schools involved. I think on-campus play-in games for the lower seeds should be looked at to keep the event manageable.
I am adamantly opposed to NYC and I have been there many, many times. Aside from being
ridiculously expensive it simply is not a College sports town. I would vote for Greensboro permanently. If I never go back to NYC it would be too soon
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/3/2013 4:28 PM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



wolfer79 wrote:
VegasWolf wrote:
wolfpack87 wrote: It should never leave Greensboro. But that's just me I suppose.
It isn't just you.  This is where it belongs.
since the link says both MSG and the Brooklyn Nets facility declined to bid and the ACC has gone back to them, the university representatives seem to disagree.
Or maybe it's just Swofford who is interested.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/3/2013 4:33 PM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



Wufman66 wrote:
wolfer79 wrote:
VegasWolf wrote:
wolfpack87 wrote: It should never leave Greensboro. But that's just me I suppose.
It isn't just you.  This is where it belongs.
since the link says both MSG and the Brooklyn Nets facility declined to bid and the ACC has gone back to them, the university representatives seem to disagree.
Or maybe it's just Swofford who is interested.
If a significant chunk of the university representatives were against it, Swofford wouldn't be going for it. Swofford has to answer to the member institutions. It's not as if he runs the conference without the approval of its members, as so many who like to blame all the failures on Swoff would like to believe.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/3/2013 4:36 PM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 


Makes sense. More current or soon to be ACC clubs came from the Big East than the Southern Conference which is whence the Big Four, Clem and UVA came. Just rename the league The Big East and Alantic Coast Conference and be done with it.

Dave Robertson was "the greatest southpaw (pitcher) the game ever knew" - John J. McGraw, The Milwaukee Sentinel, May 21, 1916

Reply | Quote
  • 0newolf
  • Well Spoken
  • 1800 posts this site
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 8:46 AM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



wolfpackernc wrote: Great idea unless you are still upset about the War of Northern Aggression.
Just because we've never waged war against Canada doesn't mean it's off the table.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 9:33 AM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 


We've invaded Canada twice.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 9:56 AM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



0newolf wrote:
wolfpackernc wrote: Great idea unless you are still upset about the War of Northern Aggression.
Just because we've never waged war against Canada doesn't mean it's off the table.
Not only did we invade Canada twice (actually it's 3 times, though you don't typically hear about it) as WakeIndy pointed out, we also lost miserably.

I don't know how you see it, but when it comes to the children, Wu-Tang is for the children.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 10:27 AM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



WakeForestIndy wrote: We've invaded Canada twice.
Third time's the charm.

"I would rather wake up in the middle of nowhere than in any city on earth." — Steve McQueen

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/4/2013 10:39 AM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 


We will just have to wait and see what Notre Dame wants.  When they announce they want it held in South Bend, Swoff will move it there and then get back down on his knees for them.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 10:55 AM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



Otter74 wrote: With Maryland gone, take DC off the list.  I say do a 3 city rotation.  Atlanta, Greensboro, NY, Greensboro, Atlanta, etc.

I think MD leaving is the reason DC should be put back on the list
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 10:58 AM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 


ACC 2016-21 tourney finalists: ATL (Philips), Charlotte, Greensboro, NY, Tampa & D.C

 
"Logic, my dear Zoe, merely enables one to be wrong with authority." 
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/4/2013 11:03 AM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



Wufman66 wrote:
cwsloan wrote: How do we as State fans lobby for Greensboro without looking like "homers?"  I dont know how to answer that because I am a North Carolinian and a State grad....

But IMO, every tournament I see on TV not in Greensboro sucks!   I know even in G'Boro the Thursday and early Friday games have gotten sparse, but even the Saturday games, the BEST day of the tourney,  in Tampa and Atlanta, looked dead and no one outside of FSU or Miami hardly wanted to travel.

Is Greensboro a geographical advantage to Duke, UNC, NCSU, and Wake?  Maybe a little.  But I promise the teams who deserve to win, win.  Just ask Florida State!

I was there in Washington DC when we finally appeased Gary Williams to have a tournament there and to watch him go out in the FIRST ROUND!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tradition = Greensboro

4 schools in NC and nearby school in Clemson = Greensboro

It keeps the tournament relevant and it gets the best fan base who knows how to distribute tickets and travel...

You would think Swofford would want Greensboro considering how much it benefits UNC and Duke!
Don't forget Va Tech 90 min up the road in Blacksburg. Closer than Clemson.
If I am the other 11 schools, I nix the Greensboro all the time arrangement. The Greensboro Coiliseum has a lot of seats, but the facility isn't that good and all it ends up being is a Crapolina fest. This isn't the ACC with 7 or 8 schools.

I would like to see it rotate every year and I don't care how many seats you sell, because now it just ends up being filled by the crappies in the early rounds. Why should they get home games in the early rounds?

I say Greensboro, Charlotte, Atlanta, Orlando, Washington, Metro New York should rotate the tournament and I hope the other 11 will make this happen. Just like everything else, why sit back and have terms dictated to you? What advantage do they get to constantly play on Crapolina's home court? And it certainly isn't State's home court, if that is what some of you think.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 11:05 AM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



wolfer79 wrote: Because of the Atlantic Coast Conference's increased footprint in the Northeast, the ACC is interested in holding a future men's basketball tournament in New York, an ACC school official told ESPN.

Besides New York, other cities being considered to host the 2016-21 ACC tournaments are Atlanta (Philips Arena), Charlotte, Greensboro, N.C., Tampa, Fla., and Washington D.C.

Four cities -- Miami, Orlando, Pittsburgh and Atlanta (Georgia Dome), who all submitted a bid to host a tournament between 2016-21 -- have been eliminated from contention to host. Despite the Georgia Dome hosting the two highest-attended conference tournaments (the 2001 and '09 ACC tournaments), it was eliminated because of the ACC's preference to place future tournaments in more traditional basketball arenas instead of domes.
Is it too difficult to just have the basketball and football championships in Charlotte?
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/4/2013 11:09 AM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 


I like Orlando better than Tampa. Isn't the Orlando Arena just as nice as Tampa's. Might not be next to the water, but it is at Disneyland, which is a good tourist destination and it is a good fit for the southern tier being more centrally located for Miami, FSU, GT, and Clemson.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 11:10 AM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 


My opinion does not matter, but from that list:

No - Atl, Charlotte, Tampa, DC
Yes, Greensboro
Maybe (at least once) - NYC
dunlow66 wrote:

ACC 2016-21 tourney finalists: ATL (Philips), Charlotte, Greensboro, NY, Tampa & D.C

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/4/2013 11:13 AM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 


Scamway Arena in Orlando seats 20,000 (NCAA basketball)

Tampa Bay Times Forum seats 20,500
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 11:27 AM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 




---------------------------------------------
--- 48wolfpacker wrote:


Wufman66 wrote:
wolfer79 wrote:
VegasWolf wrote:
wolfpack87 wrote: It should never leave Greensboro. But that's just me I suppose.
It isn't just you.  This is where it belongs.
since the link says both MSG and the Brooklyn Nets facility declined to bid and the ACC has gone back to them, the university representatives seem to disagree.
Or maybe it's just Swofford who is interested.
If a significant chunk of the university representatives were against it, Swofford wouldn't be going for it. Swofford has to answer to the member institutions. It's not as if he runs the conference without the approval of its members, as so many who like to blame all the failures on Swoff would like to believe.

---------------------------------------------

That's part of his job and why he makes his high salary. As long as the uninformed continually place blame at his feet and not their university president, he's doing his job well.

ONS, I'm sure you are looking forward to your Big 12 holding it's basketball tourney in Charleston, WV or Pittsburgh down the road to accommodate the Mountaineers. For the SEC fans on the board, a tourney will likely be held in Houston and Kansas City before too long. Big Ten holding conference events in Pittsburgh, DC and NYC? Going to happen. That's part of the deal with conference expansion.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/4/2013 11:38 AM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 


^
The Big 12 is a football league except for Kansas and even the Jayhawks don't care about the conference tournament. The official conference champ is the regular season champ. The ACC is known for basketball. At least it was at one time.

Dave Robertson was "the greatest southpaw (pitcher) the game ever knew" - John J. McGraw, The Milwaukee Sentinel, May 21, 1916

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 11:42 AM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



PretzelPack wrote: I like Orlando better than Tampa. Isn't the Orlando Arena just as nice as Tampa's. Might not be next to the water, but it is at Disneyland, which is a good tourist destination and it is a good fit for the southern tier being more centrally located for Miami, FSU, GT, and Clemson.
Orlando isn't any closer to Clemson than DC. The "good fit" advantage (of any FL location) only applies for the two FL schools (Atlanta would probably the best compromise). I'm fine with any new location as long as people show up.

I don't know how you see it, but when it comes to the children, Wu-Tang is for the children.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 11:55 AM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 




---------------------------------------------
--- OldNorthStatesman wrote:

^
The Big 12 is a football league except for Kansas and even the Jayhawks don't care about the conference tournament. The official conference champ is the regular season champ. The ACC is known for basketball. At least it was at one time.

---------------------------------------------

LOL. Well, should the Big 12 get their waiver to hold a football championship at 10 schools or should they expand to 12, I'm sure you'll be looking forward to the football championship game being held at Heinz Field.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 11:58 AM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



wrcwolf wrote:

---------------------------------------------
--- 48wolfpacker wrote:


Wufman66 wrote:
wolfer79 wrote:
VegasWolf wrote:
wolfpack87 wrote: It should never leave Greensboro. But that's just me I suppose.
It isn't just you.  This is where it belongs.
since the link says both MSG and the Brooklyn Nets facility declined to bid and the ACC has gone back to them, the university representatives seem to disagree.
Or maybe it's just Swofford who is interested.
If a significant chunk of the university representatives were against it, Swofford wouldn't be going for it. Swofford has to answer to the member institutions. It's not as if he runs the conference without the approval of its members, as so many who like to blame all the failures on Swoff would like to believe.

---------------------------------------------

That's part of his job and why he makes his high salary. As long as the uninformed continually place blame at his feet and not their university president, he's doing his job well.

ONS, I'm sure you are looking forward to your Big 12 holding it's basketball tourney in Charleston, WV or Pittsburgh down the road to accommodate the Mountaineers. For the SEC fans on the board, a tourney will likely be held in Houston and Kansas City before too long. Big Ten holding conference events in Pittsburgh, DC and NYC? Going to happen. That's part of the deal with conference expansion.
Why would the B1G host anything in Pittsburgh? I can see DC (Maryland +huge contingent of B1G alums live in area) or NYC (Rutgers could also throw Philly into the mix), but I don't know why they'd use Pittsburgh. They already host the tournament in Chicago and Indy so what advantage would Pittsburgh offer?

I don't know how you see it, but when it comes to the children, Wu-Tang is for the children.

Last edited 2/4/2013 12:06 PM by Packsman

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 12:10 PM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 


Pittsburgh will be close to the center of the Eastern schools in the conference (OSU, UM, MSU, PSU, MD, Rutgers, Indiana). Great new arena (Consol) and the ability to hold such an event. No clue if Pittsburgh would want to host the Big Ten bball tourney, but they would be in the discussion, if they did.

Btw, talk is that the Big Ten may divide their conferences geographically once MD and Rutgers come aboard, so those schools could be the Eastern Conference.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 12:33 PM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



wrcwolf wrote: Pittsburgh will be close to the center of the Eastern schools in the conference (OSU, UM, MSU, PSU, MD, Rutgers, Indiana). Great new arena (Consol) and the ability to hold such an event. No clue if Pittsburgh would want to host the Big Ten bball tourney, but they would be in the discussion, if they did.

Btw, talk is that the Big Ten may divide their conferences geographically once MD and Rutgers come aboard, so those schools could be the Eastern Conference.
Eh Indy and/or Chicago are closer to 4 of the 7 schools (and Rutgers and PSU don't give a rats *** about BB so really MD is the only one they have to please). If they have it further east look for NYC or DC.

I don't know how you see it, but when it comes to the children, Wu-Tang is for the children.

Last edited 2/4/2013 12:37 PM by Packsman

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 2:05 PM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 


The greensboro coliseum will look totally different this year when the tourney rolls in.  Gone will be the green plastic seats and replaced with a dark blue padded seat.  I have seen the process steadily move and it is going to look so much better than the original green.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 4:52 PM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



jds0881 wrote: The greensboro coliseum will look totally different this year when the tourney rolls in.  Gone will be the green plastic seats and replaced with a dark blue padded seat.  I have seen the process steadily move and it is going to look so much better than the original green.
Oh good, Coach K will feel even more at home in Greensboro now
"I wear NC State gear because I'm going to NC State, you wear UNC gear because you went to Wal-Mart."
Reply | Quote
  • 1321wolf
  • Proud Ron White Fan
  • 4670 posts this site
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 6:11 PM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



wrcwolf wrote:

---------------------------------------------
--- hungrywolf03 wrote:


1321wolf wrote:
flair1 wrote: Think about this, 1000s of world class restaurants within walking or subway distance, Broadway shows, museums, shopping, and basketball. Greensboro can't compete.

I thought the ACC tournament was a basketball game, not a girl's weekend.
Exactly. Its a damn basketball tournament where you spend most of the time in the arena. I live in NYC. Its a fantastic, world class city. The ACC tournament would be an after thought and the arena would be polluted with Sorrycuse fans.

---------------------------------------------

Why should the North Carolina schools have the advantage of polluting the arenas with their fans in Greensboro or Charlotte, as they have for all but 11 ACC Tourneys in it's history?

Who knows, maybe NC State has one less National Championship banner if the '74 Tourney is held at the Cap Center instead of in Greensboro. I know, blasphemy to even think of such a thing.

The conference is made up of members from up and down the East Coast. Rotating the Tourney to different areas seems like the fair thing to do. Having the chance to play the Tourney in the "Mecca of Basketball" is a no brainer, IMO. Maybe not for the fans of North Carolina schools (most of you aren't going if it's in G'boro, NYC or Reynolds anyways), but without question, it would be for the players of North Carolina schools. But who cares about them.
NC State also won ACC championships in DC and Atanta.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/4/2013 7:12 PM

RE: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



PretzelPack wrote: I like Orlando better than Tampa. Isn't the Orlando Arena just as nice as Tampa's. Might not be next to the water, but it is at Disneyland, which is a good tourist destination and it is a good fit for the southern tier being more centrally located for Miami, FSU, GT, and Clemson.
Amway Arena is much better than St. Pete Times Forum IMHO.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/16/2013 6:14 PM

ACC Tourney to MSG for a 5-year run? 


The "Mecca" of basketball for five straight years? What will some of you do? Will Greensboro be able to survive?

If I can make it there/I'll make it anywhere. Can already hear the melody.

It's from the Post, I wouldn't take it seriously yet. But solid move for the ACC, if they can lock up the biggest basketball stage for their biggest basketball event. We'll see.

Big Ten poking around the NYC market as well.

www.nypost.com/p/sports/colleg...dOxZqMmA5Ph1NzN

But suddenly there’s a new player in town. When rumors surfaced the ACC was exploring moving its championship tournament to the Garden, it met a quick end because the ACC wanted to try it on a one-year basis.

Sources said the ACC recently came back to the Garden seeking a five-year deal.

So now the Garden is in a great place: It can go with the ACC, which would bring its tournament to New York for the 2015-16 season. Or it can go with the Catholic 7, which has a deal in place through 2026.

Even if the ACC decided after five years to rotate its tournament site — a move that might be necessary to placate the Southern schools in the league, it would continue to return.

“The Garden is more important to the Catholic 7 than the Catholic 7 is to the Garden,’’ said one source.

If this should happen, if the Catholic 7 doesn’t get its ducks in a row and the Garden goes with the ACC, there could be, let’s call it arena realignment.

Barclays Center has the Atlantic 10 postseason tournament. But if Butler, Xavier and St. Louis, among others, leave the A-10 for the Catholic 7 conference, that league could move to Barclays. Sources said Barclays has even had a couple of “feeling out” conversations with the Big Ten.

Imagine a week like this in the metropolitan area in March — Duke, North Carolina, Syracuse, Indiana, Michigan, Michigan State and all the others — in town. Try getting a hotel room.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/16/2013 6:19 PM

Re: ACC Tourney to MSG for a 5-year run? 



wrcwolf wrote: The "Mecca" of basketball for five straight years? What will some of you do? Will Greensboro be able to survive?

If I can make it there/I'll make it anywhere. Can already hear the melody.

It's from the Post, I wouldn't take it seriously yet. But solid move for the ACC, if they can lock up the biggest basketball stage for their biggest basketball event. We'll see.

Big Ten poking around the NYC market as well.

www.nypost.com/p/sports/colleg...dOxZqMmA5Ph1NzN

But suddenly there’s a new player in town. When rumors surfaced the ACC was exploring moving its championship tournament to the Garden, it met a quick end because the ACC wanted to try it on a one-year basis.

Sources said the ACC recently came back to the Garden seeking a five-year deal.

So now the Garden is in a great place: It can go with the ACC, which would bring its tournament to New York for the 2015-16 season. Or it can go with the Catholic 7, which has a deal in place through 2026.

Even if the ACC decided after five years to rotate its tournament site — a move that might be necessary to placate the Southern schools in the league, it would continue to return.

“The Garden is more important to the Catholic 7 than the Catholic 7 is to the Garden,’’ said one source.

If this should happen, if the Catholic 7 doesn’t get its ducks in a row and the Garden goes with the ACC, there could be, let’s call it arena realignment.

Barclays Center has the Atlantic 10 postseason tournament. But if Butler, Xavier and St. Louis, among others, leave the A-10 for the Catholic 7 conference, that league could move to Barclays. Sources said Barclays has even had a couple of “feeling out” conversations with the Big Ten.

Imagine a week like this in the metropolitan area in March — Duke, North Carolina, Syracuse, Indiana, Michigan, Michigan State and all the others — in town. Try getting a hotel room.
The ACC going to MSG for 5 years would be a slap in the face to all the schools who have supported the tourny for all these years.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/16/2013 6:33 PM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



tmacerus wrote:
Otter74 wrote: With Maryland gone, take DC off the list.  I say do a 3 city rotation.  Atlanta, Greensboro, NY, Greensboro, Atlanta, etc.

I think MD leaving is the reason DC should be put back on the list
+1
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/16/2013 6:49 PM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 



PackFMM wrote:
tmacerus wrote:
Otter74 wrote: With Maryland gone, take DC off the list.  I say do a 3 city rotation.  Atlanta, Greensboro, NY, Greensboro, Atlanta, etc.

I think MD leaving is the reason DC should be put back on the list
+1

**** I'd put it in Baltamore Maryland's first year out of the league just as a giant middle finger to the Terps.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/16/2013 7:04 PM

RE: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 2/16 MSG for 5 years? 


Baltimore only has an old small arena
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/16/2013 7:10 PM

Re: espn: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 


Unfortunately my wallet is emptymad. I am retired, but always a fan.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/16/2013 7:35 PM

RE: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 2/16 MSG for 5 years? 


I started law school in Queens in August and went to the Jimmy V Classic at MSG this year. While I would love for the tournament to be up here for selfish reasons, it should not be in NYC that many years in a row. While expansion was/is a necessary evil, tradition should still be preserved. That's what makes college sports so great. I think that there should be some sort of rotation between locations, or at least it should alternate between Greensboro and NYC. NYC also does not care at all about college sports. I feel like the tournament in NYC would not be close to what it is in Greensboro.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/16/2013 7:39 PM

Re: ACC Tourney to MSG for a 5-year run? 




---------------------------------------------
--- Wufman66 wrote:


wrcwolf wrote: The "Mecca" of basketball for five straight years? What will some of you do? Will Greensboro be able to survive?

If I can make it there/I'll make it anywhere. Can already hear the melody.

It's from the Post, I wouldn't take it seriously yet. But solid move for the ACC, if they can lock up the biggest basketball stage for their biggest basketball event. We'll see.

Big Ten poking around the NYC market as well.

www.nypost.com/p/sports/colleg...dOxZqMmA5Ph1NzN

But suddenly there’s a new player in town. When rumors surfaced the ACC was exploring moving its championship tournament to the Garden, it met a quick end because the ACC wanted to try it on a one-year basis.

Sources said the ACC recently came back to the Garden seeking a five-year deal.

So now the Garden is in a great place: It can go with the ACC, which would bring its tournament to New York for the 2015-16 season. Or it can go with the Catholic 7, which has a deal in place through 2026.

Even if the ACC decided after five years to rotate its tournament site — a move that might be necessary to placate the Southern schools in the league, it would continue to return.

“The Garden is more important to the Catholic 7 than the Catholic 7 is to the Garden,’’ said one source.

If this should happen, if the Catholic 7 doesn’t get its ducks in a row and the Garden goes with the ACC, there could be, let’s call it arena realignment.

Barclays Center has the Atlantic 10 postseason tournament. But if Butler, Xavier and St. Louis, among others, leave the A-10 for the Catholic 7 conference, that league could move to Barclays. Sources said Barclays has even had a couple of “feeling out” conversations with the Big Ten.

Imagine a week like this in the metropolitan area in March — Duke, North Carolina, Syracuse, Indiana, Michigan, Michigan State and all the others — in town. Try getting a hotel room.
The ACC going to MSG for 5 years would be a slap in the face to all the schools who have supported the tourny for all these years.

---------------------------------------------

And, why is that? Have those people been supporting the tournament because it is has always been in Greensboro or have they been supporting their team? A slap in the face is holding it in the same ****** location just because "it's always been that way" and telling new, full members and potential revenue to **** off.

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/16/2013 11:24 PM

Re: ACC to consider NY for MBB ACCT 2/16 MSG for 5 years? 


Horse buggies had a long tradition. So did sailing ships. But sometimes traditions go by the way side.

The ACC has changed. Like it or not, it has to market itself as a modern conference with national importance and relevance. .

Greensboro to the rest of the world is a 5 exits on an interstate. There's ZERO travel appeal. I'm sorry folks, but no one outside of NC wants to go there. I grew up in NC but I'm not spending my money to go spend time in Greensboro and then getting sent packing early to do what? NYC I'll go to shows, Tampa I'll go saltwater fly fishing, DC I'll go flip off the prez, but Greensboro?

The ACC tourney needs to become a bowl like experience for this conference to prosper. NYC (manhattan specifically) is a great place to travel to.
Reply | Quote
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
< Prev.  Page of 6  Next >