Looked around the site....have not idea what exactly you are talking about.  Would like to read...can you link it or give more specific directions as to what I am looking for.

Thanks.

To me it sounds as if he knows his team wont be ready for those types of teams early in the year, so therefore they have to get rid of it because he doesnt want to lose.

He said after the championship game that next year he wants to go undefeated, so getting rid of UNC and us will give him the chance to.

There is certainly a financial component to all of this.

Our program, along with football, funds the other scholarships for all the other student-athletes on this campus. We are doing well throughout our athletics program, but we’ve got to remember that funding is important to every sport.

If we see an opportunity to generate more revenue for our program, we have to take it into consideration. If a neutral site game brings back more dollars for our student-athletes to succeed – whether it’s softball, swimming, tennis or gymnastics – we’ve got to explore that option.

We cannot underestimate that the financial component is a part of it, but it is by no means an overriding part."

Yes, all that money...it's important, you see, because we ...uh...fund other scholarships for all the other student athletes! Yes, that's why we are so interested in all this money, it's the badminton and synchronized swimming teams that we care about! Not money for it's own sake, so that Cal can have a lot of it, that's not even worth mentioning.

silverjackal wrote: The NCAA better change the rules and let these kids go straight to the pros to thwart guys like Cal using guys one semester and done.