|
usc are poor sports.
|
|
|
Posted: 9/15/2012 10:19 PM
usc are poor sports.
thugs! shooting themselves in the foot.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/15/2012 10:26 PM
RE: usc are poor sports.
the new thug U.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/15/2012 11:20 PM
RE: usc are poor sports.
I really cannot stand their coach, Kiffin seems like he is a major d-bag
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- WVUfan23
- Mountain Top
- 9025 posts this site
|
Posted: 9/15/2012 11:21 PM
Re: usc are poor sports.
Huge opportunity for us if they go down, both in the polls/BCS and Heisman race.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/15/2012 11:22 PM
RE: usc are poor sports.
USC goes DOWN!!!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/15/2012 11:22 PM
RE: usc are poor sports.
down goes frazier
Lone Watie: “Get ready, little lady. Hell is coming to breakfast.” ~Outlaw Josey Wales
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/15/2012 11:27 PM
Re: usc are poor sports.
This is all I can think of....(Insert "Barkley" for "Kyle"). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1UWPagjNaA |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/15/2012 11:31 PM
Re: usc are poor sports.
they are just like their coach..a complete scumbag of a person.
can't stand kiffin
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/15/2012 11:46 PM
Re: usc are poor sports.
Kiffin is the most overrated college football coach in history
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/15/2012 11:48 PM
Re: usc are poor sports.
The way they were pouting around on the sidelines when Stanford took the lead surprised me. They looked defeated and there was still loads of time left.
Last edited 9/15/2012 11:50 PM by WHSsax05
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/15/2012 11:55 PM
RE: usc are poor sports.
I think Kiffin's rep is base largely on a couple of things. First, he seems to get coaching credit simply for being the son of Monte Kiffin. Secondly, he is the football version of John Calipari. A slick recruiter and a players coach but not necessarily a great team builder. I just think it's much harder for that style of program building to pay dividends in Football vs Basketball. Coach Cal just has to get 5 all-stars to play together most nights to have a chance at a Final Four. It's much harder to run a loose program of 84 football players and get them to play smart 12 Saturdays in a row. In football, 11 dedicated, focused good athletes can whip 11 unfocused great athletes.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/16/2012 12:11 AM
RE: usc are poor sports.
brokenbones wrote: I think Kiffin's rep is base largely on a couple of things. First, he seems to get coaching credit simply for being the son of Monte Kiffin. Secondly, he is the football version of John Calipari. A slick recruiter and a players coach but not necessarily a great team builder. I just think it's much harder for that style of program building to pay dividends in Football vs Basketball. Coach Cal just has to get 5 all-stars to play together most nights to have a chance at a Final Four. It's much harder to run a loose program of 84 football players and get them to play smart 12 Saturdays in a row. In football, 11 dedicated, focused good athletes can whip 11 unfocused great athletes. agree and it appears to be harder to keep all those Johnny 5-stars focused.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/16/2012 12:21 AM
Re: usc are poor sports.
Can't wait to hear Colon Cowturd making excuses for his team of pretty boys going down! Screw USC!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/16/2012 1:31 AM
Re: usc are poor sports.
I bet USC stays ahead of us in the polls
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/16/2012 2:25 AM
Re: usc are poor sports.
KJ1983 wrote: I bet USC stays ahead of us in the polls not sure if serious. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/16/2012 2:28 AM
Re: usc are poor sports.
KJ1983 wrote: I bet USC stays ahead of us in the polls They lost to an unranked team, there is no way. Edit: #21, my mistake, still too far down the chain. ____________________________________________
"Do you really want to bring up Kansas our worst team whupped Georgia Tech who is the best team in the Big East." - OSUscoutname
"And to think I was a fan of you guys when Matt Schuab played there." - bamahter4ever
Last edited 9/16/2012 2:38 AM by SnogsDontPay4Pizza
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/16/2012 2:29 AM
Re: usc are poor sports.
WVU1andONLY wrote:
KJ1983 wrote: I bet USC stays ahead of us in the polls not sure if serious. Stanford is a Top 25 team....it wouldn't shock me if USC doesn't fall out of the Top 10. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/16/2012 3:31 AM
RE: usc are poor sports.
They will be ranked behind Stanford. How high do you think Stanford will rise in one poll?
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/16/2012 7:38 AM
Re: usc are poor sports.
KJ1983 wrote: I bet USC stays ahead of us in the polls This is the key. Are we now above or below the 1 loss line for top ranked teams falling after their 1 loss? In the past, they would slot in ahead of us. Will be very curious to see if we are now on the right side of that line. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 9/16/2012 7:39 AM
Re: usc are poor sports.
hotcouch wrote: Can't wait to hear Colon Cowturd making excuses for his team of pretty boys going down! Screw USC! They are very thin. In a physical game like Stanford played (LOL, can't believe I just typed that) SC's lack of depth will show. Doubt this is their only loss this season. And yes, Kiffin is an a-hole. So is his Pappy. That is why SC are poor sports. And now that they have lost their shot at a NC, you could see an implosion. Who do they play next?
Last edited 9/16/2012 7:42 AM by juveeer
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
Silver Lot