Posted: Yesterday 6:11 PM
Save your breath, Hill. You're trying to talk logic to a sect of illogical thinking fans.
They believe Manziel clearly played better than Hoyer in the pre-season.
They believe the head coach is only playing Hoyer because they are best friends. They believe Manziel can clearly do better based on... what he did in college.They believe the Browns are winning in spite of Hoyer.They believe the coaches are all idiots because they choosing Hoyer over Manziel. They believe that its not a matter of "if" but "when" Johnny will come in and lead them to a championship.They believe Hoyer is 100% responsible for a lose, and 0% responsible for a win.Not sure how it happened but a little QB from Texas has somehow jedi-mind-fcked a large section of posters into thinking he's some sort of QB messiah when In actuality... he'll be a longshot to become even a competent starter in the league.There's no talking to these people. You'd have more success growing money on trees. Did someone say money? Ahhhh yeeeeah!
I could be suave... but how many crude guys do you know?
Posted: Yesterday 10:15 PM
Posted: Yesterday 6:49 PM
Posted: Yesterday 6:35 PM
Last edited Yesterday 10:38 PM by LesTaxus
Posted: Yesterday 6:04 PM
80sBoy wrote: dennn wrote: They won't pull the QB if he wins... It doesn't matter how ugly the win is.. I want to see JFF this year.. But not while the team is winning.... I call this the Derek Anderson effect.After the year DA took us to 10-6, I wanted to find a new QB. But I completely understood why a team would stick with a QB that helped get them to 10-6 for the first time in a long time.I like the hometown Hoyer story, and I like the guy as a person from what I have seen, but when it comes down to the W-L, I don't give a crap if we have some swan-riding cowboy behind center if the guy can lead us to the promised land better than the other guy. I don't care if he downward dogged all of those yoga students in his Snickers commercial while doing lines of salty caramel off their backs.So right now, I trust exactly what MHill has said - that they are all about the best player playing, and that is what is happening.
dennn wrote: They won't pull the QB if he wins... It doesn't matter how ugly the win is.. I want to see JFF this year.. But not while the team is winning....
Posted: Yesterday 5:17 PM
JackTBurton wrote: Actually we did or deserved it.Problem is this shouldn't have even been a ball gameSettled for threesPicked off in the endzoneIt should have been an ass kicking instead of a come from behind.I am cool but sorry man, this kid is out of excuses and "buts...."------------------------------------------------ 80sBoy wrote:We really had no business winning this game.But we did. That's what good teams do.Some previous games, we've played better ball but found a way to lose. I think pulling this one out will only strengthen this team and build upon the winning mindset. My biggest question is how much of the disconnect between Hoyer and Gordon was due to route running and work between the two. The only play I really questioned by Hoyer was the end zone jump ball on 1st down. If that was supposed to be a throw away it should have been better. Looking forward to what Lane finds out.---------------------------------------------
Last edited Yesterday 5:20 PM by 80sBoy
Posted: Yesterday 5:08 PM
Posted: Yesterday 4:10 PM
Posted: Yesterday 4:09 PM
drbrownsfan wrote: HAHhahahahahhaha. I called it. F u. Dumb a s s s. Screw u.
Posted: Yesterday 3:56 PM