|
RE: Should we have a "Hole" FFL?
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2010 6:03 PM
RE: Should we have a "Hole" FFL?
I recommend random deletings for random bumps.
Misses the band moderately less. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2010 6:18 PM
Re: Should we have a "Hole" FFL?
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2010 8:22 PM
Re: Should we have a "Hole" FFL?
Do you really need to bump a thread when page one still has last posts from 2 weeks ago?
--------------------  |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2010 8:54 PM
Re: Should we have a "Hole" FFL?
acejack wrote: Do you really need to bump a thread when page one still has last posts from 2 weeks ago? 
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2010 9:02 PM
Re: OBR The Hole Fantasy Football League information
Javert wrote: Lots of interest.
Apparently 12 players + "Lots of interest" = Plea for a pin. (Not to mention, it takes a month for topics to fall of the front page around here.) Javert, Javert, Javert....... and you wonder why you are so fun to hate on.
I could be suave... but how many crude guys do you know? |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2010 9:30 AM
RE: Should we have a "Hole" FFL?
Koesters wrote: I recommend random deletings for random bumps.  You know, if you delete a "bump" reply, the thread falls back into it's previous place! You realize that, don't you? Try it Chopper... you might find it a valuable tool for certain tools!
Last edited 8/17/2010 9:32 AM by YankeeBigDog
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2010 9:34 AM
RE: Should we have a "Hole" FFL?
YankeeBigDog wrote:
Koesters wrote: I recommend random deletings for random bumps.
You know, if you delete a "bump" reply, the thread falls back into it's previous place! You realize that, don't you?
Try it... you might find it a valuable tool for certain tools! Yep, I'm well aware of that, but that was only a portion of what I was thinking. I think the "bump" needs to be deleted, but then also one other random post in the thread. I recommend the random deleting being a random post with information relevant to the FFL. 
Misses the band moderately less. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2010 10:03 AM
RE: Should we have a "Hole" FFL?
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/22/2010 10:42 AM
Re: Should we have a "Hole" FFL?
I joined today as the Slackers. There are still only nine teams. You might have to move the draft to a later date or reduce the number of teams to ten. I don't think they'll let you do a nine team league. Hope it works out.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/23/2010 1:44 PM
Re: Should we have a "Hole" FFL?
Saw you were still looking for a couple of teams, so I lessened the demand by one. I was number ten, so there are still two more openings available. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/24/2010 2:07 PM
Re: Should we have a "Hole" FFL?
ironballs84 wrote: Saw you were still looking for a couple of teams, so I lessened the demand by one. I was number ten, so there are still two more openings available. Draft tomorrow night. We need 2 more team. C'mon Browns fans!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2010 3:03 PM
Re: Should we have a "Hole" FFL?
Any spots left? I'm in if there are.
"There's a gleam, men! There's a gleam! Let's get that gleam!" |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 2:10 AM
Re: Should we have a "Hole" FFL?
Let me guess, Javvy autodrafted, never set his lineup and won?
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
The TAP Room