Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)

The Grammys

Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 10:42 AM

The Grammys 


In between picking selected shows off the DVR, we managed to catch select performances from the Grammys. Well, pieces of them as they all sucked. And according to Twitter, these were not isolated occurrences.

In related news, rumors of the authorities releasing John Lennon's killer to euthanize McCartney are just speculative at this time.

    What would you rather watch all evening?

  1. Poll closed on 02/20/2012
  2. The Grammys: 5 votes
  3. CASH's video of him taking a dump: 7 votes
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 11:02 AM

RE: The Grammys 


You would have to pay me to sit through the Grammys. The only awards show worth watching is the Golden Globes when Ricky Gervais is hosting. The Globes do it right - they serve booze, let the host bust on the stars a bit, and do a better job of picking winners. Compare them to the Oscars - the Globes picked E.T. over Gandhi, Saving Private Ryan over Shakespeare in Love, and Brokeback Mountain over Crash. And they do it all while Ricky Gervais makes jokes about Mel Gibson being a drunken ****** right to his face.


I know how men in exile feed on dreams of hope.
- Aeschylus (525 BC - 456 BC), Agamemnon

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 11:08 AM

Re: The Grammys 


Any awards show is about the same as watching the Pro Bowl.

It's an idea that has jumped the deceased shark.

The "Extravaganza" went out with Ziegfeld's Follies!
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 12:04 PM

Re: The Grammys 



YankeeBigDog wrote: Any awards show is about the same as watching the Pro Bowl.

It's an idea that has jumped the deceased shark.

The "Extravaganza" went out with Ziegfeld's Follies!
I couldn't agree more

When the stars watch me get the Slacky for message board poster of the year, then I'll give a crap about them fellating each other on their accomplishments. Until then, they are just a bunch of drama or band geeks who happen to make a lot of money. 

True story: I was  drinking this weekend with a guy that went to HS with Axl Rose. Said he was really stupid - couldn't even pass shop. And was kind of a greasy little nothing punk that nobody liked. None of this comes as a surprise to me.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 12:13 PM

Re: The Grammys 



DawgEDue wrote:
watch me get the Slacky for message board poster of the year
As. If.


I know how men in exile feed on dreams of hope.
- Aeschylus (525 BC - 456 BC), Agamemnon

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 12:28 PM

Re: The Grammys 



bobbyflats wrote:
DawgEDue wrote:
watch me get the Slacky for message board poster of the year
As. If.
Child please. I'm the Adele* of this board to your Lady Gaga.



* I had no idea who Adele was before yesterday. Still really don't noidea
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 12:32 PM

Re: The Grammys 


You never heard of The Farmer and Adele nursery rhyme?
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 12:34 PM

Re: The Grammys 



donnyunitas wrote: You never heard of The Farmer and Adele nursery rhyme?


maybe I should go back on hiatus...
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 12:47 PM

Re: The Grammys 



YankeeBigDog wrote: Any awards show is about the same as watching the Pro Bowl.

It's an idea that has jumped the deceased shark.
A couple of years ago I would have agreed with you, but Ricky Gervais reinvented the Awards Show as a roast, and I think the concept really works well.


I know how men in exile feed on dreams of hope.
- Aeschylus (525 BC - 456 BC), Agamemnon

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 2:16 PM

Re: The Grammys 


Broke the 2-2 tie.

However, I thought that was Ryan Getty take a dump in CASH's flick was it not?     confused10.gif
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 2:30 PM

Re: The Grammys 


Tied again.

No, that was our man CASH.

crazy
I had a job to do. My work here is done. The Browns are now ready.
~Me
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 2:31 PM

Re: The Grammys 


Ok but I guess Ryan Getty was a trend setter.  wink
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 2:42 PM

Re: The Grammys 



Harpster wrote: Ok but I guess Ryan Getty was a trend setter.  wink
Yeah... HOF, first ballot.

Sounds like a POLL!!!!!


Do it, somebody. My memory is bad. Just please include BenglasRulez
I had a job to do. My work here is done. The Browns are now ready.
~Me
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 3:04 PM

Re: The Grammys 


I nominate olecowboy.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 3:17 PM

Re: The Grammys 



DrPGroove wrote:
Harpster wrote: Ok but I guess Ryan Getty was a trend setter.  wink
Yeah... HOF, first ballot.

Sounds like a POLL!!!!!


Do it, somebody. My memory is bad. Just please include BenglasRulez
...and Butch2K
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 5:48 PM

RE: The Grammys 


Speaking of notable names, kcatthebat is gonna have an illustrious career around here. zkrampesque.


I know how men in exile feed on dreams of hope.
- Aeschylus (525 BC - 456 BC), Agamemnon

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/13/2012 5:52 PM

RE: The Grammys 



That poster ain't no rookie.
 
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/14/2012 1:55 AM

RE: The Grammys 


INTRIGUE!


I know how men in exile feed on dreams of hope.
- Aeschylus (525 BC - 456 BC), Agamemnon

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/14/2012 9:23 AM

smdh 



bobbyflats wrote: Speaking of notable names, kcatthebat is gonna have an illustrious career around here. zkrampesque.
I'd be willing to bet that I've deleted 3/4 of the threads he has started in Cavland.

Misses the band moderately less.

Reply | Quote