HAM:

up, that was me, on Shwartz...doesn't look Jewish because you can't see the yamika (sp) under his helmet.

AA:

One head shot shows no yarmulka covering wavy, blondish hair.  He looks quintessentially Californian.
I guess this is a category like "straight men who act gay:"  "Jewish men who look WASPy."

HAM:

Quick, when you...and yall, are watching the 2012 top 100 players on NFLN, as they are announced...ask yourself, was was his draft rating anyway? Reach? Value? Coulda had him in the next round? Browns have at least two this year...

Maybe a point will fall out of the sky and hit ya in the Head...
Maybe not..

AA:

Maybe you'll actually have a point to toss from on high.

I look at Mayock's top 100 for the NFLN, and he had Richardson 3rd, Weeden 35th and Schwartz 62nd.
Those seem pretty reasonable.  Granted, lots of variables can cause certain prospects to move up and down... wha 10-20%?  Both moved up 40% from there.  That's a pretty good jump.   Not like Tannehill jumping from 19 to 8, but still enough to warrant at least raised eyebrows.

Aardvark wrote:

Cheese,
You are an ignorant man.

Cheese,
You are an ignorant man.

AA:

Have a football take, and don't suck.

Aardvark wrote: Cheese,
You are an ignorant man.

AA:

Have a football take, and don't suck.

Cheese,
When have you had a take that doesn't suck?
Answer virtually never.
They all suck.

And half of your takes aren't really football related at that, they are nagging on sentence structure and bassackward Philosophy, and other such BS. You pawn off as knowlege...

So while we are handing out advice...

Get a clue.