Posted: 2/8/2012 3:33 PM
Posted: 2/8/2012 3:54 PM
gadfly23 wrote: "The passing game is exponentially more important today than it was even then. "I just think you guys who discuss this topic "run game vs pass game" are tending to disassociatethese two aspects of the game too much. Even if I conceded that the passing game - especially if you are in possession of an elite QB - is somewhat ascendant, I cannot ignore or reject the importance of a strong run game - especially if you don't have an elite QB - which 75% of the league does not.Those Giant stats are very misleading. Look at their running stats versus regular season....they ran much more successfully in the post season. IMO it was the distinct advantage they had over New England in the SB. Fact is STRONG RUNNING game only enhances STRONG PASSING game, it in no way detracts from it.I would much rather line up in 2012 with Flynn/McCoy + Richardson/Hillis + Jeffery/Little/Cribbsthan I would with Flynn/McCoy + Hillis/Hardesty + Jeffery/Little/Cribbs. Two genuine threats at RB + 3 BIG receivers - works BETTER TOGETHER!4th quarter, need 1 first down to seal victory - do you want SOLID double threat run + pass or"we can really only pass" kinda team?All of this doubles in relevance IF YOU PLAY OUTSIDE + DON'T HAVE ELITE QB (which 75% ofleague uncluding us) do not have.
Posted: 2/8/2012 4:30 PM
Posted: 2/8/2012 4:32 PM
Posted: 2/8/2012 5:28 PM
I survived the 4th worst owner in NFL history. 48-103 (.318). Lowest of any owner that wasn't expansion or WWII
Posted: 2/8/2012 7:36 PM
Last edited 2/8/2012 8:32 PM by gadfly23
Copyright © 2013
and Scout.com. All rights reserved. This website is an unofficial independent source of news and information, and is not affiliated with any school, team, or league.
MSN PrivacyLegalAdvertise on MSNAbout our adsRSS
© 2012 Microsoft|