|
RE: Ten on ?
|
|
|
Posted: 8/22/2011 1:05 PM
RE: Ten on ?
Aardvark wrote: Sorry. Working furiously towards a deadline (though obviously not THAT furiously if I sneaked a quick peek here) before I take off for a locale where their idea of a sports bar would be 24/7 HILLYBILLY HANFISHIN' (that means no "10" following the Thursday game either).
Thought the last game produced plenty of discussion points and am frankly surprised folks here are still stuck in Eric the Dtouchebag mode.
Yankee... can't (*gasp*)... go on... pick up the flag... Picks up flag... puts it back in back pocket!I know what you mean... I was so far out in the boonies, the motel had DTV, but it didn't even carry ESPN! That was sort of a mixed blessing, but I had to wait until I got back Sunday night to even get the scores.  Didn't realize until then how bad a football junkie I am! Or how much I looked forward to that feature and it's participants. Goes back to lurking.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/22/2011 7:37 PM
RE: Ten on ?
Just like Vark, just missing the depth, the detail, and the dry humor.....
1. Owen Marcecik does not impress. Matter of fact, he dis-impressed me. Dude looks doughy and slow. Doesn't look like a blocker, a rusher or a receiver. And sure as hell doesn't look like an NFL linebacker. We passed on Casey Matthews for that?
2. Jordan Cameron, or Cameron Jordan, is not going to be the next Antonio Gates without some major seasoning. He's got a ways to go before he can back up Evan Moore.
3. Second preseason game and the injury bug is chewing on the seams of the roster. Precautionary, no sweat. But when Ray Ventrone is a starting safety, your team has issues. For all of us who wanted some FA action, heads be shaking.
4. Speaking of FA action, what if this team using the cake opening schedule and the improved offense to spring off to a great start, and then totally collapses due to injuries and the lack of vet depth. Wouldn't that be a b i t c h?
5. I keyed on Maiava for a while. On the first series he got punked a bit, but he looked better as he got more reps. He's built enough, and has some speed.
6. Hey, I saw DQ make a tackle behind the LOS! No, really! (Nobody in the lockerroom better even look at DQ's pecs, if he stays healthy, he'll be a better MLB than he's shown to date).
7. Haden got toasted three times in a hurry. Don't read those press clips just yet, Joe. He did bust Burleson once, and got up in his face about it.
8. I thought Shurmur was channeling Mangini by starting Alex Smith at TE. I realize Watson was injured, but really? Then Smith showed his stuff by dropping the first ball thrown to him.
9. Our third team sucks. That's relative to all third teams, so they suck really, really hard.
10. Inefficient efficiency. Sloppy, but on point at the critical moment. Efficiency is good. We may have forgotten what it looked like.
>>> Decleater <<<
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/22/2011 10:04 PM
RE: Ten on ?
Gameface64 wrote: Just like Vark, just missing the depth, the detail, and the dry humor.....
1. Owen Marcecik does not impress. Matter of fact, he dis-impressed me. Dude looks doughy and slow. Doesn't look like a blocker, a rusher or a receiver. And sure as hell doesn't look like an NFL linebacker. We passed on Casey Matthews for that?
2. Jordan Cameron, or Cameron Jordan, is not going to be the next Antonio Gates without some major seasoning. He's got a ways to go before he can back up Evan Moore.
3. Second preseason game and the injury bug is chewing on the seams of the roster. Precautionary, no sweat. But when Ray Ventrone is a starting safety, your team has issues. For all of us who wanted some FA action, heads be shaking.
4. Speaking of FA action, what if this team using the cake opening schedule and the improved offense to spring off to a great start, and then totally collapses due to injuries and the lack of vet depth. Wouldn't that be a b i t c h?
5. I keyed on Maiava for a while. On the first series he got punked a bit, but he looked better as he got more reps. He's built enough, and has some speed.
6. Hey, I saw DQ make a tackle behind the LOS! No, really! (Nobody in the lockerroom better even look at DQ's pecs, if he stays healthy, he'll be a better MLB than he's shown to date).
7. Haden got toasted three times in a hurry. Don't read those press clips just yet, Joe. He did bust Burleson once, and got up in his face about it.
8. I thought Shurmur was channeling Mangini by starting Alex Smith at TE. I realize Watson was injured, but really? Then Smith showed his stuff by dropping the first ball thrown to him.
9. Our third team sucks. That's relative to all third teams, so they suck really, really hard.
10. Inefficient efficiency. Sloppy, but on point at the critical moment. Efficiency is good. We may have forgotten what it looked like. SD: Our QB looked like he knew what he was doing for the second week in a row ratio stands at 5 TD's to zero picks with Philly on deck. In addition to nyquil doing a WTF play , Jabal Sheard actually stripped a ball carrier and recovered his own forced fumble , we got a preseason worth of defense on two plays . Looks like Shurmurs decision to call his own plays is working . Skinny little corner whose name escapes me but wears long Johns aka Felix Wright maybe our future corner to match with Haden , looked good there and at safety James Dockery #34 . Would like to see Titus brown at OLB starting instead of just backing up Nyquil , Gocong is JAG and has pictures on Heckert. We need another third string QB Jarrett Brown is all arm all feet and clueless . Agree on Marecic , Vickers never looked so good , and Casey Mathews is starting at MLB for the Iggles. SoulDawg
WAR : OUR TIME HAS COME
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/22/2011 10:31 PM
RE: Ten on ?
1) Owen Merceric (sp?) is a rookie and is just playing like one. I believe he will improve quickly enough though. 2) Game you now confused me, is it Jordan Cameron or Cameron Jordan? Which ever it is, he is also playing like a rookie, but many rookie TE's (or fullbacks for that matter) seldom see the field their first year. 3)Titus Young please get healthy. As SD said though, I also like Dockery. 4) Stay the course. Just re-signed JT, and that makes me happier than SD in an argument. 5) Maiava, looked decent IMO. Not pro bowl talent, but better than some we have used in the past. 6) DQ is gonna love Taylor who is not a free lancer keeping those offensive linemen from getting to him so often, it allows him to do what he does best. Use his speed. 7) Haden for as much as we all love him, is still only a second year player. With a new coach to boot. He will be ok IMO 8) Alex Smith? Yeah Watson was hurt, but Alex Smith may have cost himself a roster spot with his drop. 9) Our third team does suck. Jarrett Brown, has accuracy issues. Well, I am not even sure we can call them that, his throws were so far off line. 10) Sloppy yes, and our O-line needs time to gel with Steiny out. Colt was running for his life and picking himself up off the ground way to much. Be interesting to see how they do against Philly.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/24/2011 8:47 AM
RE: Ten on ?
Gameface64 wrote: Just like Vark, just missing the depth, the detail, and the dry humor.....
1. Owen Marcecik does not impress. Matter of fact, he dis-impressed me. Dude looks doughy and slow. Doesn't look like a blocker, a rusher or a receiver. And sure as hell doesn't look like an NFL linebacker. We passed on Casey Matthews for that?
- At this point if Marecic can equal what Vickers brought to the table, it would be a miracle. At minimum we knew Vickers could block, and just how many passes does anyone really think Marecic is going to catch? Wasted pick.
2. Jordan Cameron, or Cameron Jordan, is not going to be the next Antonio Gates without some major seasoning. He's got a ways to go before he can back up Evan Moore.
Like the kids potential, but could have had him for less than a 4th round pick.
3. Second preseason game and the injury bug is chewing on the seams of the roster. Precautionary, no sweat. But when Ray Ventrone is a starting safety, your team has issues. For all of us who wanted some FA action, heads be shaking.
As bad as that is, if Colt Mccoy goes down we're sunk. Wallace stinks. Good backup my a s s. For someone who " knows" the offense, he's looked like s h i t. He's so short he makes CM look tall by comparsion. And after 10 years in the league, this guy still can only read half the field. Useless.
4. Speaking of FA action, what if this team using the cake opening schedule and the improved offense to spring off to a great start, and then totally collapses due to injuries and the lack of vet depth. Wouldn't that be a b i t c h?
Nah. You have to draw a line in the sand somewhere. Vet backup or unproven rookie, does it really matter? Didn't seem to when Greco played against Detroit. Pinkston was much better. Steinbach and that $6 million contract could be up the road.
5. I keyed on Maiava for a while. On the first series he got punked a bit, but he looked better as he got more reps. He's built enough, and has some speed.
He's ok as a backup, but our starters suck as a whole. If we needed anything in the draft or FA it was Lbers. Yet we spend our picks on FB's and TE's we don't really need. Go figure.
6. Hey, I saw DQ make a tackle behind the LOS! No, really! (Nobody in the lockerroom better even look at DQ's pecs, if he stays healthy, he'll be a better MLB than he's shown to date).
Our best Lber would be a backup on most teams.
7. Haden got toasted three times in a hurry. Don't read those press clips just yet, Joe. He did bust Burleson once, and got up in his face about it.
Like Colt, Joe has only started a handful of games. Some passes can't be broken up. Joe got beat a few times but it wasn't like he got toasted the way Wright did last year. He had good coverage on those plays. Perfect passes will beat every CB.
8. I thought Shurmur was channeling Mangini by starting Alex Smith at TE. I realize Watson was injured, but really? Then Smith showed his stuff by dropping the first ball thrown to him.
Doubt he makes the roster. TE's like Smith can be picked up at any time.
9. Our third team sucks. That's relative to all third teams, so they suck really, really hard.
The bottom of the roster looks pretty thin alright. I'm sure TH will try to upgrade the bottom with other teams roster cuts.
10. Inefficient efficiency. Sloppy, but on point at the critical moment. Efficiency is good. We may have forgotten what it looked like.
Considering all the lost time, I think they have done pretty well. The lack of off season conditioning showed up in the last game. They should round into form just in time for the 1st game.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/24/2011 9:45 AM
RE: Ten on ?
Gameface64 wrote: Just like Vark, just missing the depth, the detail, and the dry humor.....
1. Owen Marcecik does not impress. Matter of fact, he dis-impressed me. Dude looks doughy and slow. Doesn't look like a blocker, a rusher or a receiver. And sure as hell doesn't look like an NFL linebacker. We passed on Casey Matthews for that?
2. Jordan Cameron, or Cameron Jordan, is not going to be the next Antonio Gates without some major seasoning. He's got a ways to go before he can back up Evan Moore.
Gotta love the patience and lack of panic here. ;-) No OTA's, No uOTA's informally, abbreviated TC, and 2 whole X games in Marecic is a career bust or special teamer and JC is too raw to contribute for a long time. Awe righty then.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/24/2011 2:37 PM
RE: Ten on ?
Nas,
Did I say career bust, or was that you? Immediate contributor? I think not.
And by any chance, did you see what Antonio Gates looked like in season one? Give me a yell when JC looks like dat. If it's three years from now, I'll be happy. Same for Marcecik.
I like Heckert, Doesn't mean he's foolproof.
>>> Decleater <<<
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2011 8:44 AM
RE: Ten on ?
Gameface64 wrote: Nas,
Did I say career bust, or was that you? Immediate contributor? I think not.
And by any chance, did you see what Antonio Gates looked like in season one? Give me a yell when JC looks like dat. If it's three years from now, I'll be happy. Same for Marcecik.
I like Heckert, Doesn't mean he's foolproof. Well, I for one didn't expect Cribbs to be a pro bowl player like gates. If ur disappoined that every UDFA isn't Gates ur gonna be a down mother scratcher 24/7/365 . I personally think Cribbs has made fantastic strides. The guy who looked completely uncomfortable when he ball was in the air is now making veteran moves. He's not a pro bowler, but he looks the part of a strating 2. He looks a damn site better than anything we've seen of the dynamic Mangina duo. JC looks solid finally. By any measure, the weeping and moaning over Marecic is premature and stupid. Spin that all you want. He's a de facto immediate contributor as there is not Plan B. I was a HUGE proponant of keeping Vickers. Pointed out he was a projected finesse FB when he came out of Bolder. No one said he was Johnston. They all said Centers. But he did what his coaches wanted , excelled, and he was diminished in his skill set evaluation for it IMO. Not given any fair chance to shake the rust off being anything but a 3rd guard. Well he's gone now. Boo frickin hoo. Owen Marecic has not had the benefit of any meaningful NFL coaching or S&C. It has been TWO X ganes with 3 quarters of play. A draftee doesn't pan out for final evaluation for 2 / 3 years. Does he look good right now? nah. Should he even be evaluated at all until October? Nope. You may not have called him a bust yourself, but I'm not just speaking to you. I am addressing a subject. Scan the posts on him. He's a situation of new guy GM coming in and needlessly creating a hole chucking a bona fide decent NFL role player and handing his own guy a job. We've seen this so many times here. Savage made a living using this as an excuse. Let's just hope that Wimbley and Vckers end Heckert's tomfoolery in this regard.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2011 9:19 AM
RE: Ten on ?
Nasdaq wrote:
Well, I for one didn't expect Cribbs to be a pro bowl player like gates. If ur disappoined that every UDFA isn't Gates ur gonna be a down mother scratcher 24/7/365 .
I personally think Cribbs has made fantastic strides. The guy who looked completely uncomfortable when he ball was in the air is now making veteran moves. He's not a pro bowler, but he looks the part of a strating 2. He looks a damn site better than anything we've seen of the dynamic Mangina duo. JC looks solid finally.
By any measure, the weeping and moaning over Marecic is premature and stupid. Spin that all you want. He's a de facto immediate contributor as there is not Plan B. I was a HUGE proponant of keeping Vickers. Pointed out he was a projected finesse FB when he came out of Bolder. No one said he was Johnston. They all said Centers. But he did what his coaches wanted , excelled, and he was diminished in his skill set evaluation for it IMO. Not given any fair chance to shake the rust off being anything but a 3rd guard. Well he's gone now. Boo frickin hoo.
Owen Marecic has not had the benefit of any meaningful NFL coaching or S&C. It has been TWO X ganes with 3 quarters of play. A draftee doesn't pan out for final evaluation for 2 / 3 years.
Does he look good right now? nah. Should he even be evaluated at all until October? Nope. You may not have called him a bust yourself, but I'm not just speaking to you. I am addressing a subject. Scan the posts on him.
He's a situation of new guy GM coming in and needlessly creating a hole chucking a bona fide decent NFL role player and handing his own guy a job. We've seen this so many times here. Savage made a living using this as an excuse. Let's just hope that Wimbley and Vckers end Heckert's tomfoolery in this regard. Ahhhh Nas, the voice of calm and reasoned patience. ; ) Let me clarify, since you're extrapolating my POV to cover a general opinion about Marecic. I was simply making an observation about the physical presence of two drafted players. The eyeball test. I've seen lots of rooks and UDFA's who were raw, but you could grok their potential easily. They might be in the wrong place, but they got there quickly. Or perhaps they threw a block in the wrong hole and the play failed, but they knocked someone on their ass. I don't see that in Marecic, but it is early. However, in the context of the 2011 Cleveland Browns, we don't have a lot of time to f;;:k around with 4th rounders who can't fill one of the many, many soft spots on the roster. Same with Cameron. I remember Tom Rathman, and the versatility he brought. Maybe Vickers was never going to be that fluid in the West Coast. Marecic just doesn't seem to have that kind of pop. Cameron looked like he had heavy feet, if that description makes sense. The point about Gates was you could see the athleticism from the jump off. He might have needed to learn football, and routes, and even blocking, but there was an element of superiority in him. Again, to my untrained eye, Cameron didn't look like he could run away from most defenders. Perhaps he can learn body control and muscle people, but he's nowhwere near Evan Moore. And both Moore and Cribbs flashed talent very early on. I'll be the first to admit to being wrong about players.....once or twice. But I've been watching football a long time, and in general, trust my eyes. I hope those two guys become awesome weapons, I just don't see them being very valuable this year. You're cool with that, I see a missed opportunity to strengthen the team quickly. Yep, two X games, no OTA's, etc etc. And we're already dinged up as a 74 Pinto. Young guys that can't add something, unfortunately, are going to be liabilities.
>>> Decleater <<<
Last edited 8/25/2011 9:22 AM by Gameface64
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2011 9:28 AM
RE: Ten on ?
Gameface64 wrote: However, in the context of the 2011 Cleveland Browns, we don't have a lot of time to f;;:k around with 4th rounders who can't fill one of the many, many soft spots on the roster. Same with Cameron.
Right. Because we're bona fide playoff centenders this year. Are you high already in the day? This season is tantamount to 16 X games. It's straight up developmental. We gots nothing BUTT time to F around with 4th rounder project types. That was clear when Heckgren sat on his hands in FA after the labor stoppage an dthe 1st year HC installing new stsyens and re-boot number 5 in BTNG. Tom rathman. Tom Rathman? Rathman was a F'n one dimentional battering ram leading Osbourns' I backs and didn't routinely start until year three. He was given 2 years to develop before being the full time starter and one of those was a flat out ST red shirt season. . And if Maricic isn't that in 2 X saeson games he lacks that versitility. F me. Just F me. "Tom Rathman".
Last edited 8/25/2011 9:32 AM by Nasdaq
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2011 10:46 AM
RE: Ten on ?
Of course we're not bonafide contenders this year. But take a look at the cupcake schedule we have and consider that this might be a year to get a winning tradition started. Y'know, 7 games might be nice.
If you want to f""k something, let's f"""k the "we have all the time in the world" philosophy of rebuilding.
It's not even that, it's making the most out of every draft pick, because the roster is thinner than an Olsen twin. If a guy looks slow and soft, it's not because he needs more coaching or three years to develop.
And on a side note:
I wasn't name checking Rathman the college player. I was talking about Rathman the pro vs. Vickers the pro in the context of the West Coast offense.
In his 4th season, TR had 79 carries and 73 catches and over 900 yards combined. My comment was that perhaps the FO saw that Vickers would never approach that, and they drafted Marecic to be that type of West Coast FB.
>>> Decleater <<<
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2011 12:01 PM
RE: Ten on ?
One last groan about Vickers and then I'm done on the subject. Since when do you draft a starting player in the 4th round and just plug him in with out any competition?
What would the harm be in keeping Vickers in 2011 while Marecic could be brought along?
It was just same old same old....making an unneccessary hole and then using valuable resources to fill it. More spinning our wheels for no good reason. Vickers signed with the Texans for pennies.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2011 3:04 PM
RE: Ten on ?
Operative term being "year 4" my friend. Not X game two.
Vickers did what Vickers was sked to do and he did it well.
The other issue would be the current orgs' pro player evaluation ability. Love the draft but the pro personnel aspect has hardly blown me away.
Any way, we're stuck with kid. Jus sayin' let's be realistic in his development curve.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2011 10:31 PM
RE: Ten on ?
Gameface64 wrote: Just like Vark, just missing the depth, the detail, and the dry humor.....
1. Owen Marcecik does not impress. Matter of fact, he dis-impressed me. Dude looks doughy and slow. Doesn't look like a blocker, a rusher or a receiver. And sure as hell doesn't look like an NFL linebacker. We passed on Casey Matthews for that?
2. Jordan Cameron, or Cameron Jordan, is not going to be the next Antonio Gates without some major seasoning. He's got a ways to go before he can back up Evan Moore.
3. Second preseason game and the injury bug is chewing on the seams of the roster. Precautionary, no sweat. But when Ray Ventrone is a starting safety, your team has issues. For all of us who wanted some FA action, heads be shaking.
4. Speaking of FA action, what if this team using the cake opening schedule and the improved offense to spring off to a great start, and then totally collapses due to injuries and the lack of vet depth. Wouldn't that be a b i t c h?
5. I keyed on Maiava for a while. On the first series he got punked a bit, but he looked better as he got more reps. He's built enough, and has some speed.
6. Hey, I saw DQ make a tackle behind the LOS! No, really! (Nobody in the lockerroom better even look at DQ's pecs, if he stays healthy, he'll be a better MLB than he's shown to date).
7. Haden got toasted three times in a hurry. Don't read those press clips just yet, Joe. He did bust Burleson once, and got up in his face about it.
8. I thought Shurmur was channeling Mangini by starting Alex Smith at TE. I realize Watson was injured, but really? Then Smith showed his stuff by dropping the first ball thrown to him.
9. Our third team sucks. That's relative to all third teams, so they suck really, really hard.
10. Inefficient efficiency. Sloppy, but on point at the critical moment. Efficiency is good. We may have forgotten what it looked like. serious question. did any of the cleveland media press shurmur/heckert/holmgren about the lack of FA? We could use depth and it seems nobody talks about the issue anymore--it's a dead issue--the media seems scared to bring it up. Haven't seen it in the papers much. the new regime SHOULD be more open than Mangini--right?
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2011 10:44 PM
RE: Ten on ?
Nasdaq wrote: Gameface64 wrote: Nas,
Did I say career bust, or was that you? Immediate contributor? I think not.
And by any chance, did you see what Antonio Gates looked like in season one? Give me a yell when JC looks like dat. If it's three years from now, I'll be happy. Same for Marcecik.
I like Heckert, Doesn't mean he's foolproof. Well, I for one didn't expect Cribbs to be a pro bowl player like gates. If ur disappoined that every UDFA isn't Gates ur gonna be a down mother scratcher 24/7/365 .
I personally think Cribbs has made fantastic strides. The guy who looked completely uncomfortable when he ball was in the air is now making veteran moves. He's not a pro bowler, but he looks the part of a strating 2. He looks a damn site better than anything we've seen of the dynamic Mangina duo. JC looks solid finally.
By any measure, the weeping and moaning over Marecic is premature and stupid. Spin that all you want. He's a de facto immediate contributor as there is not Plan B. I was a HUGE proponant of keeping Vickers. Pointed out he was a projected finesse FB when he came out of Bolder. No one said he was Johnston. They all said Centers. But he did what his coaches wanted , excelled, and he was diminished in his skill set evaluation for it IMO. Not given any fair chance to shake the rust off being anything but a 3rd guard. Well he's gone now. Boo frickin hoo.
Owen Marecic has not had the benefit of any meaningful NFL coaching or S&C. It has been TWO X ganes with 3 quarters of play. A draftee doesn't pan out for final evaluation for 2 / 3 years.
Does he look good right now? nah. Should he even be evaluated at all until October? Nope. You may not have called him a bust yourself, but I'm not just speaking to you. I am addressing a subject. Scan the posts on him.
He's a situation of new guy GM coming in and needlessly creating a hole chucking a bona fide decent NFL role player and handing his own guy a job. We've seen this so many times here. Savage made a living using this as an excuse. Let's just hope that Wimbley and Vckers end Heckert's tomfoolery in this regard. but has the media called heckert out on this? it seems like the media in cleveland has failed in its role of providing good coverage. 1) they didn't address the point of hole creation--dumping good talent for unproven talent--ie. Winslow/Edwards for Robiskie/Stuckey/etc. 2) They didn't address the fact the Browns FO didn't pick up more defensive FA to bolster the roster--the Bullocks and the Lofa Tatapus of this world--not necessarily the Ray Edwards and the Nmandi As. superstuds. the media sucks for not holding the browns fo accountable.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2011 3:47 PM
RE: Ten on ?
K2S - serious question.
did any of the cleveland media press shurmur/heckert/holmgren about the lack of FA? We could use depth and it seems nobody talks about the issue anymore--it's a dead issue--the media seems scared to bring it up. Haven't seen it in the papers much.
the new regime SHOULD be more open than Mangini--right?
- Come on man, just how many times do they need to say the same thing before you understand that they aren't going to sign any big name FA's? They have a plan and they're working it, and they don't care what you or I think about it. They want to see the young guys play and build through the draft.
TH said he'll be watching other team cuts to see if there's anyone who can help us. I think we'll see a couple of LBers, a interior OLman and possibly a vet WR signed IF there's someone he likes. Otherwise, what you see is what we're going to get.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 8/29/2011 5:36 PM
RE: Ten on ?
Nasdaq wrote: Gameface64 wrote: However, in the context of the 2011 Cleveland Browns, we don't have a lot of time to f;;:k around with 4th rounders who can't fill one of the many, many soft spots on the roster. Same with Cameron.
Right. Because we're bona fide playoff centenders this year.
Are you high already in the day?
This season is tantamount to 16 X games. It's straight up developmental. We gots nothing BUTT time to F around with 4th rounder project types. That was clear when Heckgren sat on his hands in FA after the labor stoppage an dthe 1st year HC installing new stsyens and re-boot number 5 in BTNG.
Tom rathman. Tom Rathman? Rathman was a F'n one dimentional battering ram leading Osbourns' I backs and didn't routinely start until year three. He was given 2 years to develop before being the full time starter and one of those was a flat out ST red shirt season. . And if Maricic isn't that in 2 X saeson games he lacks that versitility.
F me.
Just F me.
"Tom Rathman". I remember posters--not you--saying the 2009 season was like Mangini's exhibition season, and they were right. That being said, the team did improve down the stretch, even when it lost to SD and Det--the O came alive and we ran on Pittsburgh. Finally. I hope we have a season that's not "developmental" and one that's about taking that next step. :) :)
Last edited 8/29/2011 5:37 PM by kosartoslaughter
|
|
Reply |
Quote |