Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)

Re: Another Trey reset

Avatar

Posted: 2/7/2013 11:00 AM

Re: Another Trey reset 



hamster wrote:
Nasdaq wrote: http://www.ohio.com/blogs/clev...tition-1.369744

Skip over the bright shiney media ready QB controversy and pay attention:

“They’re studying,” Haslam said. “I think we have a pretty good feel for what our needs are. They’re going to look at free agency, and they’re going to look at the draft. I think we’ll be selective in what we do in free agency, but if there’s some talent out there that matches our needs and it’s at the right dollar level, then I think we’ll probably make some moves. I don’t think you’ll see us make any big, splashy, high-priced moves because I think we’ve said all along we’re going to build through the draft.”

"Greet the new boss. same as the old Boss."

My god Naz, what did you want him to say? 

 

If Trey were all maximum-leader-movey-shakey and bold as when he cam ein on the white tanker trruck, he'd bust out somethin that goes a little something like this (hit it)

"The days of 5 year plans are over in Cleveland. Winning is what matters most, and winning this coming year is included in that statement. I don't know how many more games we can win next season or the seasons after that exactly. I make no grand promises of outcomes. What I do promise is an intense focus, extraordinary effort, and a sense of urgency that we will do everything possible to start winning now. Not after 3 drafts. Not after offensive and defensive systems are installed and coaches are comfortable. Now.  I have instructed Joe and his team to be as aggressive as possible in any and all phases available to them to build this team. I have dircted them to bring every avialable resource to bear to win now; and I have A LOT of resources to offer them. I expect them to follow my directives and I will hold them accountable based on wins and losses.  I look forward to seeing the outcomes and being as supportive as I possbly can in the way they determine is best to help them acomplish the one and only objective that matters in the NFL: winning football games.  

We are not the "same old" Cleveland Browns. I didn't pay one-billion dolllars for that and you shouldn't pay for tickets for that, either." 

Something like that, followed by action and accountability to lend credibility that statement would be a dandy start with me Hamm.

More I think on it, more I say after all this time and the need they felt to capriciously  re-boot F U < K "building through the draft" and "prudent in free agency". May as well just build in the damn excuses now. Why wait?

Last edited 2/7/2013 5:14 PM by Nasdaq

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/7/2013 9:24 PM

Re: Another Trey reset 



Nasdaq wrote:

 

If Trey were all maximum-leader-movey-shakey and bold as when he cam ein on the white tanker trruck, he'd bust out somethin that goes a little something like this (hit it)

"The days of 5 year plans are over in Cleveland. Winning is what matters most, and winning this coming year is included in that statement. I don't know how many more games we can win next season or the seasons after that exactly. I make no grand promises of outcomes. What I do promise is an intense focus, extraordinary effort, and a sense of urgency that we will do everything possible to start winning now. Not after 3 drafts. Not after offensive and defensive systems are installed and coaches are comfortable. Now.  I have instructed Joe and his team to be as aggressive as possible in any and all phases available to them to build this team. I have dircted them to bring every avialable resource to bear to win now; and I have A LOT of resources to offer them. I expect them to follow my directives and I will hold them accountable based on wins and losses.  I look forward to seeing the outcomes and being as supportive as I possbly can in the way they determine is best to help them acomplish the one and only objective that matters in the NFL: winning football games.  

We are not the "same old" Cleveland Browns. I didn't pay one-billion dolllars for that and you shouldn't pay for tickets for that, either." 

Something like that, followed by action and accountability to lend credibility that statement would be a dandy start with me Hamm.

More I think on it, more I say after all this time and the need they felt to capriciously  re-boot F U < K "building through the draft" and "prudent in free agency". May as well just build in the damn excuses now. Why wait?

Oh F"""k yeah Nas. I been saying this since day 1 of Holmgren. I'm so on board that I'm actually off board and pushing the wagon from behind. Patience is now officially a dirty word.
>>> Decleater <<<
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/8/2013 7:18 AM

Cold Water splash......................... 



Gameface64 wrote:
Nasdaq wrote:

 

If Trey were all maximum-leader-movey-shakey and bold as when he cam ein on the white tanker trruck, he'd bust out somethin that goes a little something like this (hit it)

"The days of 5 year plans are over in Cleveland. Winning is what matters most, and winning this coming year is included in that statement. I don't know how many more games we can win next season or the seasons after that exactly. I make no grand promises of outcomes. What I do promise is an intense focus, extraordinary effort, and a sense of urgency that we will do everything possible to start winning now. Not after 3 drafts. Not after offensive and defensive systems are installed and coaches are comfortable. Now.  I have instructed Joe and his team to be as aggressive as possible in any and all phases available to them to build this team. I have dircted them to bring every avialable resource to bear to win now; and I have A LOT of resources to offer them. I expect them to follow my directives and I will hold them accountable based on wins and losses.  I look forward to seeing the outcomes and being as supportive as I possbly can in the way they determine is best to help them acomplish the one and only objective that matters in the NFL: winning football games.  

We are not the "same old" Cleveland Browns. I didn't pay one-billion dolllars for that and you shouldn't pay for tickets for that, either." 

Something like that, followed by action and accountability to lend credibility that statement would be a dandy start with me Hamm.

More I think on it, more I say after all this time and the need they felt to capriciously  re-boot F U < K "building through the draft" and "prudent in free agency". May as well just build in the damn excuses now. Why wait?

Oh F"""k yeah Nas. I been saying this since day 1 of Holmgren. I'm so on board that I'm actually off board and pushing the wagon from behind. Patience is now officially a dirty word.
SD:

Not that , I'm above lighting a torch or tossing gas on a flame gents , butt lets make sure we got the right house , before we turn it into embers.

I would think that the last thing you would want to do if your smart and savvy is to fan the flames of expectations of a rabid fan base with unreasonable expectations , nor sound the hunting horns and scare off all the game before you go tromping thru the woods to add meat on the table .

Our coffers are loaded , we can poach both the Zona pigeons and the flying rats for defensive players which fit our scheme , and we can fill known holes on offense prior to the draft , while still being in position to augment even modest free agent pickups with high round draft picks to a returning class of expereinced youth tested in the NFL fare.

Now is the time to point the invasion toward the Pot of Calais , while hiding that Normandy is our landing
spot .

Anybody who reveals their real intent this time of year should be slapped ,likewise anybody going shopping in a buyers market advertising they'll pay sticker price is a damn fool .

Haslem didn't become a billionaire paying Rodeo Drive prices for landfill realestate and doubt he's gonna start now.

The Bear Bryant poor mouthing masks their intent , lessons expectations and creates reality in the negotiating room .

It ain't sexy but it is fiscally judicious policy you can sustain grow and develop and build on because your base is solid .


SoulDawg
WAR : OUR TIME HAS COME
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/8/2013 8:23 AM

Re: Another Trey reset 



Nasdaq wrote: 

 

If Trey were all maximum-leader-movey-shakey and bold as when he cam ein on the white tanker trruck, he'd bust out somethin that goes a little something like this (hit it)

"The days of 5 year plans are over in Cleveland. Winning is what matters most, and winning this coming year is included in that statement. I don't know how many more games we can win next season or the seasons after that exactly. I make no grand promises of outcomes. What I do promise is an intense focus, extraordinary effort, and a sense of urgency that we will do everything possible to start winning now. Not after 3 drafts. Not after offensive and defensive systems are installed and coaches are comfortable. Now.  I have instructed Joe and his team to be as aggressive as possible in any and all phases available to them to build this team. I have dircted them to bring every avialable resource to bear to win now; and I have A LOT of resources to offer them. I expect them to follow my directives and I will hold them accountable based on wins and losses.  I look forward to seeing the outcomes and being as supportive as I possbly can in the way they determine is best to help them acomplish the one and only objective that matters in the NFL: winning football games.  

We are not the "same old" Cleveland Browns. I didn't pay one-billion dolllars for that and you shouldn't pay for tickets for that, either." 



That ^^^^^^^....ten thousand freaking times that ^^^^^^^

"Patience my ass. I'm going out to kill something"

Sincerely,

The Vulture

Do you even Ebola?

Last edited 2/8/2013 8:23 AM by AudieTheGreat

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/8/2013 11:03 AM

Re: Another Trey reset 



Nasdaq wrote:

 

If Trey were all maximum-leader-movey-shakey and bold as when he cam ein on the white tanker trruck, he'd bust out somethin that goes a little something like this (hit it)

"The days of 5 year plans are over in Cleveland. Winning is what matters most, and winning this coming year is included in that statement. I don't know how many more games we can win next season or the seasons after that exactly. I make no grand promises of outcomes. What I do promise is an intense focus, extraordinary effort, and a sense of urgency that we will do everything possible to start winning now. Not after 3 drafts. Not after offensive and defensive systems are installed and coaches are comfortable. Now.  I have instructed Joe and his team to be as aggressive as possible in any and all phases available to them to build this team. I have dircted them to bring every avialable resource to bear to win now; and I have A LOT of resources to offer them. I expect them to follow my directives and I will hold them accountable based on wins and losses.  I look forward to seeing the outcomes and being as supportive as I possbly can in the way they determine is best to help them acomplish the one and only objective that matters in the NFL: winning football games.  

We are not the "same old" Cleveland Browns. I didn't pay one-billion dolllars for that and you shouldn't pay for tickets for that, either." 

Something like that, followed by action and accountability to lend credibility that statement would be a dandy start with me Hamm.

More I think on it, more I say after all this time and the need they felt to capriciously  re-boot F U < K "building through the draft" and "prudent in free agency". May as well just build in the damn excuses now. Why wait?


Well that's what it would be like if another Jim was running the Browns.  But in the real world you can't be in an ultra-regulated, ultra-competitive market of 32 companies and just pull a magic trigger and 'win'. 

You are not patient and unfortunately for all of the whining and gnashing of teeth about 5 year plans the reality is that neither are most Browns fans.  How many 5 year plans have actually been given 5 years?  Instead they've become 2 or 3 year plans.

Haslem, when he first began talking as our team's owner, said that he understands that the most important thing is not the players or the coaching staff or even the GM.  It's the philosophy of the system as a whole that is important.  That's what he learned in his time as a part-owner in Shitsburgh.  Turnover is expected but turning the system inside out every 3 years is not. 

He's committing to the system.  That's what he has to do as an owner.  And while you may disagree with it the teams in the NFL Superbowl this past year didn't get there by making big FA splashes.  They got their by committing to a system and adding pieces and parts, one by one, where they could help.  They've changed their defense on occasion over the last few years moving from a 43 to a 34 and back to a 43.  They changed their head coach.  They changed their OC in the middle of the season.  But they never stopped building a team with a single 'Ravens' phiosophy.  That is a tribute to Ozzie, who's the architect of that system, more than anything.  

Anquin (sic) Boldin wasn't the biggest signing over the last few years for Baltimore but I'd argue he had the biggest impact of any FA on the field for the Ravens in the playoffs.  Meanwhile the Bills, who won the offseason last year, are rebuilding again with a new coach, a new system, and no real philosophy. 

So think about it a little bit Jim.  I'd like them to sign some guys that will help them get to where we all want them to go but they shouldn't be signing guys to win today.  They need guys who will be there to help them win in a couple years when they're ready.

Last edited 2/8/2013 11:04 AM by 0tter

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/8/2013 11:10 AM

Re: Another Trey reset 


Being an owner is a bit like being President. 

You can talk promises and agenda and applying your unique stamp, but then you enter office, move to the center, and realize the changes swagger has to be tempered. 

Pretty soon, you at least start sounding similar to your predecessor.  We'll see if the walk matches the talk.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/8/2013 12:14 PM

Re: Another Trey reset 



0tter wrote:
Nasdaq wrote:

 

If Trey were all maximum-leader-movey-shakey and bold as when he cam ein on the white tanker trruck, he'd bust out somethin that goes a little something like this (hit it)

"The days of 5 year plans are over in Cleveland. Winning is what matters most, and winning this coming year is included in that statement. I don't know how many more games we can win next season or the seasons after that exactly. I make no grand promises of outcomes. What I do promise is an intense focus, extraordinary effort, and a sense of urgency that we will do everything possible to start winning now. Not after 3 drafts. Not after offensive and defensive systems are installed and coaches are comfortable. Now.  I have instructed Joe and his team to be as aggressive as possible in any and all phases available to them to build this team. I have dircted them to bring every avialable resource to bear to win now; and I have A LOT of resources to offer them. I expect them to follow my directives and I will hold them accountable based on wins and losses.  I look forward to seeing the outcomes and being as supportive as I possbly can in the way they determine is best to help them acomplish the one and only objective that matters in the NFL: winning football games.  

We are not the "same old" Cleveland Browns. I didn't pay one-billion dolllars for that and you shouldn't pay for tickets for that, either." 

Something like that, followed by action and accountability to lend credibility that statement would be a dandy start with me Hamm.

More I think on it, more I say after all this time and the need they felt to capriciously  re-boot F U < K "building through the draft" and "prudent in free agency". May as well just build in the damn excuses now. Why wait?


Well that's what it would be like if another Jim was running the Browns.  But in the real world you can't be in an ultra-regulated, ultra-competitive market of 32 companies and just pull a magic trigger and 'win'. 

You are not patient and unfortunately for all of the whining and gnashing of teeth about 5 year plans the reality is that neither are most Browns fans.  How many 5 year plans have actually been given 5 years?  Instead they've become 2 or 3 year plans.

Haslem, when he first began talking as our team's owner, said that he understands that the most important thing is not the players or the coaching staff or even the GM.  It's the philosophy of the system as a whole that is important.  That's what he learned in his time as a part-owner in Shitsburgh.  Turnover is expected but turning the system inside out every 3 years is not. 

He's committing to the system.  That's what he has to do as an owner.  And while you may disagree with it the teams in the NFL Superbowl this past year didn't get there by making big FA splashes.  They got their by committing to a system and adding pieces and parts, one by one, where they could help.  They've changed their defense on occasion over the last few years moving from a 43 to a 34 and back to a 43.  They changed their head coach.  They changed their OC in the middle of the season.  But they never stopped building a team with a single 'Ravens' phiosophy.  That is a tribute to Ozzie, who's the architect of that system, more than anything.  

Anquin (sic) Boldin wasn't the biggest signing over the last few years for Baltimore but I'd argue he had the biggest impact of any FA on the field for the Ravens in the playoffs.  Meanwhile the Bills, who won the offseason last year, are rebuilding again with a new coach, a new system, and no real philosophy. 

So think about it a little bit Jim.  I'd like them to sign some guys that will help them get to where we all want them to go but they shouldn't be signing guys to win today.  They need guys who will be there to help them win in a couple years when they're ready.
No. He says he's committing to a set of systems. We don't know that he has the ability to actually do it. If the team has a disappointing season after some shaky personnel moves the fans will be...somewhat upset...if something like that develops, we'll see if truck stop boy has the stamina to take something he's never had to take before. An openly dismissive local and national press.
Reply | Quote
  • Lumpy
  • Cotton Dog
  • 9638 posts this site

Posted: 2/8/2013 12:16 PM

Re: Another Trey reset 


Good post Otter.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/8/2013 5:14 PM

Re: Another Trey reset 



0tter wrote:
Nasdaq wrote:

 

If Trey were all maximum-leader-movey-shakey and bold as when he cam ein on the white tanker trruck, he'd bust out somethin that goes a little something like this (hit it)

"The days of 5 year plans are over in Cleveland. Winning is what matters most, and winning this coming year is included in that statement. I don't know how many more games we can win next season or the seasons after that exactly. I make no grand promises of outcomes. What I do promise is an intense focus, extraordinary effort, and a sense of urgency that we will do everything possible to start winning now. Not after 3 drafts. Not after offensive and defensive systems are installed and coaches are comfortable. Now.  I have instructed Joe and his team to be as aggressive as possible in any and all phases available to them to build this team. I have dircted them to bring every avialable resource to bear to win now; and I have A LOT of resources to offer them. I expect them to follow my directives and I will hold them accountable based on wins and losses.  I look forward to seeing the outcomes and being as supportive as I possbly can in the way they determine is best to help them acomplish the one and only objective that matters in the NFL: winning football games.  

We are not the "same old" Cleveland Browns. I didn't pay one-billion dolllars for that and you shouldn't pay for tickets for that, either." 

Something like that, followed by action and accountability to lend credibility that statement would be a dandy start with me Hamm.

More I think on it, more I say after all this time and the need they felt to capriciously  re-boot F U < K "building through the draft" and "prudent in free agency". May as well just build in the damn excuses now. Why wait?


Well that's what it would be like if another Jim was running the Browns.  But in the real world you can't be in an ultra-regulated, ultra-competitive market of 32 companies and just pull a magic trigger and 'win'. 

You are not patient and unfortunately for all of the whining and gnashing of teeth about 5 year plans the reality is that neither are most Browns fans.  How many 5 year plans have actually been given 5 years?  Instead they've become 2 or 3 year plans.

Haslem, when he first began talking as our team's owner, said that he understands that the most important thing is not the players or the coaching staff or even the GM.  It's the philosophy of the system as a whole that is important.  That's what he learned in his time as a part-owner in Shitsburgh.  Turnover is expected but turning the system inside out every 3 years is not. 

He's committing to the system.  That's what he has to do as an owner.  And while you may disagree with it the teams in the NFL Superbowl this past year didn't get there by making big FA splashes.  They got their by committing to a system and adding pieces and parts, one by one, where they could help.  They've changed their defense on occasion over the last few years moving from a 43 to a 34 and back to a 43.  They changed their head coach.  They changed their OC in the middle of the season.  But they never stopped building a team with a single 'Ravens' phiosophy.  That is a tribute to Ozzie, who's the architect of that system, more than anything.  

Anquin (sic) Boldin wasn't the biggest signing over the last few years for Baltimore but I'd argue he had the biggest impact of any FA on the field for the Ravens in the playoffs.  Meanwhile the Bills, who won the offseason last year, are rebuilding again with a new coach, a new system, and no real philosophy. 

So think about it a little bit Jim.  I'd like them to sign some guys that will help them get to where we all want them to go but they shouldn't be signing guys to win today.  They need guys who will be there to help them win in a couple years when they're ready.

Not talking about what they do. That's not his job. His job is to hire the guys that do.

I'm talking about what he projects and how he articulates the franchise. That was the subject at hand.

He doesn't have to promise the next quan Bolden. That's not his job. But if you're gonna lead and you talk a big game when you close the deal, then lead. If not, be Randy.

Don't talk like Churchill and play like Chamberlain ( <- for SD) .

Right now, this whole line of script is more of the same.
Reply | Quote