Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)

Re: Weeden, QBs and the draft

  • redright
  • Faithful Best Friend
  • 12845 posts this site

Posted: 2/4/2013 6:03 PM

Re: Weeden, QBs and the draft 




---------------------------------------------
--- SoulDawg74 wrote:


Gameface64 wrote: So Haslam says Weeden will have competition next year. Thought this through and I think its a good idea. Maybe Weeden has it, and if he does, competition is not going to hurt him. Maybe he doesn't, in which case, the sooner we get someone else the better. It's not like Weeden lit up the league last year, he flashed, but lots of QBs flash. What he didn't do was play well consistently, or show a steady upward trend of reading defenses and exploiting weaknesses. It might be better coaching, but again, competition should not hurt. Exhibit 1A, Russell Wilson and Matt Flynn.

Speaking of, what are the options for bringing in some competition. Alex Smith or Matt Flynn would be alright with me, we've got the cap, might as well spend some of it if the guaranteed money isn't that big. And if the coaches believe those guys can fit and excel in Cleveland. Put 'em up against Weeden and see what happens.

If they don't want to go that route, I wouldn't blink twice in using our first pick on a QB. Matter of fact, if I were GM, I'd use my first or second pick in every draft on a QB until I found one. It's a roll of the dice, but until you Yahtzee a QB, you're going nowhere anyway. Fill in around that pick with whatever else you can get and free agents.
SD:

I wouldn't pull the trigger on a QB in this draft class before the third round .

Doesn't make sense with so much better defensive talent to reach for 2nd tier QB talent in the first round in panic , bad enough they'll be a frenzy of desperation for those picking high beret of even a Weed type talent who will try and justify such waste with such doomed moves and I pray its not us.

You can upgrade the competition at the spot thru free agency without wasting resources should Weeds pan out .

DA would push Weeden , same big arm and knows the offense ,and wouldn't cost draft picks , allows you to push Weeds  and develop him and leaves room for a third wheel to develop .

Nat Moore would cost less than Smith and also give you a push .

Flynn isn't a fit in this scheme , his arm is only slightly stronger than McCoys , and just had his clock cleaned by a rookie , so thats paise.

Smith has more experience than Weeds , but his arm isn't as good , although he could execute a ball control type scheme , I feel the big cash and essentially giving up on Weeden without leaving him an opening to be the man in his second year ,would be counterproductive .

Use these methods and leave your resources available to shop for QB talent via the draft in 2014 if Weeds doesn't respond.

Too soon to pitch him , and Marylynn Monroe ain't in this class, that you could draft her and kick him to the curb.

$.02


SoulDawg

---------------------------------------------

Like the concept. Line up a staff of big armed down field Q B s. If that's what Chud and Norv want in a Q B then they should all fit. Get Weeds, Anderson, Moore, and Mallic , or such as you may, and develop your offens. All on the same page . Get what you can for Colt and Lewis. No reason to have differing styles .
Reply | Quote