Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)

Re: No personal attacks on the forum.

Posted: 1/23/2013 11:56 AM

Re: No personal attacks on the forum. 


"no; you called me a baby for even asking about it...that is a personal attack."

-- Now I see where you are coming from! 

I wrote something like: I'll lay it on you. Baby.

As in: I'm going to lay it on you, baby.

As in: Now I'm going to reveal the truth.

In that context "baby" is merely a way to say "buddy" or to indicate sincerity. At least in my little mind. I see it as a 70's thing and did not mean it in a hurtful or bad way.  In fact, I was poking fun at myself for spending so much time on an irrelevant Harbaugh thing.

I wasn't calling you a baby in the negative way. Just in a "buddy" way. I actually mean this sincerely.

Again, some link requests indicate an honest desire for information and aren't an underhanded way to attack a person or a desperate attempt to confuse things in a debate-like manner. 

I believe yours was a "good" link request. 

Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/24/2013 10:25 AM

Re: No personal attacks on the forum. 



HeadHole wrote: "no; you called me a baby for even asking about it...that is a personal attack."

-- Now I see where you are coming from! 

I wrote something like: I'll lay it on you. Baby.

As in: I'm going to lay it on you, baby.

As in: Now I'm going to reveal the truth.

In that context "baby" is merely a way to say "buddy" or to indicate sincerity. At least in my little mind. I see it as a 70's thing and did not mean it in a hurtful or bad way.  In fact, I was poking fun at myself for spending so much time on an irrelevant Harbaugh thing.

I wasn't calling you a baby in the negative way. Just in a "buddy" way. I actually mean this sincerely.

Again, some link requests indicate an honest desire for information and aren't an underhanded way to attack a person or a desperate attempt to confuse things in a debate-like manner. 

I believe yours was a "good" link request. 

I'm stupid...honestly, thanks for clearing that up. You can't tell sometimes with the internet. I have liked your posts before, so thanks for clearing it up! :) You should post on PF more!
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/24/2013 11:07 AM

Re: No personal attacks on the forum. 


"I'm stupid...honestly, thanks for clearing that up"

-- I was stupid to write it in a way that could be misunderstood. That's what I get for channeling Telly Savalas. Anyway, I'm glad I could explain it. 

"You should post on PF more!"

-- This is a "be careful what you wish for" statement. But I can add this, since it has a bit of a Alex Smith/Colin Kapernick/San Francisco edge:

With Chud's non-committal comments about the starting QB position, does this show a sign that we may have a Jimmy Claussen kind of guy in Weeden? Will we possibly see a high draft pick spent on a QB as Weeden's "career" takes a down-turn? Did anyone in-house draft Weeden? Didn't the new owner and his minions lean towards a "new broom" approach? Haven't we had lots of turnover at QB? Didn't Chud come from Carolina, where Newton replaced Claussen? 

Am I being even more stupid to ask these questions?
Reply | Quote