Posted: 1/24/2013 9:01 PM
Gary Reents wrote: G:The NFL suggested Collins, Randy got Collins. The NFL suggested Banner, Haslam got Banner. Same.Randy and Collins hired Romeo then hired Phil. Haslam and Banner hired Chud, then officially hired Lombardi.The only real difference in method was Randy didn't lie about any of his hires for months.HCollins 'never' worked for any NFL team. He sold advertizing. No comparision. Phil never had the experience for what he was given, Crennel too. We also had a first time OC & DC. Haslam has beaten ole Jammies hands down in putting together his first FO period.G:The mancrush leads you to believe Haslam is ahead of Randy. You don't know until you see how they do. Step by step, the same process. Different people so there can always be a different result. Assuming a better one is just a product of the man crush.HNope, facts do. I explained above part but not all. Just because they all had teeth doesn't make them the same. Do one knows the outcome or is predicting it. All I'm saying is we know Randy failed and Haslam has put us in a better position to succeed. Facts are this FO is FAR better qualified and proven.G:No excuse at all. Randy decided to listen to the people he hired, the experts. His decision. And perhaps you'll be correct and if Banner decides to go slow, Haslam will goose him to spend, spend, spend. HNone of this helps yer cause. If he hired a ball boy for the GM should he have listened to him too? Randy did a horrible job giving to many people a job that they never had experience at and all at once. There was never a system of checks and balances with accoutablity and experience to help newbies grow into thier job titles. He gave to much power that was unwarrented and was gulible to what they said.GBut its the product of your man crush that you believe you know he's going to do that. You hope he will, but none of us know that he will. What Haslam SAID was that Banner was in charge of the football ops. And if Banner decides that he's just going to extend contracts, sign some his own players and dabble in B level free agents...who knows if he'll do as he says he will do or do what you say he'll do.HSo without knowing yerself you are making up stories of what might be? Its your man crush that led you to believe Randy was doing it the same and even better. Man crush, Man crush, Man crush, Nah nah nah nahhhhh G:Let's see what he does. That's the primary point. Lets see what he does instead of assuming what he'll do and the spout off as if he's already done it. If he spend on FA and spends big, not just a few journeymen signings, then he's done it. Until he does it, he doesn't get credit for doing it. Seems pretty reasonable. Not sure why that upsets you so.HNo one is spouting off and saying anything is a done deal. Upset? Please....I like what I've seen so far with Chud, Norv,Horton and special teams. I like he let Kelly walk for a number of reasons. I'm willing to give both Banner & your boogeyman Lombardi time to see if they are competent or not. No one said (and you really know it) that Haslam can't fail or make mistakes that will be called out later. You keep saying it as if it wll stick but its not. G:Al didn't. Jimmy Bob Haslam 3 would have to go a long way to be the businessman Al Lerner was. Al started from nada and built an financial empire. Jimmy Bob took his daddy's company and built it up to be the premier set of truck stops in the country.HAnd Randy took his daddys team down the toilet even more than daddy while doing nothing else anyone can point to. Haslam wins again..... GBut your man crush has you believing he's Thomas Crowne. HWhile your man crush has proven Randy to be Thomas Clown regardless of tap dancing around it.GWhile we have every indication that Jimmy is a smart man and knows truck drivers like the back of his hand, Al was a damn good businessman and he didn't rename the stadium for money.HYep got to love those credit card people right? They know hard work. To bad none of those smarts you are saying Al had, never helped Randy. Thought you said ole Al started the flush of our team? Guess he is the devil when you need to protect Randy but a Saint when needing to 'try' and bury Haslam.G:While admitting you have a problem is the first step to recovery, I don't think you've realized yet the extent of the man love you have for Jimmy.HPhysician heal thy self..... Are those Randy's jammies I see under your shirt?GHe's just a guy, Ham. Just a guy. He's a bright, rich guy in a league full of bright rich guys. He has about as much chance of succeeding as any other new owner.HYep and I hope he does. I've got a limited time on earth now and ole Randy who was the dumb and not so bright rich guy wasted 10+ years of my life. Rich people come in all sizes and smarts. GAll of them are serious about their franchise. All of them. They have way, way too much money tied up into the NFL to be otherwise. So the Browns got a bright southern gentleman that made billions in an unrelated industry and he paired himself up to a guy who always wanted to be in charge of the football operations of a football team. And together they lied to the fans and media for months and hired someone most fans and most local media despise and mistrust. HSince I don't know but you want to believe it, ok. I really don't care if he lied. I really don't care if he hired an unpopular person. I'm sure Randy spun things at times. Maybe not to the degree but he most like did. Most NFL types and owners do. Randy also showed what happens when you let fans make decsions. (See Phil Savage and other knee jerk reactions). All I care about is winning for once. Having a team thats fun to watch and respected rather than being the butt of all jokes. We have now succeeded to make the Bengals respectful due to Randy's watch. Pathetic. If Haslams moves backfires I'll have no problem pointing them out but not until something is seen.I pulled for Randy at first. I pulled for Savage at first. I pulled for Holmgren so givng a benifit of doubt at first isn't new or wrong. Time not your created boogeymen will tell the tale.GThey missed out on their hot targets. Seem to have hired a coordinator that has a reasonable chance of being a good headcoach. Everything else remains to be seen.HSorry, you can believe they missed. I say they let go after seeing he wasn't committed. You can't make a girl love ya sometimes no matter what you own or promise Eagles. Kelly got his team. G:Nah. I don't use cartoons. When I make what seems to be an extravagant statement about someone, I bring a rationale and evidence to back it up. Yours in this case is "He ain't Randy so he's gonna...."HNah back at ya. Yer human and wrong at times, you just haven't figured it out. GPitiful.HSad for you. Its one thing to think others are inferer but worse to think you are setting the bar others can't reach. Must be good to be you (unfortunately only in yer head)GMaybe Lombardi changed. Maybe Lombardi believes he's changed. Time will tell. But its just another risk that's added onto an inherently risky venture. Each additional risk increases the liklihood of failure.HDon't disagree. I only balance it out with the good in Chud, Norv, Horton and the other guyHaven't seen any bad moves yet when it comes to what will be seen on the field.GThe right way to develop a profile so you don't create a cartoon is watch how people act. And my point in all these threads is Haslam and Banner are building a collection of moves here that are...suspect on several levels.HNope. its seen in action and results. I like the 'actions' of what I seen in the areas mentioned so far. All the other stuff is silly noise until the draft, pre-season and games start. Then it all comes to the front. I fine until it does. Love to keep it going but got to go for now
My mother never breast-fed me. She told me she liked me as a friend - Rodney Dangerfield
Copyright © 2013
and Scout.com. All rights reserved. This website is an unofficial independent source of news and information, and is not affiliated with any school, team, or league.
MSN PrivacyLegalAdvertise on MSNAbout our adsRSS
© 2012 Microsoft|