Posted: 1/21/2013 9:50 PM
hamster wrote: When lane reports on something that has happened he is very accurate. When you have to quote 'sources' or hear second hand information from others (even those you trust) its not always 'as' accurate. Things said and thing done can be entirely different. Add to it when thing are negative and passed from one person to another they grow in proportion. Also, regardless of who is the source that doesn't mean is was jaded, exaggerated or one-sided. This has nothing to do with Lane bottom line. There is plenty of information from all over.I also said Banner & Lombardi could be pricks and arrogant. Still doesn't mean they can't make it work or haven't learned from their past. Most people who take charge do have egos and rub people the wrong way from time to time. Ask Mangini.....errr should I say Mumbles?I'm not for Banner or Lombardi. I'm saying regardless of who they really are we may be better off now that anytime under little ole Randy's rule. Its not woe for me or the sky is falling until some real evidence presents itself. What have you seen to think different?
MSN PrivacyLegalAdvertise on MSNAbout our adsRSS
© 2014 Microsoft|