Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)

RE: If A is true, then B must be true. And if B is true, then...

Posted: 1/21/2013 3:11 PM

RE: If A is true, then B must be true. And if B is true, then... 


Lane is pretty well connected though Ham.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 1/21/2013 3:19 PM

RE: If A is true, then B must be true. And if B is true, then... 


When lane reports on something that has happened he is very accurate.  When you have to quote 'sources' or hear second hand information from others (even those you trust) its not always 'as' accurate.  Things said and thing done can be entirely different.  Add to it when thing are negative and passed from one person to another they grow in proportion.  Also, regardless of who is the source that doesn't mean is was jaded, exaggerated or one-sided.  This has nothing to do with Lane bottom line.  There is plenty of information from all over.

I also said Banner & Lombardi could be pricks and arrogant. Still doesn't mean they can't make it work or haven't learned from their past.  Most people who take charge do have egos and rub people the wrong way from time to time.  Ask Mangini.....errr should I say Mumbles?

I'm not for Banner or Lombardi.  I'm saying regardless of who they really are we may be better off now that anytime under little ole Randy's rule.  Its not woe for me or the sky is falling until some real evidence presents itself.  What have you seen to think different?

My mother never breast-fed me. She told me she liked me as a friend - Rodney Dangerfield
 

Last edited 1/21/2013 4:27 PM by hamster

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 1/21/2013 9:50 PM

RE: If A is true, then B must be true. And if B is true, then... 



hamster wrote: When lane reports on something that has happened he is very accurate.  When you have to quote 'sources' or hear second hand information from others (even those you trust) its not always 'as' accurate.  Things said and thing done can be entirely different.  Add to it when thing are negative and passed from one person to another they grow in proportion.  Also, regardless of who is the source that doesn't mean is was jaded, exaggerated or one-sided.  This has nothing to do with Lane bottom line.  There is plenty of information from all over.

I also said Banner & Lombardi could be pricks and arrogant. Still doesn't mean they can't make it work or haven't learned from their past.  Most people who take charge do have egos and rub people the wrong way from time to time.  Ask Mangini.....errr should I say Mumbles?

I'm not for Banner or Lombardi.  I'm saying regardless of who they really are we may be better off now that anytime under little ole Randy's rule.  Its not woe for me or the sky is falling until some real evidence presents itself.  What have you seen to think different?
SD:

We don't know that , and we certainly can't assume that based on both their past reps .

Both left scorched Earth and ruin in their wakes .

You can however hope that the marriage of a Cobra and a Rattler can morph into a snake you can pet without getting bit , butt I wouldn't stick my hand in that cage , however your more than welcome.

SoulDawg
WAR : OUR TIME HAS COME
Reply | Quote