Posted: 1/17/2013 6:25 AM
Nasdaq wrote: What we know :Ken Wisenhunt was a finalist for HC. He was interviewed twice. He didn't get the job.The Rumors:Banner wanted say over his staff hires. Banner says not true. Whizz thru rumors says its so. I ask myself who has motivation to lie here? Would Whizz really care enough to lie bring jilted by.... The Browns? Or would a man trying to hire a GM with a reputation for infighting & micro managing and little mans non- football ego?Speculation is the Browns didnt want more transition. Given they uprooted a successful respected GM & first time HC who felt with a lockout & no camps in transition year & playing 22 rooks or 2 year starters does that make sense?The only unit that HAD vet talent & underperformed had the coach retained.Cost has been also speculated. Is that true? If so, what does that mean about Haslam?What does any of this say about Banner & Trey if Whizz is truthful ?I fully expect The Defenders of the Faith to knee jerk & bleet and bahhh, so if you have to pollute PF with Big Board thought fascism maybe put an asterisk in your subject line so I & others who like to mull over the potential schenarios as data point without final conclusion but try to have them at the ready for future pattern understanding can skip them and talk as men while you fight over the Happy Meal toys.
Last edited 1/17/2013 6:54 AM by Gary Reents
MSN PrivacyLegalAdvertise on MSNAbout our adsRSS
© 2014 Microsoft|