Scout.com: 4-3 or 3-4 vs the read option

Why Subscribe?

Player/Prospect News
Exclusive Insider Info
Members-Only Forums
Exclusive Videos
Subscribe Now!

Inbox

Chat Room (0 fans in chatroom)

Page 1

< Prev. Topic | Next Topic >

+ View Thread
4-3 or 3-4 vs the read option by Gameface64 @ 1/13/13 1:53 PM
- Re: 4-3 or 3-4 vs the read option by SoulDawg74 @ 1/13/13 4:53 PM
  - Re: 4-3 or 3-4 vs the read option by poppa9601 @ 1/13/13 10:11 PM
    - Re: 4-3 or 3-4 vs the read option by Nasdaq @ 1/13/13 10:35 PM
      
      Re: 4-3 or 3-4 vs the read option by daddywags @ 1/13/13 10:47 PM
      
      Re: 4-3 or 3-4 vs the read option by Gameface64 @ 1/14/13 9:13 AM

Re: 4-3 or 3-4 vs the read option

Gameface64
All takes bona fide
8576 posts this site
Send Private Message

Posted: 1/14/2013 9:13 AM

Re: 4-3 or 3-4 vs the read option

DW,

I doubt Kaepernick will be running for almost 200 yards per game 5 years from now either. But I would bet that he'll still be a very good NFL QB who's a threat to run, and I bet there will still be versions of plays where young QBs have an option to throw, run or pass.

There's nothing new in the game, but the game always evolves.

>>> Decleater <<<

Reply | Quote

Page 1

< Prev. Topic | Next Topic >

Cleveland > Forums > Pure Football > 4-3 or 3-4 vs the read optionBack to Top