Posted: 1/13/2013 4:30 PM
Nasdaq wrote: I was thinking...If we're going back to an Oedaphat Rex style "Hopey-change- attacky" D we're in a rebuild process.It's one thing to take the DL depth Heckert spent 3 years drafting & signing & project it to a 3-4. That's fine. Butt it ain't what feeds that. What makes an attacking D go is the back 7 you simpletons. You need DBs that can hold in press man on islands. We got 1. You need LBers that can get up field & up against traffic & make plays. We got none. We have a solid stay at home Mike & a bunch of kids who are smallish or not all that fast. You'd have to draft a Jone or Kivi Mingo number 1 to get a playmaker & that means waiting on DBs. Or go CB & you got JAGs out of place. There can be no worse KoolAId to stir in the off season than projecting Sheard as an elephant and expecting transformation via projection. Or one of the kids bulking up at WS OLB & expecting quality. Bad moon rising. Attacking & failing = blowouts.
Posted: 1/13/2013 4:42 PM
Posted: 1/13/2013 5:00 PM
Gameface64 wrote: SD,Don't blend Nas's take with mine.That's how bad Sci Fi movies get started. You're gonna end up with some sick mutation that must die or mankind will suffer.
Posted: 1/13/2013 6:47 PM
Posted: 1/14/2013 8:54 AM
Nasdaq wrote: Megacroc vs Super snake? Tiffany & Debbie Fibson?Leave Tokyo now.
MSN PrivacyLegalAdvertise on MSNAbout our adsRSS
© 2014 Microsoft|