Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)

Re: Attacking D = Reboot

Avatar

Posted: 1/13/2013 2:14 PM

Re: Attacking D = Reboot 



Nasdaq wrote: I was thinking...

If we're going back to an Oedaphat Rex style "Hopey-change- attacky" D we're in a rebuild process.

It's one thing to take the DL depth Heckert spent 3 years drafting & signing & project it to a 3-4. That's fine. Butt it ain't what feeds that. What makes an attacking D go is the back 7 you simpletons. You need DBs that can hold in press man on islands. We got 1. You need LBers that can get up field & up against traffic & make plays. We got none. We have a solid stay at home Mike & a bunch of kids who are smallish or not all that fast.

You'd have to draft a Jone or Kivi Mingo number 1 to get a playmaker & that means waiting on DBs. Or go CB & you got JAGs out of place. There can be no worse KoolAId to stir in the off season than projecting Sheard as an elephant and expecting transformation via projection. Or one of the kids bulking up at WS OLB & expecting quality.

Bad moon rising. Attacking & failing = blowouts.
I don't know that's all true. I'll tell you the same thing I told the poster who thought it was just no problem to switch, it all depends on how the coaching staff sees it.

I wouldn't be surprised to see the first three picks go D, though.
Reply | Quote