Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
< Prev.  Page of 3  

Re: Lane Johnson Combine

Posted: 2/23/2013 2:26 PM

Re: Lane Johnson Combine 


Fisher also looks like he had good numbers.  Joeckel might not be as valued after the performances of other Tackles at the combine.  Noticed the top ranked gaurd - Womack is a little behind the others on the performance list.  
beauti wrote: Lane had a 9'10" standing broad jump and it looks like he beat all the other OL's. Three TEs beat him however, but they weighed a lot less. Armstead finished 14th in the broad jump but his vertical leap was 34 1/2 inches, (1/2 inch better than Lane). For the work out warrior award for OL's, Armstead beat Lane in 3 out of the 4 events big testing events.

Armstead 40 47.1
Lane 40 4.72

Armstead lifting 31 reps
Lane lifting 28 reps

Verticle leap Armstead 34 1/2 inches
Verticle leap Lane 34 inches

Broad jump Lane 9'10"
Broad jump Armstead 9'4"
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/23/2013 2:33 PM

Re: Lane Johnson Combine 



BigSkySooner wrote:  - Womack is a little behind the others on the performance list.  

Womack looked rough. Rumor of quad injury.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/23/2013 2:38 PM

Re: Lane Johnson Combine 


Joeckel has always been, and will likely continue to be a technician rather than a supreme athlete. Very good tackle.
BigSkySooner wrote: Fisher also looks like he had good numbers.  Joeckel might not be as valued after the performances of other Tackles at the combine.  Noticed the top ranked gaurd - Womack is a little behind the others on the performance list.  
beauti wrote: Lane had a 9'10" standing broad jump and it looks like he beat all the other OL's. Three TEs beat him however, but they weighed a lot less. Armstead finished 14th in the broad jump but his vertical leap was 34 1/2 inches, (1/2 inch better than Lane). For the work out warrior award for OL's, Armstead beat Lane in 3 out of the 4 events big testing events.

Armstead 40 47.1
Lane 40 4.72

Armstead lifting 31 reps
Lane lifting 28 reps

Verticle leap Armstead 34 1/2 inches
Verticle leap Lane 34 inches

Broad jump Lane 9'10"
Broad jump Armstead 9'4"
Current Medical Student.

NOTE TO ANYONE ON THIS BOARD:
Spaceman is an aggie fan that has gone so far as to pose as an OU fan. He bashes players, coaches, and the conference OU plays in. Please do not respond.
Soonerman2077 is another well known troll.


Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/23/2013 3:16 PM

Re: Lane Johnson Combine 


I think that Joeckel's #'s may have cost him first overall.
ekalika wrote: Joeckel has always been, and will likely continue to be a technician rather than a supreme athlete. Very good tackle.
BigSkySooner wrote: Fisher also looks like he had good numbers.  Joeckel might not be as valued after the performances of other Tackles at the combine.  Noticed the top ranked gaurd - Womack is a little behind the others on the performance list.  
beauti wrote: Lane had a 9'10" standing broad jump and it looks like he beat all the other OL's. Three TEs beat him however, but they weighed a lot less. Armstead finished 14th in the broad jump but his vertical leap was 34 1/2 inches, (1/2 inch better than Lane). For the work out warrior award for OL's, Armstead beat Lane in 3 out of the 4 events big testing events.

Armstead 40 47.1
Lane 40 4.72

Armstead lifting 31 reps
Lane lifting 28 reps

Verticle leap Armstead 34 1/2 inches
Verticle leap Lane 34 inches

Broad jump Lane 9'10"
Broad jump Armstead 9'4"
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/23/2013 3:26 PM

RE: Lane Johnson Combine 


Too much fantastic tape on Joekel to let average, not terrible, combine numbers hurt him. His numbers aren't bad at all, he is simply in a draft class with a few freak athletes at the position that are nowhere near the player he is. If he had run a 5.5, put up less than 20 reps, jumped under 8', etc. then yeah I could see not taking him first. As it sits though, he is the best player in the draft at a premium position. Still have to see what happens with Albert, that is going to decide who gets drafted first more than anything.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/24/2013 2:05 PM

Re: Lane Johnson Combine 


http://www.nfl.com/combine/story/0ap1000000144392/ article/terron-armstead-lane-johnson-head-banner-d ay-for-olinemen

Luke Joeckel, OT, Texas A&M: Joeckel's never going to be considered an athletic freak, but he was solid in everything he did on Saturday. Overall, it was a B+ performance -- nothing truly stunning, but also nothing to be alarmed about. This is always how I've felt about Joeckel: What you see is what you get. There are no wow characteristics -- he's just a rock-solid player. Unlike some evaluators, I don't think it's a slam dunk that Joeckel will be the first tackle selected in April. This isn't anything against Joeckel; it's a testament to the immense talent of Fisher and Johnson. This is the time of year when those latter two players are going to jump out at you, given their stellar athleticism.

Lane Johnson, OT, Oklahoma: Johnson put up incredible workout numbers (4.72 in the 40, 34-inch vertical jump, 9-11 broad jump), but his positional work was even better. His ability to cut off the speed rusher in the kick-slide drill was superior to every other lineman in attendance. He created a tremendous amount of buzz among league evaluators with Saturday's showing.
Reply | Quote
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
< Prev.  Page of 3