|
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
|
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 11:48 AM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
4.72!
If he has decent hands would be a hell of a Tight End.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 11:50 AM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
soonerside wrote: 4.72!
If he has decent hands would be a hell of a Tight End. Weighing 303?
"Thousands have played this game but only a few can be Sooners." Barry Switzer
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 11:55 AM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
Lane would make a heck of an 'eligible tackle' in the red zone IMO, (for extra blocking as well as a pass receiver if he doesen't start in his rookie year).
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 11:57 AM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
"Vice President in charge of Media Statistics and Related Research." OU Garage Network |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 12:03 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
Lane had a 34" vertical according to the NFL site.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 12:13 PM
RE: Lane Johnson Combine
"Oklahoma offensive tackle Lane Johnson ran the second-fastest 40 for an offensive lineman, at 4.72 seconds, but he ran the fastest 10-yard split, at 1.61 seconds. So Johnson actually got from the starting line and to the 10-yard line three-hundredths of a second faster than Armstead."
1.61 is like Tommie Harris freakishness.
Last edited 2/23/2013 12:13 PM by EagleGrowl3
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 12:24 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
I know he will play OT, but he get his weight to 280 lbs he would have a sub 4.7 forty, right now his numbers are good enough to play TE.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 12:26 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
Sounds like another recruiting tool our coaches can use  |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 12:26 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
I know he will play OT, but he get his weight to 280 lbs he would have a sub 4.7 forty, right now his numbers are good enough to play TE.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 12:41 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
Just reported scrolled across on NFL Network as 4.79 Offical LOL Sooner fan fail EagleGrowl3 wrote:
BrutusBuck11 wrote:
ZachGivens wrote:
BrutusBuck11 wrote:
OUinSC wrote:
ZachGivens wrote: Would have been a combine record had it not been for OL Terron Armstead running a ridiculous 4.65 on his first attempt at 305 pounds.
Offical: Armstead: 4.71
Lane Johnson: 4.72
Doubtful, Johnsons unoffical was 4.75 and its very rare and i cant remember it ever happening that the offical is faster then the unoffical so it had to have been a typo
https://twitter.com/Gil_Brandt/status/305368742131 544064
Cool story bro, i dont buy it. it was a typo http://www.nfl.com/combine/top...L-LB-CB-OL-SPEC
More typos! lol |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 12:41 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
soonerside wrote: I know he will play OT, but he get his weight to 280 lbs he would have a sub 4.7 forty, right now his numbers are good enough to play TE. Be hard to take down, that's for sure.
"Thousands have played this game but only a few can be Sooners." Barry Switzer
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 12:42 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
BrutusBuck11 wrote: Just reported scrolled across on NFL Network as 4.79 Offical
LOL Sooner fan fail
EagleGrowl3 wrote:
BrutusBuck11 wrote:
ZachGivens wrote:
BrutusBuck11 wrote:
OUinSC wrote:
ZachGivens wrote: Would have been a combine record had it not been for OL Terron Armstead running a ridiculous 4.65 on his first attempt at 305 pounds.
Offical: Armstead: 4.71
Lane Johnson: 4.72
Doubtful, Johnsons unoffical was 4.75 and its very rare and i cant remember it ever happening that the offical is faster then the unoffical so it had to have been a typo
https://twitter.com/Gil_Brandt/status/305368742131 544064
Cool story bro, i dont buy it. it was a typo http://www.nfl.com/combine/top...L-LB-CB-OL-SPEC
More typos! lol Are you trolling right now? Because you're doing a bad job. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 12:47 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
BrutusBuck11 wrote: Just reported scrolled across on NFL Network as 4.79 Offical
LOL Sooner fan fail Only on your TV. Which isn't surprising. http://www.nfl.com/combine/top...amp;position=OL |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 1:24 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
Did Lane dominate last yr?
I just kept reading our OL needs to be more dominant.
How does Lane compare coming out of OU to Trent, Jamaal or Loadholt...
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 1:27 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
---------------------------------------------
--- JuicedPlayer wrote:
Did Lane dominate last yr?
I just kept reading our OL needs to be more dominant.
How does Lane compare coming out of OU to Trent, Jamaal or Loadholt...
---------------------------------------------
Athletically he compares to Williams, which is elite. Production wise he is not even in the same ballpark as any of them, especially in terms of run blocking.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 1:43 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
^^this. He is athletically gifted, but this is the area where i think his lack of experience showed. Not great tech at run blocking, had trouble shifting a dl's momentum when not shooting back off the line. I suspect he will do well at the next level, and he was a great sooner, but not a great run blocker in college. eddyjizza wrote:
---------------------------------------------
--- JuicedPlayer wrote:
Did Lane dominate last yr?
I just kept reading our OL needs to be more dominant.
How does Lane compare coming out of OU to Trent, Jamaal or Loadholt...
---------------------------------------------
Athletically he compares to Williams, which is elite. Production wise he is not even in the same ballpark as any of them, especially in terms of run blocking. Current Medical Student.
NOTE TO ANYONE ON THIS BOARD:
Spaceman is an aggie fan that has gone so far as to pose as an OU fan. He bashes players, coaches, and the conference OU plays in. Please do not respond.
Soonerman2077 is another well known troll.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 1:51 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
--------------------------------------------- --- EagleGrowl3 wrote: BrutusBuck11 wrote: Just reported scrolled across on NFL Network as 4.79 Offical
LOL Sooner fan fail Only on your TV. Which isn't surprising. www.nfl.com/combine/top...amp;position=OL--------------------------------------------- Just reminded me why I like Michigan You might be bigger, faster and stronger - but you will not out work me - ZRA
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 2:00 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
JuicedPlayer wrote: Did Lane dominate last yr?
I just kept reading our OL needs to be more dominant.
How does Lane compare coming out of OU to Trent, Jamaal or Loadholt... He wasn't as good as any of those guys. But he kept improving. Maybe if he had another year he could have been the best. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 2:05 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
Lane had a 9'10" standing broad jump and it looks like he beat all the other OL's. Three TEs beat him however, but they weighed a lot less. Armstead finished 14th in the broad jump but his vertical leap was 34 1/2 inches, (1/2 inch better than Lane). For the work out warrior award for OL's, Armstead beat Lane in 3 out of the 4 events big testing events.
Armstead 40 47.1
Lane 40 4.72
Armstead lifting 31 reps
Lane lifting 28 reps
Verticle leap Armstead 34 1/2 inches
Verticle leap Lane 34 inches
Broad jump Lane 9'10"
Broad jump Armstead 9'4"
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2013 2:21 PM
Re: Lane Johnson Combine
Chargers had to like Lane Johnson effort By Bill Williamson | Feb 23, 2013 2  PMINDIANAPOLIS -- Lane Johnson did nothing Saturday to keep his name out of the mix to be the San Diego Chargers’ selection with the No. 11 overall draft pick. As expected, the Oklahoma left tackle was blazing fast in the 40-yard dash at the NFL scouting combine. Johnson, a 6-foot-6, 303-pound former quarterback, ran a 4.72 40-yard dash. It was the second-fastest time for an offensive lineman Saturday behind a 4.71 posting by Terron Armstead of Arkansas-Pine Bluff. The previous combine record by an offensive lineman was 4.84. Let me ask you a question. Does being that stupid give you head aches? --------------------------------------------- --- BrutusBuck11 wrote: Just reported scrolled across on NFL Network as 4.79 Offical LOL Sooner fan fail EagleGrowl3 wrote:
BrutusBuck11 wrote:
ZachGivens wrote:
BrutusBuck11 wrote:
OUinSC wrote:
ZachGivens wrote: Would have been a combine record had it not been for OL Terron Armstead running a ridiculous 4.65 on his first attempt at 305 pounds.
Offical: Armstead: 4.71
Lane Johnson: 4.72
Doubtful, Johnsons unoffical was 4.75 and its very rare and i cant remember it ever happening that the offical is faster then the unoffical so it had to have been a typo
twitter.com/Gil_Brandt/status/305368742131 544064
Cool story bro, i dont buy it. it was a typo www.nfl.com/combine/top...L-LB-CB-OL-SPEC
More typos! lol --------------------------------------------- You might be bigger, faster and stronger - but you will not out work me - ZRA
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
SI Members Board