Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 3  Next >

Good article about DeLost Dodds

Avatar

Posted: 2/14/2013 5:59 AM

Good article about DeLost Dodds 




http://outkickthecoverage.com/texass-deloss-dodds- grapples-with-losing-legacy.php

Texas's Deloss Dodds Grapples With Losing Legacy

Published on: February 13, 2013 | Written by: Clay Travis

Poor DeLoss Dodds, he's starting to realize what Outkick the Coverage has been telling y'all for a couple of years now -- that his most lasting legacy is going to be as the athletic director who lifted Texas A&M athletics past the University of Texas. Dodds reached for the nation with the Longhorn Network and in the process he lost his state to the Aggies. Remember when Dodds said before the 2012 football season that the Aggies and the SEC were no threat to Texas and that they had a small sliver of the east side of Texas? Yeah, then the Aggies went 11-2, posted massive television ratings in Austin, had a redshirt freshman win the Heisman trophy, crushed Texas in 2013 recruiting, and are a consensus top five team in the 2013 preseason.


When Alabama comes to College Station on September 14, that contest will be bigger than any football game the Longhorns have hosted on campus in a decade.  

It's gotten so bad for Dodds that he's now tilting at other ex-Big 12 windmills. Yesterday he told the Austin-American Statesman, “We’re going to have good years again. Our bad years are not that bad. Take a school like Missouri. Our bad years are better than their good years."

Presumably Dodds forgot that Missouri beat Texas in 2011 in football and basketball three times. That was before Mizzou departed for the SEC and left Dodds squinting into the sunlight, an old Texas rancher who suddenly realized his land is in the midst of a perpetual drought. The rain ain't coming Deloss, the river doesn't flow the same direction it used to because the SEC earthquake changed things forever.    

The Missouri quote is most interesting because Dodds can't even pick on Texas A&M anymore, he's moving further down the former Big 12 food chain. Pretty soon Dodds will be pointing to Iowa State and saying, "Sure, Iowa State beat us this year, but look at history, the Cyclones are no match for the Longhorns over the past twenty years."

When Kansas State beats Texas again, Dodds will say, "Hell, we beat Kansas though. A .500 batting average would make you the best baseball player ever! Lord a mercy, let's get some perspective here, we still split with the state of Kansas in football."

It has to be incredibly painful for Deloss Dodds to have gotten so much right over his thirty-one years as Texas athletic director yet missed on the biggest issue, the one that will define his legacy at Texas. Dodds has been at Texas since 1981 and during that time he's made it rain on the Longhorn athletic department. But in the last few years all of the battles he's won have led to a lost war. He sacked the Alamo, but then Texas A&M went San Jacinto on his ***. Yep, Dodds is a modern day Santa Ana, a would be Texas dictator who thought he'd already won the war and then got whipped while he was in the middle of a siesta. 

See, the Longhorn Network was supposed to be Dodds's moon landing, the event that would garland his name with praise for the next several generations of Longhorn athletics. The Longhorn Network was going to be Dodds' walk-off shot, his Michael Jordan jumper over Bryon Russell, the moment that everyone would talk about as a seismic event in college athletics, the individual school network that would be heard 'round the nation. Everything really would be bigger in Texas. "Y'all look at Dodds," Texas fans would say, "he took the Longhorn brand to the nation and secured the future!"

Only it hasn't quite worked out like that.

Dodds lost the state of Texas to Texas A&M and the future of college athletics to the SEC, a conference he was scared to join back in 1992.  

The Longhorn Network is an abject failure that led to the collapse of the Big 12. Russia used to send its most hated prisoners to Siberia, never to be heard from again. Now ESPN sends its most hated talent to the Longhorn Network, the Sibera of sports television. How lost on the television dial is the Longhorn Network? More people watch the Jim Rome Show on the CBS Sports Network. The Longhorn Network was supposed to be the final coup of an illustrious career, instead it was goodbye Nebraska, Colorado, Texas A&M and Missouri. Hello TCU and West Virginia.

Deloss Dodds didn't just kill the Longhorn's future, he sabotaged the entire Big 12, devaluing a once proud brand for a few million extra dollars. No one watches the Longhorn Network and his own coaches are complaining about it giving competitive advantage to opponents. Worst of all, instead of perpetuating Texas Longhorn dominance for the next generation, it led to Texas's implosion. The Aggies galloped past the Longhorns and now poor Deloss is picking fights with Missouri. 

Oh, Dodds has got money, but money without football games that people care about is what dry humping is to sex, it defeats the entire purpose.

Deloss thought Texas's brand was so strong it didn't matter who they played. 

He was wrong about the biggest decision of his tenure. 

Totally and completely wrong.   

Recruits don't come to Texas because the athletic department has great facilities or because their games are on a special network, they come because they want to play in games that matter, in front of large national television audiences. Other than the Oklahoma game Dodds might as well be pitching horseshoes in an empty stadium. Dodds forgot the cardinal lesson of athletics, you're only as strong as your weakest link. And the Big 12 is mostly made up of weak links right now. That failure is all the more amazing because all he had to do was look to the NFL. The NFL brand is so valuable because all 32 teams have strength, each game has value, any team can win. 

Texas A&M saw that the SEC was recreating the NFL and jumped on board, Dodds was so arrogant he tried to build his own football network and went it alone. 

But one-way football dominance doesn't work, you have to have rivals, games that people care about watching.  

Look at Texas's 2013 football schedule.  

Holy hell, that's a lot of bad football games.

Ole Miss might be the second best game on Texas's schedule in 2013. Out of six home football games, Texas fans get to watch two teams from Kansas and have road trips to Iowa and West Virginia.

Ouch.

Pity poor Deloss, he's left picking on Missouri because he's just now realizing his decision-making failure. 

The real irony of Dodds picking on Mizzou? Missouri's future is brighter than Texas's. When the SEC Network is officially announced the Tigers will be making more television money than Texas does and they'll be playing in more games that matter. As a result, every year Deloss Dodds is going to be feuding further down the college football food chain.

Look out Sam Houston State, pretty soon Deloss Dodds, the Santa Ana of college athletics, is going to be ripping y'all too.  

Given the historical record, I'm taking Sam Houston State in the upset.

My goal in life is to be half as good a person as my dog already thinks I am.

 

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/14/2013 6:10 AM

RE: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


"his most lasting legacy is going to be as the athletic director who lifted Texas A&M athletics past the University of Texas."

"Deloss Dodds didn't just kill the Longhorn's future, he sabotaged the entire Big 12, devaluing a once proud brand for a few million extra dollars."

"Oh, Dodds has got money, but money without football games that people care about is what dry humping is to sex, it defeats the entire purpose."
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/14/2013 6:10 AM

Re: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


I think this article gives A&M way too much credit.  I think they were trying to spite Texas and go for a short term money grab. They had no idea what windfall this move would turn out to be for them.

Also, there is no guarantee that they will be able to sustain this.  Texas is too big of a fish and makes too much money to be thought of as lost the war for the state of Texas after just one season.

The program I worry about it is OU, a traditional giant that has lost a lot of their leverage by not jumping to the SEC with A&M when they had the chance.

If UT really, truly wanted to screw OU, all they would have to do is agree to go to the B1G, and then OU would be left holding the bag with Iowa State, K ST, OSU, etc.  We already know the PAC12 doesn't want OU without UT, that would leave Boren begging the SEC to take them.

One of the reasons why I don't hate UT anymore is because I honestly feel they wouldn't leave OU in the dark like that.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/14/2013 6:16 AM

RE: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


Agree Whisky.

OU is in a vulnerable postion. OU needs to make a move while they have leverage.

Texas is certainly gonna make a move if A&M continues with its success which IM sure it will.  A&M already has 7 commits

Last edited 2/14/2013 6:17 AM by MichaelCrichton

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/14/2013 6:18 AM

RE: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


Texas has sucked since Bama beat em and they can't go anywhere without giving up their tv rights to the conference. They ain't leaving. Pretty good read about how everybody except Texas feels about Dodds
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/14/2013 6:23 AM

RE: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


Dodds is hated by Texans for his commitment to Mack Brown and what he did to the Big12. He is done. A new AD will come in and Texas will make a move to another conference.

OU better move before.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/14/2013 8:18 AM

Re: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


I agree with the article,    his ego has hurt the big 12 more than texas.    they will find a spot to land but the rest of the big 12 may be holding the bag,    OU included.     the time may come when the big 12 is begging rice and tulsa to join.    that schedule is a typical texas schedule nothing new there

Last edited 2/14/2013 8:19 AM by drmouse

Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/14/2013 8:30 AM

RE: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


Deloss Dodds & David Boren have aborted the Big12. The conference is in the trash can waiting for the sanitation service.


Colorado was better for the conference than TCU and WVU combined.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/14/2013 9:05 AM

Re: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


what do you reckon Boren is thinking right now;

boy I look silly for being afraid of this chump Dodds

or

we have to keep trusting Deloss, he'll figure a way to get us out of this mess.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/14/2013 9:17 AM

RE: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


Boren and OU are "wall flowers"

Boren is going to look so stupid when Texas bolts for another conference.

Boren will be left babysitting the worst of the old SWC and the worst of the old BIG8
Reply | Quote
  • MEZCAL
  • All Big XII
  • 3303 posts this site

Posted: 2/14/2013 9:19 AM

Re: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


"Colorado was better for the conference than TCU and WVU combined"
 
That's a rediculous statement, Colorado is nothing in anything. They belong in the WAC, which is the only place they could be competitive in anything.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/14/2013 9:29 AM

RE: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


Lets suppose johnny football had a season ending injury in week 2, would this article exist??

No hiesman, no espn love fest, no big bama win, no cotton bowl display of humiliating OU and probably additional losses to La tech, ole miss total of 5 losses
image
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/14/2013 10:58 AM

Re: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


Actually A&M knew what it was getting into. The SEC has set the standard for college athletics. The B1G and Pac followed in their model. Ive said it hear for a long time. Its about what you bring to the conference. A&M bought its way into the SEC. Academics, solid athletic programs (admittedly not football lately), and fan support. A&M brings the entire state of Texas into the SEC footprint, which increased the current viewership by 60%. This wasnt a shot in the dark by Loftin, Slive, and Machen. They knew what they were doing. Stay tuned for SEC network. It will outdo the B1G in revenue by a longshot and continue to grow year after year. To this day we havent seen a penny from the SEC yet. Our first appropriation comes at the end of the athletic year this summer. A short term solution was adding tcu (not a full payed member for 3 years) and wvu. Those two teams have the smallest athletic budgets in the Big 12. It just stopped the bleeding. 

And the horns havent been losing the state over one season. Mack couldnt keep it hard after losing the MNC game vs Bama. With all that raked in talent they have, what have they done since? The Big 12 is a weaker conference and everybody knows it.  

So...why didn't OU jump to the SEC when the chance was there? What was so valuable to stay behind? If you dont think the Horns will ALWAYS look out for themselves and their power control, then you don't know Dodds. Hard to go to the Pac with the LHN. It will have to be dissolved to make any move other than go indie. Traditional matchups proved not to be an important factor to them. A&M has offered, they declined siting "scheduling issues." 

WhiskyKilo wrote: I think this article gives A&M way too much credit.  I think they were trying to spite Texas and go for a short term money grab. They had no idea what windfall this move would turn out to be for them.

Also, there is no guarantee that they will be able to sustain this.  Texas is too big of a fish and makes too much money to be thought of as lost the war for the state of Texas after just one season.

The program I worry about it is OU, a traditional giant that has lost a lot of their leverage by not jumping to the SEC with A&M when they had the chance.

If UT really, truly wanted to screw OU, all they would have to do is agree to go to the B1G, and then OU would be left holding the bag with Iowa State, K ST, OSU, etc.  We already know the PAC12 doesn't want OU without UT, that would leave Boren begging the SEC to take them.

One of the reasons why I don't hate UT anymore is because I honestly feel they wouldn't leave OU in the dark like that.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/14/2013 11:01 AM

RE: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


What options are available now that everyone agreed to the GOR?
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/14/2013 11:06 AM

RE: Good article about DeLost Dodds 


David Boren obviously has a man crush on DeLoss Dodds. He also hangs on every word that comes out of Barry Switzer's mouth. Barry told him to hire John Blake..He did. Barry told him to hitch the OU wagon to Texas..He did

David Boren is an incompetent. He has no business IQ..He is nothing more than a politician with a lot of contacts/
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/14/2013 9:29 PM

RE: Good article about DeLost Dodds 



MichaelCrichton wrote: Agree Whisky.

OU is in a vulnerable postion. OU needs to make a move while they have leverage.

Texas is certainly gonna make a move if A&M continues with its success which IM sure it will.  A&M already has 7 commits
What is it about Grant of Rights you don't understand? If UT leaves the Big 12 anytime in the next 12 years, the TV rights to all of their home football and BB games will belong to the Big 12 Conference until 2025.

So, let's say UT moves to the B1G. Any TV money derived from UT's home football and BB games will go straight into the Big 12 coffers and will be divided among the remaining Big 12 schools for the next 12 years.

Not only will UT get none of the TV money, but the B1G will get nothing either. So, when the B1G teams go to Austin to play the Horns, the B1G won't get a penny from the broadcast of those games. That's the real killer, because the rest of the B1G schools aren't going to want to give Texas a share of their TV proceeds when they get nothing in return.

It's this simple: no conference is going to accept Texas without the broadcast rights to the Horns' football and BB games. And no conference is going to accept Texas with LHN. If UT goes independent, their broadcast rights still go to the Big 12 by default. The value of those rights, based on the current TV contracts with ABC, ESPN and Fox, is roughly $250 million.  Texas ain't goin' nowhere, no place, no time.
Senior Historian. OU GARAGE NETWORK
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/14/2013 9:39 PM

RE: Good article about DeLost Dodds 



12233 wrote:
MichaelCrichton wrote: Agree Whisky.

OU is in a vulnerable postion. OU needs to make a move while they have leverage.

Texas is certainly gonna make a move if A&M continues with its success which IM sure it will.  A&M already has 7 commits
What is it about Grant of Rights you don't understand? If UT leaves the Big 12 anytime in the next 12 years, the TV rights to all of their home football and BB games will belong to the Big 12 Conference until 2025.

So, let's say UT moves to the B1G. Any TV money derived from UT's home football and BB games will go straight into the Big 12 coffers and will be divided among the remaining Big 12 schools for the next 12 years.

Not only will UT get none of the TV money, but the B1G will get nothing either. So, when the B1G teams go to Austin to play the Horns, the B1G won't get a penny from the broadcast of those games. That's the real killer, because the rest of the B1G schools aren't going to want to give Texas a share of their TV proceeds when they get nothing in return.

It's this simple: no conference is going to accept Texas without the broadcast rights to the Horns' football and BB games. And no conference is going to accept Texas with LHN. If UT goes independent, their broadcast rights still go to the Big 12 by default. The value of those rights, based on the current TV contracts with ABC, ESPN and Fox, is roughly $250 million.  Texas ain't goin' nowhere, no place, no time.
I am not a lawyer so I don't really understand how ironclad the Big 12 GOR's really are or aren't.

But I'll say this:  There are quite a few articles out there that present the argument that if a Big 12 school really wants out, they can attempt to get out and there is a reasonable chance that they will take their rights with them.

Again, I'm not saying I agree or disagree, just that those opinions are out there. 

Here is one example:

Title/Date: Myth of the Big 12's Grant of rights/ 3 Jan 2013

http://outkickthecoverage.com/myth-of-the-big-12s- grant-of-rights.php

Last edited 2/14/2013 9:40 PM by WhiskyKilo

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/15/2013 1:30 AM

Re: Good article about DeLost Dodds 



WhiskyKilo wrote: I think this article gives A&M way too much credit.  I think they were trying to spite Texas and go for a short term money grab. They had no idea what windfall this move would turn out to be for them.

Also, there is no guarantee that they will be able to sustain this.  Texas is too big of a fish and makes too much money to be thought of as lost the war for the state of Texas after just one season.

The program I worry about it is OU, a traditional giant that has lost a lot of their leverage by not jumping to the SEC with A&M when they had the chance.

If UT really, truly wanted to screw OU, all they would have to do is agree to go to the B1G, and then OU would be left holding the bag with Iowa State, K ST, OSU, etc.  We already know the PAC12 doesn't want OU without UT, that would leave Boren begging the SEC to take them.

One of the reasons why I don't hate UT anymore is because I honestly feel they wouldn't leave OU in the dark like that.
Actually, that is incorrect. The Pac-12 nixed the deal because of OU's insistence on intertwining its own destiny with oSu. We also later learned on our local news that the SEC wanted OU, but would not accept oSu. OU can write its own ticket just about anywhere, as soon as it will sever the umbilical cord with oSu. 

A&M expected it would make more money in the SEC over the long term, but even they are surprised that they had such a good season this year. Don't expect it to last very long, however. Bama, Florida and LSU are still the big boys on the block over there.

My goal in life is to be half as good a person as my dog already thinks I am.

 

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/15/2013 7:06 AM

RE: Good article about DeLost Dodds 



12233 wrote:
MichaelCrichton wrote: Agree Whisky.

OU is in a vulnerable postion. OU needs to make a move while they have leverage.

Texas is certainly gonna make a move if A&M continues with its success which IM sure it will.  A&M already has 7 commits
What is it about Grant of Rights you don't understand? If UT leaves the Big 12 anytime in the next 12 years, the TV rights to all of their home football and BB games will belong to the Big 12 Conference until 2025.

So, let's say UT moves to the B1G. Any TV money derived from UT's home football and BB games will go straight into the Big 12 coffers and will be divided among the remaining Big 12 schools for the next 12 years.

Not only will UT get none of the TV money, but the B1G will get nothing either. So, when the B1G teams go to Austin to play the Horns, the B1G won't get a penny from the broadcast of those games. That's the real killer, because the rest of the B1G schools aren't going to want to give Texas a share of their TV proceeds when they get nothing in return.

It's this simple: no conference is going to accept Texas without the broadcast rights to the Horns' football and BB games. And no conference is going to accept Texas with LHN. If UT goes independent, their broadcast rights still go to the Big 12 by default. The value of those rights, based on the current TV contracts with ABC, ESPN and Fox, is roughly $250 million.  Texas ain't goin' nowhere, no place, no time.
Numbers, you should be old enough to know that almost any contract can be broken.  Take my word for it, there will be at least one team that leaves the Big 12 before the 12 year contract is up, and it may very well not be Texas.  There is power in negotiation.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/15/2013 8:02 AM

RE: Good article about DeLost Dodds 



MichaelCrichton wrote: Deloss Dodds & David Boren have aborted the Big12. The conference is in the trash can waiting for the sanitation service.


Colorado was better for the conference than TCU and WVU combined.

Well, there's no longer anyone boasting that the Big 12 is "...much better off...." with WV and TCU than with A&M, Nebraska, Colorado and Mizzou.

The destiny of the Big 12 and to a lesser extent, the Big Ten and the SEC, hinges upon what happens with the Maryland lawsuits concerning the ACC exit fee. If Maryland wins, and I think it will, those three conferences will have a feeding frenzy on the ACC. I believe all three will end up with 16 schools.

The SEC won't take a school in a state where they already have a member and the Big Ten will be limited by its academic snobbery. My hunch is VT and NC St to the SEC, UVA and UNC to the B1G and Miami/FSU/Clemson/GT/Pitt/Louisville to the Big 12. That would make the Big 12 a great conference again.
Reply | Quote
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 3  Next >