|
Munger
|
|
|
Posted: 12/7/2012 10:21 PM
Munger
Did not make the trip to OSU this weekend and says he doesn't plan to reschedule. He's UCLA bound.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/7/2012 10:34 PM
Re: Munger
Donovan Munger's official visit to # OhioState doesn't start until tomorrow per his head coach. Everyone can relax. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/7/2012 10:36 PM
Re: Munger
Damn... I'm disappointed... I felt he would be a Buckeye at the end... I was really intrigued by Munger's size... simply put, he presents something different from what we already have... our dts are smaller and quicker, but Munger's girth reminds me of Hankins and Shariff Floyd... you don't find many 320 pound 18/19 year old kids w quick feet
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/7/2012 11:47 PM
Re: Munger
THESPORTSKING wrote: Damn... I'm disappointed... I felt he would be a Buckeye at the end... I was really intrigued by Munger's size... simply put, he presents something different from what we already have... our dts are smaller and quicker, but Munger's girth reminds me of Hankins and Shariff Floyd... you don't find many 320 pound 18/19 year old kids w quick feet Hill, around 310,to 315. Hale a current Buckeye also 310, to 315. Schutt isn't a small guy either, about 295. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/8/2012 6:19 AM
Re: Munger
Our DL will be awesome with or without Munger. If he picks Osu,Great. If he wants to go west, then I wish him well. No worries.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/8/2012 9:10 AM
Re: Munger
UCLA is recruiting Donavan to be an OL!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/8/2012 9:53 AM
Re: Munger
We need 2 wr, a lb, and a safety. That screams quick, gibson, mitchell, and bell. None of that screams munger. Do we take another interior OL or DT? That seems to be a log jam on our current team.
2014 recruiting wish list
1. Kyle Allen
2. Jamarco Jones
3. Raekwon McMillan
Ignore list:
Naplesbuckeye2002
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/8/2012 10:27 AM
Re: Munger
Forgot about Hill... good call
Why do we need another safety? We have 2 good ones in this class in Thompson and Lee, plus Tanner and possibly Worley... good thing about multiple safties is they can be demons on special teams and may grow into linebackers....
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/8/2012 10:39 AM
Re: Munger
THESPORTSKING wrote: Forgot about Hill... good call
Why do we need another safety? We have 2 good ones in this class in Thompson and Lee, plus Tanner and possibly Worley... good thing about multiple safties is they can be demons on special teams and may grow into linebackers.... Burrows will likely play safety as well. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/8/2012 11:17 AM
Re: Munger
I like Munger at guard. He's got the size/ agility to really lock up opposing DTs, and capable DTs are what's most likely to shut our style of offense down.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- ssbucks
- Legend
- 7950 posts this site
|
Posted: 12/8/2012 12:14 PM
Re: Munger
theFootballBeast wrote: We need 2 wr, a lb, and a safety. That screams quick, gibson, mitchell, and bell. None of that screams munger. Do we take another interior OL or DT? That seems to be a log jam on our current team. Never can have to many outstanding DL and OL. That is where Urban and staff are doing a great job. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/8/2012 2:43 PM
Re: Munger
Not a surprise, just not enough spots to go around. Munger is a good player. I wish him the best where ever he ends up. Lets face it, Conley took a spot that a few weeks ago was thought to be open to a few very interested recruits. Munger saw the door closing and is moving on.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2012 1:11 AM
Re: Munger
This information is incorrect and has been debunked by his HS coach.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2012 2:07 PM
Re: Munger
If he never visited this weekend, then that commitment thread on him is just garbage  |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2012 2:09 PM
Re: Munger
Another thread started by another wannabe recruiting expert........
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2012 2:12 PM
Re: Munger
Commitment is being reported by Bill Kurelic and the rest of the Twitterverse. Appears to be legit. Great news if true! |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2012 11:25 AM
Re: Munger
WeAreNuts wrote: Did not make the trip to OSU this weekend and says he doesn't plan to reschedule. He's UCLA bound. Don't know who your source is bro, but this is embarrassing. 
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2012 12:00 PM
Re: Munger
Next time just post: I am bored and needed to make a post. What is coming most likely makes zero sense so just ignore me. WeAreNuts wrote: Did not make the trip to OSU this weekend and says he doesn't plan to reschedule. He's UCLA bound. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2012 12:21 PM
Re: Munger
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2012 12:22 PM
Re: Munger
None of Hale, Bennett and Schutt is small. Hale and Schutt are both around 300-310lb. Bennett may be listed at 280lb. but looks much heavier. Incoming freshman Hill is above 300lb. as well. Try to make an informed post the next time. THESPORTSKING wrote: Damn... I'm disappointed... I felt he would be a Buckeye at the end... I was really intrigued by Munger's size... simply put, he presents something different from what we already have... our dts are smaller and quicker, but Munger's girth reminds me of Hankins and Shariff Floyd... you don't find many 320 pound 18/19 year old kids w quick feet |
|
Reply |
Quote |
